Summer Transfer Frenzy: Are Strikers Worth Their Weight in Goals?
Huntelaar - worth his weight in gold?
The summer transfer market just went off with a couple of high powered Exocet missiles from central Spain, leaving some of us thinking that nothing will ever be the same again. A seemingly obscene (vulgar even!) amount of money may be about to change hands with many of Europe’s top clubs in the market for a striker (amongst others).
Nothing excites the fan more than a proven goal-scorer donning the shirt and declaring his intent to a nose full of microphones.
Let me clarify at the outset that I am talking about strikers here not creative attacking players, regardless of how prolific they might be in terms of goals. Think in terms of the old fashioned centre-forward as opposed to the inside-right or inside-left or the No.10, a term some like to use to make the distinction. Stateside they struggle a little with this concept so I’ll stay well away from talking about ‘offensive’ players as only some of those about to be mentioned are actually that!
Carlos Tevez was the subject of much divided opinion amongst Manchester United fans recently. “Sign him up!” rang out from several tiers at Old Trafford on more than one occasion towards the end of the season and Carlos milked it to the fullest! Others, however, didn’t think him worth the money. “All perspiration and no inspiration” the other camp declared, and “he just doesn’t score enough for a striker!” or “No better than Kuyt” was the worst insult I saw levelled in this debate. Ouch!
And then there were the inevitable comparisons with Berbatov. “The wrong player was let go!” some United fans cried, whilst others insist that Berba “has far more class and talent than Carlos”. Work rate and enthusiasm score heavily in Tevez’s favour whilst a languid style and sulky demeanor weigh against Berbatov.
Down at The Emirates most Arsenal fans have seemingly lost patience with Adebayor, as it appears has Arsene. “Lazy and a bad attitude” sums up the case for the prosecution as does “No loyalty and disruptive in the dressing room.” or “With Van Persie and Arshavin in the ranks who needs him anyway…..?”
I’ve always wondered about that “disruptive in the dressing room” thing! Are we talking about the puerile pulling of teammate’s hair and flicking elastic bands at the unsuspecting or is it the more sinister practice of declaring that one has the biggest willy and constantly calling for a tape measure if challenged? Please share your thoughts if you have an insight!
Meanwhile, over at Anfield Liverpool fans will tell you that “Torres is the best pound for pound striker in the world at present” (someday they’ll go metric in the UK) and many neutrals/rivals (including yours truly) would agree with that assessment. The issue there is the need for a support/ back-up striker.
The transfer market rumour machine is out of the blocks and we hear that Benzema, Eto’o, Ibrahimovic, David Villa and Aguero could all be bought at the right price (monopoly money in all cases!). Santa Cruz has already signed for City and Tevez is likely to follow suit very soon. Real Madrid have made Huntelaar and Van Nistelrooy ‘available’ while the intentions of Ancelotti regarding Anelka and Drogba are not yet clear. Pato has aroused Chelsea’a interest and Forlan could yet come under the spotlight.
One hack even suggested, on what must have been a very slow day at the office, that Torres could be off to United! About as likely as Cashley re-signing for Arsenal or Berbatov and Adebayor turning into a couple of grinning sprinters you would have thought! And if some of you think that Baghdad looks ugly right now, put that deal through and you’ll see an instant shift of focus from President Obama regarding the world’s trouble spots!
So how do we actually rate players or, in this case, strikers? There is a certain amount of subjectivity involved but is some of it misguided? Unlike players in any other position there is a clear measurement for strikers………….…the cold currency of goals.
Goals may not be the be all and end all but they’re a damn big piece of the be all and end all if you’re a striker!
Did some fans give too much weighting to Tevez for his ‘likeability’ and work-rate? I’m with the fans who say “show me the money,” or “where’s the beef”……………. the ‘money’ and ‘beef’ in question being found, in this instance, in the ‘goals-scored’ column. Somewhere out there is a rate of goal-scoring that is such as to provoke debate and disagreement amongst fans when judging strikers and somewhere beyond that is a point where debate is benign. But where is that watershed between war and peace?
Make no mistake, 30 goals a season is a cure-all for any player/fan relationship problem you care to mention. Not wishing to demean any section of society but a one-legged cross-dressing hunchback with the moral fibre of a serial killer and a Bartonesque set of party tricks will be the first name on the team sheet every week if he’s netting at the rate of 30 goals a season, even if the begrudgers out there would constantly sneer that he’s totally one-footed (and before you write in, I accept completely that, in terms of political correctness, I haven’t a leg to stand-on on that one).
And yes, that was a rather long-winded and exaggerated way of saying that maybe Berbatov and Adebayor are being harshly judged! It depends on their goal-scoring records and where you draw the imaginary line.
