What are you talking about? Do you think I support Man Utd? I don’t support any of the top 4. I dislike Man Utd as much as I dislike Chelsea… well, almost.

In any case, if I support Man Utd, Bolton or Accrington Stanley it makes no difference about my opinion on Chelsea does it. If you are resorting to “We got results against two teams that you drew with” then you are just embaressing yourself, frankly.

Possession is meaningless, shots are meaningless if you do not make the keeper work. Carson had one save to make and that wasn’t very difficult.

Anyhow, I will leave you in your dreamworld where Chelsea were unlucky and anyone who disagrees with you must support Man Utd. Must mean every journalist in every paper who wrote an article covering the Villa Chelsea game supports Man Utd eh? Damn these conspiracies.

Fifth Column i appreciate your efforts in explaining to me your stupid theory again. The very fact that you could come up with 2 cooked up factors like(bad managament/lack of creativity) responsible for Chelea’s failure, leaves no room for discussion. Dig deeper and try and find responsible factors. If you want to sate your ego its OK but if you want an answer think. Think how did Martin O’Neill’s side come away with 3 points when they had gifted Chelsea (a side that perfromed badly) 60% possession in the game. We had some 20 odd shots on goal and 15 odd corners. Did we perform badly overall i surely dont think so.

I requested Ahmed to focus on the specifics of our loss and not make vague statements like “Chelsea are playing worse than the last season and discipline is enough to beat Chelsea”.
We got results against two teams that you drew with, so we are not playing worse, are we?
And when does ever any side play without discipline on the pitch in English game, you will be murdered, over again for it. That Discipline is enough to beat Chelsea in non-sense.
Those were vague comments to make.
And here you are again making even more foolish statements.

You ask me “Simple. Understand now?”.
I dont care to. Keep skimming the surface.

Try re-reading.

It says that Chelsea have indeed been playing the same system under Mourinho all the time which includes lack of creativity or excitement.

However, it also says that in the past the system was effective and now it is not.

This is not a contradiction in any way. Arsenal won the title that way under George Graham by dull 1v0 wins every week hence the moniker of “boring boring Arsenal” even now at many grounds even though they haven’t played that way for years and years.

Chelsea have been the same under Mourinho. Dull but consistent. This season they have remained dull but been less effective and this came to a head at Villa Park.

Simple. Understand now?

I have complete trust that he will win us the league again this season (Nevermind the Eufa CL). Those fans that think differently after 2draws and a loss, are idiots.

We started by playing ‘attacking footbal’, but with ‘bad luck’, we could not convert any of our kazillion chances. SAF then employed a strategy of ‘get onto winning ways’. He just need to build up the belief in the guys again. Once we start rolling again, the attacking play + results will come. To those who write ManU (and/or Chelsea) off, good on you. Enjoy it while it lasts.

As for commenting on him and that rogue Fifth Column i wont stoop as low as them. At least i still ahve faith in JM which they lost in SAF.

Fifth Column; You are contradicting yourslef. In one statement you say we have always lacked creativity and perform badly and later add we are not as effective as we used to be. “I dont understand how could we ever have been effective if never performed.”

What is your qualification Fifth Column. Man!! you summed up Jose in 3 lines!! Incredible. Please tell me was that your analysis or your esteemed opinion.

I can understand how you feel mate. But i’m sure you could have retaliated better with a jibe about Man Utd’s loss to City & how that was YOUR favourite result of the season. There will be many favourite results for all of us this year – Don’t get mad, get even!