Tottenham must evolve or sell
Daniel Levy wants the Premier League to ‘review’ the transfer system (O rly?).
Tottenham may have agreed to drop their ‘charges’ against Liverpool and Manchester United in return for 50m, a striker on loan and a donation to charity, but the scars remain and the London club are understandably furious at having their Champions League tickets ripped out of their hands.
But what will the Premier League do? There are three things they can do, none of them which will be accepted by the members.
Any rule introduced to prevent agents from hawking their players to richer clubs is going to be resisted as a restriction of trade. Regulating agents is the way to go forward but the FA and Premier League have moved at a glacial pace. The third option is to introduce better financial regulation, but that only stops leveraged takeovers a la Manchester United and Liverpool and encourages the likes of Roman Abramovich and Abu Dhabi United Group to jump into football.
Rule changes can make it easier but realistically speaking no wage caps or transfer caps will happen unless there is extremely drastic change, and the people in charge are incapable of change.
So what’s left to do? It’s up to the clubs now to create an environment where players develop a loyalty to the club and commit to working with the club for success over a few years instead of jumping ship to be successful overnight.
It’s not easy – even the biggest clubs lose players along the way, and if Tottenham think they are the only club held hostage to money this summer they are naive, delusional and sadly mistaken.
The time to complain about ‘money ruining the system’ is long gone. Now Levy and every other football chairman have to work overtime to protect their clubs against crazy money offers. How to do it? Here are 5 simple rules:
- Develop your own players – when things get tough and players don’t get games, homegrown players are more likely to stick around than players brought in when they’re older.
- Work on your branding – it may surprise you but Arsenal do NOT play the best football – however, it’s a story that sells well and Arsenal have built a strong brand around that idea, so much so that even the players buy into it. Find out what works for your club in your situation and build your brand around it.
- Value character – the pretty Portuguese boy sells a lot of shirts, for sure, but the real test for him and his club is when he starts playing again. Does he have the character to give the club 110% like before? I’m betting that he will, just as Barry will give his best to Villa and Gerrard has given his best to Liverpool. When the going gets tough, does the player honour his contract or throw a strop?
- Keep your promises, or don’t make them – clubs can get carried away when trying to buy players, promising them that they will be qualifying for the Champions League one year and winning it the next. The clubs that keep their players make them promises that can be kept.
- Build a family, not a superstar brotherhood – players generally get along – you have to if you’re training together every day – but building close ties means matching personalities, complementing abilities and creating an environment where players can work through their initial difficulties in settling in and bond together; then you’ve got the foundation for loyalty.
It’s not easy, and players will still end up leaving if you don’t meet your goals. But building a solid foundation and playing for the long term, you’ll be better placed to resist when oil money comes calling. You’ll keep more players and then stand a better chance of qualifying for/winning in Europe and then challenging for the league.
Or if all this is too difficult, sell your club to a billionaire. It’s your choice, Mr Levy.
Topics: English Premier League, Tottenham



Football News 24/7
PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESE ONE SIGNIFICANT ZILLION ZILLION ZILLION ZILLION ZILLIONAIRE PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESE BUY T . H . F . C . TO TAKE US TO INFINITY AND BEYOND , FOR SURE ENIC LEVY AND LEWIS CAN NEVER DO THIS THEY ARE FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR TOO LIGHTWEIGHT , THESE PRESENT OWNER`S ENIC LEWIS AND LEVY ARE STOPPING TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR FROM PROGRESSING THEY CAN`T COMPETE AT THE TOP LEVEL AND THEREFOR SPURS WILL NEVER CRACK THE TOP FOUR POSITION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
September 3rd, 2008 @ 13:46I agree with this analysis. I desperately DO NOT want to see Spurs owned by a world billionnaire, throwing senseless money at overpaid talent. I would rather see us build a brand based on British lads playing with passion for their team, than a load of prima donnas playing for the case, kissing the badge only to move on when the next best offer comes along.
September 3rd, 2008 @ 14:01What about a salary cap, as in US sport? This technique ensures that a much more level playing field exists for every member of the league!
September 3rd, 2008 @ 14:02JD, your caps lock and ‘E’ button seems to stuck.
September 3rd, 2008 @ 14:05Slight concerns, as a SPRUS fan myself – because over the last 3/4 years I have observed the new Board spend an enormous amount of money on a range of players and whilst I disagree to ‘buy young and improve for the future policy’, the current system, also seems wrong as we seem to be buying ‘yet to be proven players’ with too much dough. E.g. – I like Luka modric, but at £16.5m he seems way overvalued, especially if Arshawin is a mere £4m on top of that, and scores goals too.
In addition, apart from shutting the window once the season commences, it is imperative that SPURS should learn to charge more as the window deadline draws nearer, as this should encourage other clubs to buy asap rather than on day 31.
Secondly, there should be a proposal towards the transfer window generally, as I think it is essential to ERADICATE THE PRESS from Gossiping on who’s leaving or coming into any club. To do this, it is essential that the FA suggests for clubs to present their shoupping list at all windows, which should comprise of only the players the club wishes to sell and those that have requested to be transfered.
Other clubs are therefore given the right to purchase only those players that are within the lists only and no – one else. If the press spread rumours, outside about any players not on the list, the FA should sue them as they also owe both clubs and their fans RESPECT & HONESTY, as opposed to speculation.
This is my Proposal – AS A SPURS FAN
September 3rd, 2008 @ 14:35We don’t need a salary cap so much as a transfer ceiling ( say, 25 million quid per year ?). This would make some players untransferible, however, as I imagine that Milan wouldn’t part with Kaka for less than 40 m. Same goes for Cristiano Ronaldo, maybe Agüero, etc.
September 3rd, 2008 @ 14:35I think Levy has been quite cute. He knows Spurs will not get into the top 4 just yet so he is showing the current squad how difficult he will make it if they try and leave when in contract. Good on him!
September 3rd, 2008 @ 14:43Sevilla on Spurs
September 3rd, 2008 @ 14:51It seems to me the majority of players that tend to be disloyal and stroppy are the non-British ones. I think by limiting the number of foreign players allowed in a team to say 6 would kill these transfer problems almost immediately. It’s scary to think that most of the great teams in the UK could all end up bankrupt because overpriced foreign imports are killing any reasonable wage structure clubs may have. What happens if the TV money dries up? Are there really going to be 15+ billionaires interested in buying teams that play for a 1-1 scoreline, I think not. The powers that be need to stop being greedy and look at the bigger picture or the cash cow will be dead soon.
September 3rd, 2008 @ 14:55well in spain you can only have 3 non-eu players registered as first team players, any one from a spanish speaking background only takes 2 years to be naturalised instead of 5. Good system that should be done for england as well since it allows most teams to have a good mix of foreign+local and to make it fairer have a max of 10 players that are not HomeGrown(ie from the same country or trained by the club since they were young). A naturalised player obviously stops counting as a foreign player and it makes players from australia, canada and america more likely to come because they just need to spend two years to be naturalised.
September 4th, 2008 @ 10:30