We’re talking about subtle differences here, the subtle differences between the world’s best strikers…..so it’s high time I quit rambling and ‘showed you the money’, so to speak.
I’ve taken 30 current generation strikers and analysed their goals per game stats for your consumption.
But before I reveal my hand I need to be clear that I am talking about strikers. The fact that Ronaldo, Messi and Kaka would rank ‘right up there’ in this analysis is irrelevant. They’re not strikers and their goal contribution, along with everything else that they bring to the party, underlines the reason why, between them, they have won the last three ‘World Player of the Year Awards’ (OK, I spotted the mistake there but in a few months it WILL be correct and I’ll be seen as a visonary!) Ronaldo and Kaka (or in REALity you know who) have started this transfer feeding frenzy in the first place. I’ve left out Henry, Arshavin and Robinho for the same reason.
And yes, it may not be a complete list, although I’ve tried bloody hard to make it one, so if I’ve left out one of your favourites live with it. It’s representative enough to make the point (although right now I’m seriously questioning whether there actually is one!)
Note: Includes full career club and international appearances and goals.
|
|
Ratio |
Avg. Goals |
|
|
Ranking |
Player |
Games/Goals |
50 Games |
|
1 |
Huntelaar |
1.500 |
33 |
|
2 |
Van Nistelrooy |
1.614 |
31 |
|
3 |
Trezeguet |
1.863 |
27 |
|
4 |
Villa |
1.932 |
26 |
|
5 |
Shevchenko |
1.943 |
26 |
|
6 |
Fabiano |
1.989 |
25 |
|
7 |
Eto’o |
1.996 |
25 |
|
8 |
Crespo |
2.011 |
25 |
|
9 |
Toni |
2.067 |
24 |
|
10 |
Inzaghi |
2.076 |
24 |
|
11 |
Owen |
2.078 |
24 |
|
12 |
Berbatov |
2.092 |
24 |
|
13 |
Drogba |
2.147 |
23 |
|
14 |
Podolski |
2.200 |
23 |
|
15 |
Raul |
2.244 |
22 |
|
16 |
Klose |
2.260 |
22 |
|
17 |
Ibrahimovic |
2.309 |
22 |
|
18 |
Pato |
2.333 |
21 |
|
19 |
Adebayor |
2.402 |
21 |
|
20 |
Benzema |
2.403 |
21 |
|
21 |
Forlan |
2.404 |
21 |
|
22 |
Torres |
2.405 |
21 |
|
23 |
Aguero |
2.557 |
20 |
|
24 |
Totti |
2.607 |
19 |
|
25 |
Keane |
2.614 |
19 |
|
26 |
Rooney |
2.659 |
19 |
|
27 |
Tevez |
2.868 |
17 |
|
28 |
Anelka |
2.954 |
17 |
|
29 |
Van Persie |
3.121 |
16 |
|
30 |
Santa Cruz |
3.381 |
15 |
So take a minute or two to absorb that and spot where some of your favourites rank. These are the hard facts, the one true measurement we have that can’t be disputed. So what exactly does it clarify? That may come down to individual interpretation but here are some of my observations:
- Close the book on the Berbatov v Tevez debate. 7 extra goals in a 50 game season (probably equating to several vital points and/or a cup victory or 2) says it’s Berba every time. Tevez just betters 1 goal in 3 games and ranks a lowly 26th in the pecking order.
- And what about Adebayor? He’ll bag you 21 goals while Van Persie only grabs 16, worse than 1 in 3. That surprised me I have to say! And although I excluded Arshavin I can tell you that his ratio is 1 in 4, so if you’re an Arsenal fan don’t bank on many repeats of the Anfield ‘one man show’ in the future.
- If Tevez does join Man City he’ll team-up with the truly non-prolific Santa Cruz. Here’s a striker who’ll average 15 goals a season for you! And although Robinho isn’t on the list I’ve run his numbers and can tell you that at 1 goal every 2.93 games he’d come-in just behind Tevez at 28th. So Mark Hughes has bought himself 3 front men who have never worried a 20 goal a season average.
- Many people’s No.1 pick, Torres, comes in at a surprisingly low 22nd, 5 goals a season shy of his compatriot Villa and 3 short of Berbatov! So what does this tell us?
- Huntelaar at No.1! Now Ruud was not a surprise at No.2 but I was amazed at Huntelaar. A 33 goal average puts him streets ahead of some of the other top strikers. Yes, he has played most of his career in Holland but if he was wearing clogs that makes his record even more impressive, and people have said that he didn’t do it at Madrid but he’s hardly had the chance to take his coat off yet. 8 goals in 20 appearances for Real, in a very disruptive season, was not exactly shabby! Suffice to say that if I get the call from Sir Alex in the next couple of weeks and the question posed is: “Klaas-Jan Huntelaar?” my response will be a hearty “Yes, please!” … which would not have been the case last week.
