Sunil Gulati’s Tragedy or Triumph?
If you’re a US soccer fan, I’m going to ask that you take yourself back to a dark time in our nation’s soccer history. Don’t worry, I feel your pain. On June 22nd, 2006, Ghana ended any US hope of advancing to the quarterfinals of the World Cup. While many US fans point to a dubious penalty called against Oguchi Onyewu, it should be noted that the US had only scored one goal before this game, and it was an own goal at that. So it’s not as if the US had torn it up and was just the victim of a bad call. We stunk, and we were deservedly going home.
Sunil Gulati was elected President of the USSF in March 2006, but his reach and commitment to the program spanned many years before this. But it has been his time as the leader of US soccer that has come under the most scrutiny and in turn, the most ridicule and applause. There have been good moments (winning the Gold Cup in 2007 and getting into the Confederations Cup in 2009) and bad (the Copa America debacle). But there has been one moment, a defining moment in US soccer history perhaps, that may well decide whether Sunil Gulati’s time in charge of US soccer is indeed a tragedy or a triumph.
The failure to hire Jurgen Klinsmann as coach of the USMNT to me stinks as a decision made by someone who did not want to give up control of this growing empire in the United States. Let’s face it, 10-15 years from now, US soccer in the United States will be much bigger than it is now. It’s becoming more marketable, the team is getting better, and the brand is reaching out to more people.
That being said, the idea that Klinsmann wanted to change the culture of US soccer is both innovative and intelligent on his part. For too long, we were ready and willing to settle for secondary opponents, meaningless friendlies, and a complete lack of motivation. How many times have you seen us beat up on El Salvador since you’ve begun following the USMNT? Probably more times than you’ve ever wanted to.
This all brings us to today. Bob Bradley, an American, is our coach. As we watch the world evolve with international coaches, US soccer took the safe approach with someone we knew and who knew us. Will this be Sunil Gulati’s tragedy or will it be his triumph?
The tragedy of the situation could be unfolding in front of our very eyes. Who here was happy with our performances against England and Spain? Bob Bradley took this team to Europe, armed it with players like Eddie Johnson, and then sent it into battle with the idea that we should respect and fear the teams in front us. Do you think Klinsmann would have had that attitude? No way. He would have sent the players into this game with a simple message: Go for it. Bradley will not crack the whip with these players. I would never question the motivation of players, but when Eddie Johnson misses clear sitters and then looks up and smiles like it’s okay, Bradley gives him another start. You don’t fix anything by rewarding failure. Klinsmann would have seen this and sat Johnson down for the rest of the game.
How will Gulati’s decision play out in the end? I don’t know. What I do know is that this is the moment that the United States Soccer Federation cannot pass up. Bob Bradley has shown that while he is a decent coach, he does not seem to motivate the players well, and he lacks the tactical nuance needed to overcome the deficiencies of this team. This is the most talent a United States squad (except perhaps 2002) has ever had. The opportunity to do something big for soccer is today, not 5 years from now. In the end, will US soccer be a victim of Gulati’s poor judgment? Or will his judgment be right, as Bob Bradley guides us to bigger things than this country has ever seen?
Personally, I think Gulati made a terrible mistake. It’s a mistake that he will realize in 2010, as the United States goes home after the group stages again. There’s more to this game than just talent. Our coaching staff is severely limited in this aspect, and I feel that just like Bruce Arena before him, Bob Bradley will be a victim of his own lack of coaching skills. Would Klinsmann have done any better? I like to think so. For those who hate Landon Donovan, imagine him under the wing of Klinsmann. I think Donovan is our best player now, imagine if he would have Klinsmann’s words in his head.
The thing that bothers me most about this situation is that Klinsmann wanted this job. If we’re honest with ourselves, nobody in Europe respects US soccer. The players might, but coaches and the media do not. If you lose to the US, you could lose your job! Against Spain, when it was nil nil at the half, the Spanish fans were actually booing their home team because they had not beaten us already. And what do we go out and do? Lay an egg in the second half and lose the game. And Klinsmann wanted to change that attitude. Bob Bradley represents that attitude. The attitude that “It’s OK, we’re just here to give you guys a run out. We’re not actually looking to win.” Its garbage and I’m sick of it.
