The BBC’s Football Coverage Is Appalling
News broke yesterday of Lee Dixon’s departure from the BBC football punditry team. Now Dixon is by no means a great pundit. He wasn’t enormously informative, didn’t have great vocal delivery. He wasn’t as good as Gary Neville or even Graeme Souness on Sky. Recently he was also becoming lax, whether it was saying Denmark were ‘well organised’ (all Scandinavian sides are ‘well organised’ in British football parlance) or that all Portugal had was Ronaldo (ignoring Nani, Moutinho and a good defence).
But was he the BBC’s best pundit? Absolutely. And his departure shows how abysmal the BBC’s football coverage has become.
The BBC, the UK’s public service broadcaster, is the biggest broadcaster in the world and has been for decades. The BBC has one of the most visited English language websites in the world. Every UK household pays a licence fee (about £145 and unless you have no television or way of receiving live broadcasts it’s a criminal offence to not pay up) and for that you get no adverts, no political bias and a healthy cluster of TV and radio channels.
The BBC used to be a giant when it came to pioneering sports coverage. Pretty much every major sport in the UK started off being broadcast by the BBC. This includes football, where BBC radio started broadcasting football in the days when commentators divided the pitch into thirds and would say ‘United in the middle third’ or ‘County in the attacking third’ (these phrases are still occasionally used today).
It would be wrong to sat BBC’s football coverage has always been fantastic. That would be false and overly nostalgic. Kenneth Wolstenholme, legendary for his commentary on the 1966 World Cup final, was a dreadful commentator. Watch YouTube highlights of games he commentated on and he’s constantly getting players mixed up, getting things wrongs with a strangely distant vocal delivery, like an aging father struggling to keep track of his grandchildren running around the garden. Jimmy Hill for all the good he did in football was a joke that went on too long. Trevor Brooking was grey in colour and deed.
But for all the faults those people had, the BBC’s football coverage has never been worse. It’s a disgrace.
Alan Hansen is the worst example of this. He says nothing interesting or original, offers no insight and at the last World Cup sneered at the prospect of doing any research on Algeria versus Slovenia. He also has a petty, ridiculous vendetta against Mario Balotelli (‘he’ll have to score ten hat-tricks in the Premier League before I’m convinced by him’) which combined with his remarks about ‘coloured’ players and refusal to condemn Kenny Dalglish for his ludicrous defence of Luis Suarez doesn’t do much for his racial equality credentials. He gives off the air of a bored middle aged timber merchant wishing he could play golf all day. And they don’t make for good football pundits.
Alan Shearer infamously said a while ago after a brilliant Hatem Ben Arfa goal ‘we don’t know much about him’. He’s saying this about a French international who has played in the Champions League and has been regarded as one of Europe’s brightest talents who plays for Newcastle, a club Shearer played for and managed (disastrously). It shows just how much he knows about football. Especially when he said about Balotelli ‘he hasn’t achieved anything yet’, apart from winning three league titles by the age of 21, more than Shearer won in an entire career. And for all Balotelli’s eccentricity, he’s never kicked a player in the head and then threatened to retire from international football if found guilty and suspended, like Shearer did before the 1998 World Cup.
Mark Lawrenson fancies himself not only as a pundit and co-commentator but as a comedian. A typical Lawrenson ‘joke’ was once when commentating on a Manchester United game, the camera panned to goalkeeping coach Eric Steele. ‘Oh Eric Steele. We used to call him stainless’ (stainless steel, geddit?). Humour that you’d expect from the old racist comedians who used to tour Britain’s clubs and arenas in the 1970’s.
Also with Lawrenson is the fact he’s so miserable. He’s commentating on big matches, watched by millions who’d sever various bodyparts if it meant being paid more in a month than a lot of people get paid in a decade, to watch football along with top quality hotels and first class airplane tickets. Yet he’s a gloomy, sarcastic presence, like a teenager pressganged into meeting a relative he doesn’t want to see.
The other pundits if anything are worse. Martin Keown commentates like a co-commentator on FIFA or Pro Evo, making obvious judgements at random periods. If you’re watching a match on the BBC and can’t recognise who’s commentating, it’s usually him.
