When is a dive not a dive?

Kevin Thomson is fit for Rangers’ UEFA Cup tie against Sporting Lisbon. I am so relieved because I thought he might be seriously injured. He took an awful clattering from Celtic’s Georgios Samaras when he deliberately moved his leg to the side so that he could make minimal contact with the Celtic player before throwing himself to the ground.
In my non-expert opinion that incident was as clear a dive as you will ever see. I feel that the injury and the carrying off were simply to divert attention away from what he did.
Thomson understandably reacts angrily to a suggestion such as this:
“To call me a cheat and a diver is outrageous because that kind of thing is just not in my nature,” Thomson told the Daily Record.
“I’ve had a look at the incident again on TV and I can see why people are saying I was trying to win a foul. But that’s not cheating. I had beaten Samaras with my first touch and I knew he was going to make contact with me. What was I supposed to do - jump out of his way?” he asked.
“If a striker is going through on a keeper and he knows he’s going to get hit does he try to jump out of it or does he wait for the contact? That’s not cheating or diving, that’s just part of football. So I’d be very disappointed if people levelled those kind of accusations at me. I play the game with my heart on my sleeve - I’m not a con artist.”
There is a whole debate to be had on whether you agree with Thomson’s definition of cheating or not. Maybe it would be nice if players who could avoid contact did avoid it and then try to score a goal. There is a strong argument against that and the argument was supported when referee Steve Bennett didn’t award a penalty to Manchester United when Rooney was clearly fouled by Carragher in the Liverpool game at Old Trafford, presumably because he stayed on his feet.
This is where my problem lies. The Scottish FA has said that they are going to eradicate simulation from the game. They are going to use video technology to retrospectively punish any player who is found to have ‘dived’. They are pushing UEFA to follow suit across Europe.
I have sympathy with this standpoint as I’m sure all football lovers would do, but in practice I simply don’t see how it will work.
Did Kevin Thomson dive on Saturday or not? I say he did but I’m sure that millions of football fans would disagree as well millions who would share my opinion. He went to ground because he was tripped, but he deliberately moved his leg in order that contact could be made. He did appear to be going down before he made that contact.
Dive or not?
Take the Wayne Rooney situation when he was tripped by Carragher. If he had gone to ground it would clearly have been a dive as he proved that he could avoid doing so. However, he was fouled. So if he had thrown himself to the ground would that have been simulation?
How would the authorities define ‘a dive’? In both of the cases I have mentioned it would appear that the player could have avoided going down, but contact, and therefore a foul, was committed. Simulation is defined as; ‘The act or process of simulating’. ‘An imitation; a sham’.’ Assumption of a false appearance.’ So falling over when you don’t have to seems to fit the bill.
I would still ask if Thomson did, or Rooney would have done, anything wrong by making the contact obvious to the referee.
Then we come onto everybody’s favourite subject of the moment. Cristiano Ronaldo. What a fantastic player this boy is. He is as good as anyone I have ever seen play the game but he is far from universally admired. Why is that? Because of his propensity to fall over fairly regularly in a game when he is breathed on by an opponent.
That is what most fans, other than Manchester United die hards, think. He certainly does seem to topple over fairly frequently I will admit. As a non-Manchester United supporter I have been occasionally heard to shout, “Get up you cheat,” at the television.
Again though, I would ask is Ronaldo actually diving or is he responding in a manner that simply makes the fact that he has been fouled obvious? Ronaldo arguably runs faster with the ball than any player in the world. Add to that the fact that his feet are as quick and tricky as any player in the world and you have a bit of a nightmare to defend against. If Ronaldo is running with the ball at full pace alongside a defender and he goes down I defy anybody to say categorically whether he was touched or not, and I don’t care how many camera angles there are.
If Ronaldo is even lightly touched it may well be enough to affect his balance and lead to him falling. I simply don’t know as even when at my peak in the Salisbury and District Sunday League I never quite had the pace of the Portuguese winger.
We all watch the incidents and some of them are very obvious. I remember Senderos taking a dive at Birmingham a few weeks ago. Not even the staunchest Gooner could have thought there was any contact. It was a good example as to why defenders should not attempt to join in this craze.