Do you think Klinsmann would be keeping Freddy Adu on the bench? Or putting Eddie Johnson in the lineup when he clearly doesn’t deserve to be there? I doubt it. One can only dream of where Klinsmann would have taken this team. But dreams are just that. Just a part of the imagination. The reality is US soccer is in danger of being in the exact same place it was in 2006. And it will be all Sunil Gulati’s fault. Tragedy or triumph? We shall see.
Topics: Features, Jürgen Klinsmann, USA


Football News 24/7

Hire Guus Hiddink by offering him some tax breaks…problem solved
July 15th, 2008 @ 15:34I think Klinsmann would have been the perfect choice for Team USA, and I’m upset that he wasn’t hired. Still, let’s keep things in perspective. Klinsmann has a grand total of 2 years of managerial experience. Sure, he did a great job with the German National Team, but a lot of people said that Joachim Low was the real brains behind the scenes. Plus, that German team struggled defensively and Klinsmann was accused of ignoring defense for the sake of playing offensive football. Sure, the U.S. needs more imaginative play in midfield and better finishing up front, but they can’t afford to ignore the defense.
Let’s see how he does with Bayern Munich this year before we crown him.
July 15th, 2008 @ 16:37That was an original thought i had Victor about him ignoring the defense, but our defense isn’t too bad. It could be better, but we struggle to score in open play. ALmost all of our goals come from corners and free kicks. I think Klinsmann would have made a huge difference there.
I am curious as to how he guides Bayern this year though.
July 15th, 2008 @ 16:51I don’t think Bradley has done all that bad of a job (aside from what you aptly called a debacle at Copa America), but I do agree we’d have been better off with Klinsmann.
Not only would we probably play better, but his guns blazing offensive style is something more casual American sports fans could get behind.
At least we can know that a lot of the young talent that is making US Soccer interesting right now will just be hitting their prime in 2014….
July 15th, 2008 @ 17:53Can you share with us your relationship and how long/well you know JK, BB and BA? You write like you know them so well and the exact words they are saying, so I’m guessing you’ve been on the inside with each coach.
Bruce Arena is an incredible coach and a brilliant man. We go into nearly every WC match with a decided talent disadvantage. Just being competitive is an accomplishment.
July 15th, 2008 @ 21:45I don’t know any of these men personally. I do know their results. And their results just aren’t good enough. Being competitive isn’t good enough anymore. And while I don’t disagree that Arena is an incredible coach….he wasn’t incredible when it counted.
July 16th, 2008 @ 01:15Hiring a gunslinger like Klinsmann or Capello — who would have left for greener pastures in a heartbeat — would have further retarded the growth of US soccer.
July 16th, 2008 @ 03:20Bradley has performed admirably under a ton of scrutiny and without the unqualified backing of USS. Bradley knows who his starting eleven is — the experiments with EJ and the other youngsters is 1) an attempt to look past the next tournament, and b) an effort to find an attacking player that can actually strike fear into the hearts of Mexico, England, Spain, et. al.
So you don’t know any of them, yet somehow you know the words they say. Do you have some kind of psychic powers?
Arena guided a team with inferior talent to the final eight in the world. Yet that’s not good enough for you. I think that says more about you. The ’06 team played a man down and still outplayed eventual champion Italy in what was a truly inspirational performance. They got a bad break/call against Ghana. How many players on the US team would’ve cracked the lineup on any of the other three in the group? Not many.
You guys that think a coach can come in and magically turn water into wine are completely delusional. Bruce Arena accomplished more in his career than you have ever dreamed about. And he did it in a country where he does not get to pull from a pool of the very best athletes or get great support. Bob Bradley has done fine with what he has to work with.
You should direct your efforts towards finding a way to get a larger pool of young athletes in the US involved in the sport. Until that time, you can hire any coach you want and there won’t be any great improvement.