- And what is Robbie Keane doing on the list you ask? Well I thought I’d include him to add a bit of spice. And no! … that’s not an implied reference to Paella, the national dish of Spain. And in mentioning the national dish of Spain if you think I’m going anywhere near any references to restaurants and Waiters you’ll be disappointed! Interesting though that Robbie can drop an average of 19 goals in a 50 game season and considering he only left 7 on the table by Christmas last year that says he still had 12 in his locker. Now if he’d stayed and produced even 4 or 5 of those 12 in that wobbly January/February period could the title now be…………………? No! Let’s not go there!
But of course you’re right!…. and I should know better! Haven’t I written about it before Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics. The above analysis is flawed!
Let’s get back to clichés! Some like to throw scorn on a good cliché but a cliché becomes what it is largely because it’s a truism. I know I’m Irish but that’s not why I’m defending the cliché ridden David O’Leary, and if I might borrow from the great man: “as I say, at the end of the day a striker is only as good as his last season.“
Never a truer word spoken! But let’s just broaden that a little and look at the stats over the last three seasons. If you’re going to splash the cash on a striker you’ll be looking in this direction rather than the above table, so take another 5 to absorb this.
Note: Only includes club appearances/goals, as trying to get an annual breakdown for international games/goals….well…almost cost me a breakdown.
|
|
|
Ratio |
Avg. Goals |
Career |
Position |
|
Ranking |
Player |
Games/Goals |
50 Games |
Position |
Change |
|
1 |
Huntelaar |
1.472 |
34 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
Van Nistelrooy |
1.476 |
34 |
2 |
0 |
|
3 |
Eto’o |
1.597 |
31 |
7 |
4 |
|
4 |
Villa |
1.730 |
29 |
4 |
0 |
|
5 |
Forlan |
1.747 |
29 |
21 |
16 |
|
6 |
Ibrahimovic |
1.758 |
28 |
17 |
11 |
|
7 |
Totti |
1.800 |
28 |
24 |
17 |
|
8 |
Trezeguet |
1.828 |
27 |
3 |
-5 |
|
9 |
Torres |
1.908 |
26 |
22 |
13 |
|
10 |
Toni |
2.004 |
25 |
9 |
-1 |
|
11 |
Drogba |
2.032 |
25 |
13 |
2 |
|
12 |
Benzema |
2.048 |
24 |
20 |
8 |
|
13 |
Inzaghi |
2.058 |
24 |
10 |
-3 |
|
14 |
Raul |
2.102 |
24 |
15 |
1 |
|
15 |
Fabiano |
2.137 |
23 |
6 |
-9 |
|
16 |
Pato |
2.195 |
23 |
18 |
2 |
|
17 |
Adebayor |
2.224 |
22 |
19 |
2 |
|
18 |
Podolski |
2.305 |
22 |
14 |
-4 |
|
19 |
Van Persie |
2.333 |
21 |
29 |
10 |
|
20 |
Klose |
2.339 |
21 |
16 |
-4 |
|
21 |
Berbatov |
2.400 |
21 |
12 |
-9 |
|
22 |
Rooney |
2.410 |
21 |
26 |
4 |
|
23 |
Crespo |
2.414 |
21 |
8 |
-15 |
|
24 |
Keane |
2.456 |
20 |
25 |
1 |
|
25 |
Aguero |
2.600 |
19 |
23 |
-2 |
|
26 |
Anelka |
2.720 |
18 |
28 |
2 |
|
27 |
Owen |
2.826 |
18 |
11 |
-16 |
|
28 |
Santa Cruz |
2.938 |
17 |
30 |
2 |
|
29 |
Tevez |
3.098 |
16 |
27 |
-2 |
|
30 |
Shevchenko |
4.208 |
12 |
5 |
-25 |
So that’s the list for buying purposes and what’s changed?
- Huntelaar holds his place at No.1! Definitely worth a punt in my view!
- And Ruud also holds onto No.2! if he can stay fit he’s gotta be worth a chance for the likes of Spurs…and was Sir Alex rash in selling him when he did?
- David Villa also holds his 4th place. No wonder everyone is interested and Eto’o also surprised me. Worth the money if Barca want to sell?
- The big negative movers from the ‘total career’ table are Fabiano, Berbatov, Crespo, Owen and Shevchenko. No surprises there except for Berbatov. Berbatov’s first season at United hurt his stats but he’s still comfortably ahead of Tevez.
- The big upward movers are Forlan, Ibra, Totti, Torres, Benzema and Van Persie.
- But Torres is still only in 9th! Considering he’s my first choice this doesn’t quite gel!