When you do notice him, he criticised Germany for ‘arrogance’ and Italy for ‘celebrating’ in their Euro 2012 semi-final. Germany arrogant? They weren’t arrogant enough. Instead of playing like they could, they over-adapted to the Italians and got punished. Calling Germans arrogant, an English tradition loved by the tabloids was stupid. Having a pop at Italy for making a European Championship final? Bit rich coming from a man who greeted Ruud van Nistelrooy’s penalty miss like some wild ape.
Steve Claridge is plain odd. He mumbles on the Football League show about things like Notts County’s good home form or Doncaster’s change of manager, then on radio shouts and squeals about how rubbish everything is. Robbie Savage is just someone with absolutely no knowledge of football. Chris Waddle comes across as bitter and miserable on BBC radio.
Lee Dixon wasn’t a great pundit, but at least he usually did some research, had some reasonably interesting opinions and didn’t come across as an arrogant, smug, self-satisfied berk. The punditry is what’s wrong – Gary Lineker is a pretty good presenter who judging from his Twitter page has some insightful opinions.
But what does he have to work with? Buffoons who give the impression they wake up every morning and lick themselves with pleasure at what great people they are. BBC’s football coverage is appalling, getting worse and ITV, despite the efforts of Adrian Chiles, Andy Townsend and adverts to drag the quality down are becoming preferable to the BBC when it comes to football.
This is a very sorry state of affairs. Licence fee payers deserve better.



Email





Football News 24/7
18/07/2012 @ 17:02
I can’t see how Mark Lawrenson’s “Stainless Steele” joke had to be compared with racist comedians of the 1970s.
Also Gary Neville is a buffoon, an idiot and he takes pro English bias to an extreme.
Two minor disagreements in an otherwise great column.
18/07/2012 @ 17:25
Great read. Feel pretty much the same way. Though BBC’s F1 coverage was great. Since Sky took half the rights even that has come down to their football level. David Coulthard is an average commentator at best, much like his driving was. Their commentary team was mostly Martin Brundle and he went to Sky. Now it’s Eddie Jordan, who’s mostly a joker. Says the obvious things. You’d think since he was a team principal and owner of former F1 team Jordan, he would have few insights. Says a lot of what the rest of the paddock thinks of him.
The only good thing about their F1 coverage now is Jake Humphrey.
Since their football coverage is already so aweful, you’d think one of the geniuses there would have thought that they would get rid of these overpriced football ‘experts’ and try to save their F1 contract.
18/07/2012 @ 19:16
Great article overall – though I disagree with some of the points.
I think they urgently need to get someone in who has at least played football in the last 5 years at the highest level. Though ideally a recent ex-manager would be the man to get. They need tactical opinions and analysis that goes beyond the banal and obvious that we get at the moment.
For football league coverage, get a personality like Barry Fry or Gordon Strachan to brighten things up a bit
18/07/2012 @ 21:07
Part of the appeal of Sky was, and perhaps to some extent still is, comprehensive and enhanced football coverage. Pre-1992, the terrestrial channels used to show football in a piecemeal manner, with only about 15 games a season. BSkyB obviously show dozens of games per season. Even ESPN broadcasts a high quantity.
The central point is that BSkyB has a dedicated sports channel. ESPN IS a dedicated sports channel. they thus can expend resources as they deem fit on football coverage without much distraction. As the BBC is a national broadcaster, and essentially owned and funded by the state, it must accommodate all persons’ tastes/interests. I’m sure due to this reason, Sports has also been a secondary venture to it, especially when it has Eastenders, news channels, etc. engendering viewership/ratings.
18/07/2012 @ 23:00
Amen!
18/07/2012 @ 23:45
Great article. They need to keep Lineker, and ditch the rest. Concur that Dixon was the bright spark in an otherwise embarassing line up of Hansen (once great, now faded), Lawrensen (always useless) and Shearer (more useless even than Lawro). Clean sweep, all of them out now please.
19/07/2012 @ 01:24
Completely and totally spot on.