July 16th, 2008 @ 03:29Go Terps,
When you say “you know the words they say” what part of the article are you referring too? I haven’t quoted anyone. Everything I’ve said is based off of what I see. Against England, the team came out scared. I said OK, Bradley will light a fire under them during halftime and they;ll come to play in the 2nd half. Never happened. Same against Spain.
I’m not knocking what Bruce Arena did, and perhaps I was a bit harsh on him in the article. Still, for a team that did so well in 2002, 2006 was an utter failure. Bringing in a declining Kasey Keller, not giving Clint Dempsey more games, playing Claudio Reyna, just no good all around. Bob Bradley has done a decent job…but when it counts, what’s he done? Gold Cup 2007, which we should win with anybody coaching.
Klinsmann wanted to direct our efforts towards getting a bigger talent pool. He wanted to revamp the whole youth system, but the USSF had other ideas. What can you do? I’m with you the whole way on that one bro. But its not happening.
July 16th, 2008 @ 10:52Football News You Can Trust??? Time to change this site’s tag line.
Yes, Gulati is a tool. We all know that. Anyone who listened to Gulati droul all over Klinsmann while he’s about to introduce Bradley as an “interim” coach because they were still talking to other candidates, must recognize that 1) He closed the door on other potential candidates by focusing soley on Klinsmann, 2) He doesn’t know squat about public relations, otherwise he would have issued a written statement thanking Klinsmann for participating in the selection process, waited a week, then introduced Bradley as the next coach, 3) he sent anyone else that was remotely interested in the position a clear message that you’re an also-ran compared to Klinsmann.
I’d like to know how Lomax came to the following conclusions:
“The thing that bothers me most about this situation is that Klinsmann wanted this job.” (At what point in time was this bit of imformation made public?)
“If we’re honest with ourselves, nobody in Europe respects US soccer.” (Ummm, I can think of 3 European teams off the top of my head that respect US soccer…Italy, Germany and Portugal).
“And Klinsmann wanted to change that attitude. Bob Bradley represents that attitude. The attitude that “It’s OK, we’re just here to give you guys a run out. We’re not actually looking to win.†(Really? Bob Bradley exemplifies that “We don’t mind losing” attitude? You’ve obviously never met the man)
What’s garbage is this article and I’m sick of reading crap like it.
July 18th, 2008 @ 20:33#10 – if you can’t discuss ideas calmly then you shouldn’t reading in any case.
Personally I agree with Brian on the thought that Klinsmann wanted the US job. Some information doesn’t have to be made public – and with the behind-the-scenes politicking going on in football, a lot of what happens is never made public.
However, Klinsmann could have revolutionised US football. Don’t agree that Bradly wants to lose (just as Steve McClaren didn’t actually want to lose) but in that case Brian’s frustrated, and that’s understandable.
July 19th, 2008 @ 06:45#11 – Ahmed, please note if anyone is upset, it appears to be the author of this article. I was simply paraphrazing his conclusion.
Regarding your specific points, to state that Klinsmann “wanted” the job without providince evidence to support that assumption is an example of an error that could be used when teaching Journalism 101. It’s as bad as Eric Wynalda prefacing statements with, “Right now he’s thinking…”. I would expect more from a site with the tagline, “Football News You Can Trust”.
You, Lomax, and everyone else who thinks that Klinsmann could have revolutionized US football are missing one very important point. The govering body (the USSF), is not separate from the league (MLS), or marketing (SUM). The 3-headed monster, as it is commonly refered to, is comprised of micromanagers, each with their own agenda, which makes it difficult for any coach, regardless of their qualifications, to do their job effectively.
This is a semtiment that was echoed by Bruce Arena shortly after his departure. What is widely known, and what Lomax should have mentioned in his article is that Arena and Klinsmann are friends. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that it is highly likely Arena and Klinsmann discussed the pros and cons associated with working in the USSF.
Gulati should have seen this train coming and kept the door open with other potential candidates. He didn’t, and apparently Klinsmann’s terms were unacceptable to the man we all know as the micromanaging “superfan”.
July 19th, 2008 @ 20:54