<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Premier League To Play On Mars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soccerlens.com/week-in-review-4-11-feb-08/5792/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soccerlens.com/week-in-review-4-11-feb-08/5792/</link>
	<description>Football News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 13:33:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Bilal</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/week-in-review-4-11-feb-08/5792/#comment-79919</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/week-in-review-4-11-feb-08/5792/#comment-79919</guid>
		<description>Graham - the idea IS about money - but instead of discussing it without bias, it&#039;s being discussed with the presupposition that it&#039;s a really bad idea - which we don&#039;t know yet.

There are a couple of really good questions that the PL need to answer - how to ensure fairness in the draw and how to accomodate the local footballing authorities wherever they&#039;ll go to play. It&#039;s obvious that England-based fans will not travel to any of these games, and filling the stadiums will be another thing to look at although seeing the PLs track record and the shaping of this &#039;weekend&#039; as a &#039;football festival&#039; (another exercise in money-making, yes), I wouldn&#039;t bet against the stadiums being filled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham &#8211; the idea IS about money &#8211; but instead of discussing it without bias, it&#8217;s being discussed with the presupposition that it&#8217;s a really bad idea &#8211; which we don&#8217;t know yet.</p>
<p>There are a couple of really good questions that the PL need to answer &#8211; how to ensure fairness in the draw and how to accomodate the local footballing authorities wherever they&#8217;ll go to play. It&#8217;s obvious that England-based fans will not travel to any of these games, and filling the stadiums will be another thing to look at although seeing the PLs track record and the shaping of this &#8216;weekend&#8217; as a &#8216;football festival&#8217; (another exercise in money-making, yes), I wouldn&#8217;t bet against the stadiums being filled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Fisher</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/week-in-review-4-11-feb-08/5792/#comment-79912</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/week-in-review-4-11-feb-08/5792/#comment-79912</guid>
		<description>Ahmed,

What you say may be right, but another possibility is that this is an ill-thought out idea by a body of people only interested in making money.

It could just be that this is actually a very bad idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed,</p>
<p>What you say may be right, but another possibility is that this is an ill-thought out idea by a body of people only interested in making money.</p>
<p>It could just be that this is actually a very bad idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Bilal</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/week-in-review-4-11-feb-08/5792/#comment-79909</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/week-in-review-4-11-feb-08/5792/#comment-79909</guid>
		<description>The reaction from AFC, USSF and other federations is quite interesting - they want to protect local football and that&#039;s to be expected. I doubt that they know of the full details of the proposal and as such are just talking based on media speculation. 

Could their opinions change once the Premier League offers them incentives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reaction from AFC, USSF and other federations is quite interesting &#8211; they want to protect local football and that&#8217;s to be expected. I doubt that they know of the full details of the proposal and as such are just talking based on media speculation. </p>
<p>Could their opinions change once the Premier League offers them incentives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Bilal</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/week-in-review-4-11-feb-08/5792/#comment-79907</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/week-in-review-4-11-feb-08/5792/#comment-79907</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll give you that the public in general doesn&#039;t like Scudamore / doesn&#039;t like the idea of the 39th game.

IMO that still doesn&#039;t excuse the Guardian from running &lt;a href=&quot;http://football.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/0,,2256040,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this &lt;/a&gt; as it&#039;s top headline WITHOUT any perspective - McCabe has an axe to grind against Scudamore and the Premier League because of the West Ham affair and his comments, once taken in that context, lose a lot of relevance.

I can hardly disagree with Richard Williams when he craps on bloggers but to - through willful omission more than anything else - avoid any perspective in their coverage of a story is criminal.

I also think that the way the media has quickly pounced on the 39th game proposal as *such a bad idea* and quickly opposed it has had a big role to play in fanning the flames.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll give you that the public in general doesn&#8217;t like Scudamore / doesn&#8217;t like the idea of the 39th game.</p>
<p>IMO that still doesn&#8217;t excuse the Guardian from running <a href="http://football.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/0,,2256040,00.html" rel="nofollow">this </a> as it&#8217;s top headline WITHOUT any perspective &#8211; McCabe has an axe to grind against Scudamore and the Premier League because of the West Ham affair and his comments, once taken in that context, lose a lot of relevance.</p>
<p>I can hardly disagree with Richard Williams when he craps on bloggers but to &#8211; through willful omission more than anything else &#8211; avoid any perspective in their coverage of a story is criminal.</p>
<p>I also think that the way the media has quickly pounced on the 39th game proposal as *such a bad idea* and quickly opposed it has had a big role to play in fanning the flames.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

