Why Arsenal should keep Fabregas for one more year

Why Arsenal should keep Fabregas for one more year


Today’s stories of ‘Arsenal likely to sell Fabregas to Barcelona’ are founded on this cute little exchange between Dan Roan (BBC) and his Arsenal source:

When asked about Barcelona’s transfer offer for Cesc Fabregas, the senior Arsenal official said:

“The offer was made formally in writing to our chief executive (Ivan Gazidis), and we said no straight away.”

Asked if the club expected another bid, the source said: “Possibly. If it’s enough I expect we’ll have to sell.”

On the surface that sounds like a no-brainer – if the fee is enough, i.e. if the transfer fee meets Arsenal’s valuation of the player, then they will consider the offer. You don’t put a price on something without considering that you would agree to sell it at that price, and Arsenal’s valuation of Fabregas would therefore be high enough to offset the loss of their captain (while keeping in mind that they would also save on wages and be able to bring in 2-4 quality players). It doesn’t matter if Fabregas wants to go, it only matters how high Arsenal value Fabregas, and whether it’s beneficial for them to sell him now or later (assuming they will one day sell him).

But the question isn’t whether Arsenal are ready to sell Fabregas but whether they have the kind of replacements lined up that would make this summer’s transfer business an upgrade on their current situation. The best thing that can happen for Arsenal is to have Fabregas well rested this summer, return to play a full season for them before going on to play in Euro 2012, and then transfer to Barcelona. Given that he is likely to be involved in international football for three consecutive summers (2012 – Euros, 2013 – Confederations Cup, 2014 – World Cup), this is the only season that he will have in the next four years that will be after a well-rested summer.

The value of Fabregas for Arsenal has not dropped. A well-rested, injury-free Fabregas surrounded by good and experienced players will make for a stronger Arsenal title challenge in 2011/2012 than a Fabregas-less Arsenal with no real leader on the pitch (unless you’re making Vermaelen or Nasri or RVP the captain, and in each case the burden is too great to bear for the player).

More than any other season, Arsenal need to keep Fabregas this summer – simply because it might be the best season he could deliver before he embarks on 3 more years of non-stop football.

It might even serve Arsenal to agree a straight-cash deal with Barcelona for 2012 in advance, similar to what United did with Madrid for Ronaldo.

In any case, Fabregas is likely to come back this season to Arsenal in better shape than he has been in for a few years. Might as well make the best use of him before cashing in.

Football on Mars
United spend 50m before July 1st, but who will they sign for central midfield?


  1. In spite of all your reasoning, I will say that it is more in our interest than not to let him go. However, we should only do so if the price is right.

    Whatever happens, we should have another captain for next season. Failure to do so will show a complete lack of understanding of why a team needs a captain. At every turn, he has given us reason why he should not lrad the team.

  2. I strongly feel that despite all the fuss, chatters, predictions and everything, this transfer period WILL again see only a couple of not-so-known players moving to Arsenal. Wenger can’t spend money. He just doesn’t have that switch in him.

    • i agree with that…unfortunately the genius behind most of the frees/cheap signings of the ninties were David Dein and others who are no longer at the club…in influx of players just isn’t good enough

      I had no idea about Cesc’s schedule over the next 4 seasons…that makes sense to keep him another and agree a transfer (in principle); gives Arsenal an opportunity to ease in the next potential captian and to gain some QUALITY players (all over the pitch) over the next two transfer windows…

  3. You make some very valid points but I think it’s a bad idea for clubs to hold onto players whose hearts are elsewhere. Considering how indifferent Cesc’s form was during the latter half of last season, I think it’s time to let him go and start rebuilding the way Liverpool did after letting Torres loose.

Comments are closed.