19/07/2012 @ 09:12
The only flaw with this is that Alan Hansen is actually a very good pundit. Yes he is rather unpleasant, yes he favours liverpool too openly, and perhaps he isn’t the best judge of character, but in terms of making comment on footballing tactics and gameplay, particularly with regard to defending, he is the best pundit on British TV.
19/07/2012 @ 09:22
What a great shout, make you right Hansen ,Lawro and Shearer just dont want to be there and they are really boring need to plugged into a 24v battery perhaps to liven them up, but how come the beeb have not noticed?ps my mate at work thinks your a gooner!
19/07/2012 @ 09:41
I’m so glad that there are other people out there that feel the same way about the BBCs football coverage.
Nobody mentioned Mark Bright, he’s certainly as rubbish as Lowro and Shearer.
19/07/2012 @ 09:53
Fantastic read. I agree with the majority of the things you’ve said. The BBC punditry can be shocking.
19/07/2012 @ 10:52
I think that this is your personal opinion being written as if it was fact. I personally agree that there a few useless individuals in the team, but I also like a lot of them. I dont think you really have the right to write this as if you are talking on behalf of the nation, when many people would totally diagree with you.
19/07/2012 @ 11:27
“And for all Balotelli’s eccentricity, he’s never kicked a player in the head”
Im sure scott Parker may not agree with that statement!!
19/07/2012 @ 13:29
Yes, but as I specifically said in the article he didn’t blackmail his country’s FA to avoid a suspension like Shearer when he kicked Neil Lennon in the head http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8fMbxLTpps
07/08/2012 @ 15:24
well it was a step on the leg…and he was backing up
19/07/2012 @ 16:21
Roberto Martinez was by some way the best pundit during the Euros, he actually had something to say. Hansen is “unbelievable” and “out of this world”.
19/07/2012 @ 18:51
Good article. Agree with most points made. Not quite sure why you connected the limp nickname “Stainless Steele” with racism though.
19/07/2012 @ 19:18
About Mark Lawrenson – I didn’t do a good job in making clear what I meant. I meant his ‘stainless steele’ quip was rubbish and the sort of tepid, unfunny humour you got from otherwise often racist comedians like Bernard Manning. Not that Lawro’s remark was at all racist or anything like that
Sorry about that.
19/07/2012 @ 19:52
The punditry should be on a term/season basis like elections for parliment/presidency. They get a season and if they’re rubbish they are off.
Instead of these dinosaurs filling the airtime and living of former glorys in a game that has evolved dramatically since their time playing.
20/07/2012 @ 03:26
No beef against the BBC, but it’s coverage of sporting events is no SuperBowl caliber. Seems like the network is giving pastimes the back seat and focusing on political rubbish. Maybe.
23/07/2012 @ 14:48
However bad the BBC is it is still 1000 times better than ITV.
24/07/2012 @ 14:24
Why do the BBC assume that ex-footballers are going to make great commentators or pundits. Have a listen to the Guardians Football weekly podcast or the Football Ramble podcast for some insightful and amusing views on the game. These people are not ex-professional footballers but instead show the enthusiasm and insight the license payer should be getting for their money. Bet their wage demands are a lot less also.
24/07/2012 @ 19:21
Really? I thought the two podcasts you mentioned spend their time being too critical of the game, of the people covering it, of footballers and generally bitching about life at all times. You don’t learn much.
Wage demands are based on exposure – they’ll be angling for more money if they were in front of a bigger audience, no one is in it for free.
28/07/2012 @ 01:52
Whoever is the commentator, they’re all way too biased to make a football match enjoyable. Thank God I understand Spanish and Italian as well.
05/08/2012 @ 01:08
how can you say that bbc is bad, itv is the worst by far everytime i hear andy townsend saying “you win football games by scorng goals.” REALY. atleast lowro is funny and abit edgy townsend is non of those things. also i think garth brooks is excellant and very entertaining. and how can you call lowro miserable when itv have roy kean. this artcle is awful.
05/08/2012 @ 11:29
Lawrenson funny and edgy? You’d get more humour from an orange.
06/08/2012 @ 00:42
Garath cooks is the only one who actually seems to know what he is talking about
07/08/2012 @ 15:28
i like townsend…