<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will removing Jol create instability at Tottenham?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/</link>
	<description>Football News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 13:33:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tottenham: Levy confesses to betraying Jol &#124; Soccerlens - Football News Blog</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/#comment-61274</link>
		<dc:creator>Tottenham: Levy confesses to betraying Jol &#124; Soccerlens - Football News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/#comment-61274</guid>
		<description>[...] an article I previously wrote, about whether the removal of Jol would cause instability at Tottenham, I am of the firm belief that it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an article I previously wrote, about whether the removal of Jol would cause instability at Tottenham, I am of the firm belief that it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/#comment-61167</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/#comment-61167</guid>
		<description>Paul Finn = correct.

Give him a new contract.

All managers make occasional errors - even at the height of his pomp Sir Alex had the occasional run of shocking games - usually prompting the move fickle of the united support to phone 6-0-6 and demand his immediate removal.

Compare their respective records, and remember the &#039;one game to save his job&#039; debacle with Sir Alex (I think he had been in the job five years, and won nothing at the time). At that time it could be argued that Sir Alex had inherited a better squad of players (most supportable), and been backed better in the transfer market (more debateable).

Hey, I could be wrong, but the ultimate proof will only be provided if BMJ is given another year or two in the job - the alternative, as has been pointed out is another couple of years of transition - with a new man coming in, taking time to evaluate the players he wants to keep, acquiring players he wants to acquire, and then, there is still no gaurantee that he will do better in three or four years time than BMJ may do in the next two.

It is a bad start - nort the end of the World! A decent lerague finsih and maybe a trophy are still possibilities. 5th again and a final/trophy would be definite progress - and the young team could carry that into the next year, and be, amazingly enough, a year older.

ger orf &#039;is back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Finn = correct.</p>
<p>Give him a new contract.</p>
<p>All managers make occasional errors &#8211; even at the height of his pomp Sir Alex had the occasional run of shocking games &#8211; usually prompting the move fickle of the united support to phone 6-0-6 and demand his immediate removal.</p>
<p>Compare their respective records, and remember the &#8216;one game to save his job&#8217; debacle with Sir Alex (I think he had been in the job five years, and won nothing at the time). At that time it could be argued that Sir Alex had inherited a better squad of players (most supportable), and been backed better in the transfer market (more debateable).</p>
<p>Hey, I could be wrong, but the ultimate proof will only be provided if BMJ is given another year or two in the job &#8211; the alternative, as has been pointed out is another couple of years of transition &#8211; with a new man coming in, taking time to evaluate the players he wants to keep, acquiring players he wants to acquire, and then, there is still no gaurantee that he will do better in three or four years time than BMJ may do in the next two.</p>
<p>It is a bad start &#8211; nort the end of the World! A decent lerague finsih and maybe a trophy are still possibilities. 5th again and a final/trophy would be definite progress &#8211; and the young team could carry that into the next year, and be, amazingly enough, a year older.</p>
<p>ger orf &#8216;is back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Finn</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/#comment-61091</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Finn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/#comment-61091</guid>
		<description>The best thing the board could do now is to give MJ a new contract, end all the speculation and sniping. MJ is still learning his trade, the EPL is a lot bigger than the Dutch league and he&#039;s had 2 1/2 seasons. Given his results you&#039;d think he would also be able to learn and improve, not unlike some of our young stars, no-one would suggest sacking them for off form games.

Dissecting his player selection is crazy, I think it unlikely that he moved for Bent knowing what a problem 4 starting strikers would give him and he did not get the left sided midfielder he wanted (probably Schjeider).

There are still things to fix at WHL but stability would be something this club has lacked for a long, long time and given our squad, its youth and its potential, it is the single best thing the Board could provide to allow the growth and development we need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best thing the board could do now is to give MJ a new contract, end all the speculation and sniping. MJ is still learning his trade, the EPL is a lot bigger than the Dutch league and he&#8217;s had 2 1/2 seasons. Given his results you&#8217;d think he would also be able to learn and improve, not unlike some of our young stars, no-one would suggest sacking them for off form games.</p>
<p>Dissecting his player selection is crazy, I think it unlikely that he moved for Bent knowing what a problem 4 starting strikers would give him and he did not get the left sided midfielder he wanted (probably Schjeider).</p>
<p>There are still things to fix at WHL but stability would be something this club has lacked for a long, long time and given our squad, its youth and its potential, it is the single best thing the Board could provide to allow the growth and development we need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bickley</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/#comment-61087</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Bickley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/#comment-61087</guid>
		<description>The problems the board(esp.Levy)have created cannot be blamed on Jol.Their behaviour,useing subterfuge and dishonesty, makes them totally culpable.Jol has his faults.
He can be pig-headed and at times seemingly vindictive,
but they have acted with about as much delicacy as a &#039;bull in a china shop&#039;.Why not meet Jol face to face?Tell him the problems and discuss the solutions.What you have stated about alternating stikers has worked in the past.Why was Defoe left out of the squad at Bolton.Was this a vindictive move to make Defoe sign a contract.Then again why won&#039;t he sign a contract.If this is a battle of wills everyone loses including Spurs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problems the board(esp.Levy)have created cannot be blamed on Jol.Their behaviour,useing subterfuge and dishonesty, makes them totally culpable.Jol has his faults.<br />
He can be pig-headed and at times seemingly vindictive,<br />
but they have acted with about as much delicacy as a &#8216;bull in a china shop&#8217;.Why not meet Jol face to face?Tell him the problems and discuss the solutions.What you have stated about alternating stikers has worked in the past.Why was Defoe left out of the squad at Bolton.Was this a vindictive move to make Defoe sign a contract.Then again why won&#8217;t he sign a contract.If this is a battle of wills everyone loses including Spurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vic</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/#comment-61065</link>
		<dc:creator>vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/#comment-61065</guid>
		<description>NO - Bye Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO &#8211; Bye Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hitler</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/#comment-61059</link>
		<dc:creator>hitler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/will-removing-jol-create-instability-at-tottenham/3296/#comment-61059</guid>
		<description>no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