However, in a vast majority of cases it is not possible to be certain as to what actually definitively happened.
We must remember that by calling a dive we are calling the player a cheat. There is not much worse a player could be called. If we get it wrong that is a terrible slur on that player’s character. At the start of this article I declared that I think Kevin Thomson is a cheat. If he isn’t then what gives me the right to say it?
Graham Fisher writes at Views of a fan. Article originally written for Soccer News.
- Wayne Rooney - Diver?
- Arjen Robben dives for Chelsea’s cause
- Gerrard is a good diver
- Did Giggs “take a dive”?
- Robin van Persie’s “dive” raises more questions
Discussion - 10 Responses
Add Your Comment
Comments are moderated (our comments policy).











Kevin Thomson dived, no ifs, buts or maybes. He was already on the way over when he “bumped into” Samaras. The Celtic player didn’t actually move in any direction once the ball had been knocked past him so I don’t know how anyone can suggest Thomson was tripped. Why is there any dispute over this particular incident, it’s one of the clearest examples of cheating I’ve ever seen??!!
For him then to come out with the time honoured “it’s not in my nature” insults the intelligence of every football fan who saw the incident.
The only way to stop diving is to sanction any player found guilty of it. Two weeks wages and three games suspended would focus a lot of minds.
Execllent article.
It is an impossible situation for the ref, having to decide within a split second, whether it is a dive or a foul. Many times, even video replays prove inconclusive, as such, we really have to pity the ref. However, I believe video replays will help the ref. For this case of Thomson going down, it was clear from the replays that he has already started the motion of falling down before contact was made, as such, it shld be defined as a dive, and for the way he defended himself, I would call him a cheat as well
Good comments about Kevin Thompson’s dive. Compare that with Scott Brown of Celtic in the firsat half of the same match. He was going through on goal and Whittaker of Rangers got behind him and clipped his ankles. Brown didn’t go down at this juncture but tried to get a shot away. A less hoonest player would have went down but as the match was at ibrox it’s doubful a penalty would have been given anyway.
In Scotland we have the worst referees on the planet. Week in week out they make the most outrageous decisions ever, yet their boss, Don McVicar - himself being totally crap in his days - simply turns a blind eye, stating that they do a superb job.
At least in England the refs have the balls to admit making mistakes and the Football Association deal with persistent bad refereeing accordingly.
In Thomson’s case, it was quite honestly one of the worst attepmts to cheat I’ve ever seen, although his buddy Kirk Broadfoot was not far behind! What was the assistant referee doing - he had a clear view if the ref claims not to have had.
A Lithuanian player was slaughtered in the press in Scotland for diving whilst playing against Scotland, yet there has been no outcry against Thomson. Think it tells you who the press and media up here pander to eh?
Divers and cheats should be hammered. Too many peple blame diving as a ‘foreign’ disease. Sorry, but Thomson & Broadfoot are as Scottish as haggis!!
I find it amazing the outcry when there are suspicions of a Rangers player diving. Nobody reacted this way when Nakamura dived blatantly against St Mirren to earn a decisive free kick. This article also smacks of the blatant hypocrisy that surround these issues and how they are highlighted when certain teams are involved. Rangers, Arsenal, Man U and Chelsea. Maybe this is indicative of the inferiority complexes of others.
If it had been a Celtic player I would have written absolutely the same aticle.
Being a Watford fan I have an inferiority complex with most people
Id just like to see the outcome had this been commited by miko of hearts? or any other hearts player for that matter.he cheated blatantly imo altho it won`t be classed as that,… being an old firm player
Simple
i agree with big d that certain teams and players are highlighted more than others, last night eboue clearly dived against liverpool but i have not heard a word about it, yet any time ronaldo or drogba goes to ground it is a dive.
Here’s the thing - in many such incidents, there’s an element of doubt and if you can’t remove that doubt, you’ll have serious backlash if you sanction those players.
HOWEVER, there’s one situation each weekend (roughly speaking) where the dive is 100% clear. Banning those people (or sanctioning them as Oliver says) may be a deterrent - or like capital punishment, do fuck all except give us the satisfaction of punishing the offenders.