<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Arsenal board should buy out Kroenke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/</link>
	<description>Football News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:17:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Why isn&#8217;t the Arsenal board going on the offensive? &#124; Soccerlens - Football News Blog</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-63358</link>
		<dc:creator>Why isn&#8217;t the Arsenal board going on the offensive? &#124; Soccerlens - Football News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-63358</guid>
		<description>[...] Time to go on the offensive?         srExecute();   Related Items from Soccerlens [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Time to go on the offensive?         srExecute();   Related Items from Soccerlens [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iqnadirshah</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-60828</link>
		<dc:creator>iqnadirshah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-60828</guid>
		<description>Why should they buy out Kronke? They should buy out Usmanov instead(which will be impossible). Keep both the devils to counter each other..........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should they buy out Kronke? They should buy out Usmanov instead(which will be impossible). Keep both the devils to counter each other&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-60786</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-60786</guid>
		<description>They only need to purchase shares to enable the directors to get to 50%+.  Much more affordable and is the only thing required to stop him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They only need to purchase shares to enable the directors to get to 50%+.  Much more affordable and is the only thing required to stop him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiralArchitect</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-60783</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiralArchitect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-60783</guid>
		<description>Its a tough decision to make. Better the devil you know than the devil you don&#039;t? Where are the responsible members of the Arsenal gonna get the money to buy him out? Does he want to be bought out?
Maybe it&#039;ll turn out to be an old school cold war b/w the american &amp; the russky, duking it out for takeover bids. This is a good news/bad news time for the Arsenal board. 

To be fair i think you&#039;re over-exagerrating the &#039;bulls-eye&#039; theory. It is a valid theory but you are basing it on a logical set of principles that you presume a lot of rich people have. There are a hell of a lot of unknowns at this point &amp; the board has to tread carefully &amp; keep its cards close to its chest.

One thing you didn&#039;t think about, much less mention, is what happens when this &#039;lockdown&#039; agreement ends next year &amp; every share is fair game again? I&#039;m sure the 2 billionaires will want to position themselves for the stampede that will result when the gates fly open in that horse race &amp; they won&#039;t mind waiting when that time comes. 

I think the board does have to spend the time until then to convince the smaller shareholders to stay in it for the long haul &amp; try to come to sort of agreement with Kroenke. You are definitely right about that &amp; at least the guy has SOME experience dealing with sports clubs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a tough decision to make. Better the devil you know than the devil you don&#8217;t? Where are the responsible members of the Arsenal gonna get the money to buy him out? Does he want to be bought out?<br />
Maybe it&#8217;ll turn out to be an old school cold war b/w the american &amp; the russky, duking it out for takeover bids. This is a good news/bad news time for the Arsenal board. </p>
<p>To be fair i think you&#8217;re over-exagerrating the &#8216;bulls-eye&#8217; theory. It is a valid theory but you are basing it on a logical set of principles that you presume a lot of rich people have. There are a hell of a lot of unknowns at this point &amp; the board has to tread carefully &amp; keep its cards close to its chest.</p>
<p>One thing you didn&#8217;t think about, much less mention, is what happens when this &#8216;lockdown&#8217; agreement ends next year &amp; every share is fair game again? I&#8217;m sure the 2 billionaires will want to position themselves for the stampede that will result when the gates fly open in that horse race &amp; they won&#8217;t mind waiting when that time comes. </p>
<p>I think the board does have to spend the time until then to convince the smaller shareholders to stay in it for the long haul &amp; try to come to sort of agreement with Kroenke. You are definitely right about that &amp; at least the guy has SOME experience dealing with sports clubs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-60781</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-60781</guid>
		<description>RearGunner I think the author was meaning the club itself buy back the shares, this &#039;lock down&#039; agreement probably isn&#039;t worth the paper its written on anyway but irregardless I don&#039;t think it would cover the scenario the author is talking about however unlikely I feel the suggestion is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RearGunner I think the author was meaning the club itself buy back the shares, this &#8216;lock down&#8217; agreement probably isn&#8217;t worth the paper its written on anyway but irregardless I don&#8217;t think it would cover the scenario the author is talking about however unlikely I feel the suggestion is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RearGunner</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-60780</link>
		<dc:creator>RearGunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-60780</guid>
		<description>The board can&#039;t purchase any shares for the time being, as part of that year lock down agreement. Not only did it mean they couldn&#039;t sell shares, it also meant they couldn&#039;t buy shares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The board can&#8217;t purchase any shares for the time being, as part of that year lock down agreement. Not only did it mean they couldn&#8217;t sell shares, it also meant they couldn&#8217;t buy shares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-60779</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/the-arsenal-board-should-buy-out-kroenke/3252/#comment-60779</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t make much difference mate, ok the club buys back Kroenkes shares but its going to cost circa 75m (all our current cash reserves) at the current share price, a price thats inflated anyway and could drastically drop 20% or so easily when the current situation settles.

In fact doing this could even play into Usmanovs hands as even after buying back these shares Usmanovs shareholding would increase from 21% to 24% and not only is he closer to the magic 50% mark but in fact it would cost him less to reach that figure and less again to get to the ultimate threshold of 75% that could enable him to wreak havoc with our balance sheet if he desired by placing his own debt on the clubs books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t make much difference mate, ok the club buys back Kroenkes shares but its going to cost circa 75m (all our current cash reserves) at the current share price, a price thats inflated anyway and could drastically drop 20% or so easily when the current situation settles.</p>
<p>In fact doing this could even play into Usmanovs hands as even after buying back these shares Usmanovs shareholding would increase from 21% to 24% and not only is he closer to the magic 50% mark but in fact it would cost him less to reach that figure and less again to get to the ultimate threshold of 75% that could enable him to wreak havoc with our balance sheet if he desired by placing his own debt on the clubs books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