- And even though Van Persie jumps 10 places he just scrapes over the 20 goals a season mark and still trails Adebayor.
- At 28th and 29th Santa Cruz and Tevez don’t impress any more than they did on the first list.
- And what of Rooney? Being played out of position or flattering to deceive?
I could go on but by now you’re already asleep or have jumped to the response column and are about to fillet me with your razor sharp tongues.
Food for thought though?
How do you rate your strikers?









Very well written! Interesting stuff. A striker is valued on their goals and Huntelaars record speaks for itself, even the 8 in 20 at real. Players like ruud and trezeguet have stood the test of time. As an arsenal fan, the flair players dont necessarily get you the goals. Van persie n arshavin r ezamples of this. Ive always admired huntelaar, wenger probably wouldnt do it, but hed dfntly do the job. Would be interestin to see how well our “prolific” eduardo would rank if he was fit.
Hello there,
I “googled” Tevez and this link came up, I can honestly say very good article with witty comments. Do keep it up old chap. Oh and that Fergie is a derailed idiot, letting me and Beckham go, what was he thinking. He did come back up with results however, but is it going to happen again this season? I think not, with an squad that is pushing the average age up, Fergie will find it much more difficult this season. Anyway I digress, Tevez will score many goals in Man City. Watch this space.
Warmest regards
Van Nistelrooy
oh no! we have an imposter!
Imposter? How do you mean?
I honestly don’t know why Madrid wants Huntelaar out. One of the daftest criticisms of him I’ve heard from Madrid fans is that he “doesn’t create, like David Villa can”. I don’t know, but having seen Raul trying to play striker and Higuain being forced to score AND create I’d be very glad to have a striker who can put the ball in the back of the net if you can get it to him inside the area.
I think Van Nistelrooy is still potent, but I can understand why they want to move him on, with his injury record and his age, especially in light of the changes taking place at Real Madrid. However I think we’re stupid if Huntelaar isn’t wearing white at the start of the season. Sadly I think he’ll be moving on.
If you consider that most of Huntelaar’s career has been in the Eredivisie, and that most of Villa’s has been in La Liga, then Villa looks more impressive especially when you see that his international scoring ratio is higher than Huntelaar’s. But that also points to how potent Van Nistelrooy has been in every league he’s played in.
This is a very good article and shows how it isnt how some people would think. I think Torres is world class but I feel the only reason people believe this is because he is one of the only striker doing anything in the premier league right now. Every striker in the league has some input but no-one has quite dominated the league on the goal scoring list. Ronaldo, a midfielder, has out shown most of the strikers. I wonder how a list would compare with the others if it was down to stats in the premier league. Because the league is one of the most fastest competitive leagues in the world and I would like to see how strikers in this league compare. (For eg. Shevchenkos AC Milan stats compared to his Chelsea stats would be interesting to see)
pretty interesting stats. huntelaar is difinitely worth the money for any interested club ,though, i would like to see him prove it through a full season in another league like van nistelrooy did. maybe united should inquire the possibilities for huntelaar as well as bring in benzema. rooney’s numbers i think is not very indicative of his value as he tracks back away from his penciled/designated position more than any other forward i’ve seen. next season maybe will see as his play for england so far this time have shown more goals at centre forward. anyway, thanks for the info.
How do goals come without creating it?
You talk about strikers who score goals yes thats what they are supposed to do but do they create any like Rooney or Van persie, villa and the best striker this season even if he hasen’t scored I’ve been a fan of him “Torres”.
Talk about adebayor and toni they just sit front of goal never likely to defend nor go past defenders. what about a team has two strikers who score 20-30 goals each and don’t defend then concede 50-60 goals. Torres, Rooney do it all the time now but even i’ve seen tevez in his won box defending and trying to get the ball.
Now Tevez scores less goals than others but he scores vital ones. If he wasn’t there for Man U the previous season then they would never had won the champions league. wanna bet. So how do you see a striker as?
In my opinion he must
first assist goals and score as many as you can, don’t be selfish.
Secondly defend as a team than staying up front is like his team playing with 10 men so play as a team rather than a lonely striker who complains he has got no support having the ball.
A very thought provoking article which got me thinking about why Torres is so keen for his fellow countryman to play alongside him @ Anfield. PrettyP makes a great point that in the EPL a lot more midfielders are playing in the pocket like a second striker like Gerrard, Lampard, Fabregas & Ronaldo and scoring a lot of goals phasing out the 4-4-2 system in favour of the 4-1-3-1 thus pushing guys like Huntelaar to the midfield, this may explain why Real thought he wasn’t a creative striker? fearflash makes a good point about Rooney being an industrious player defending in front of the back 4,which would put him in the holding midfielders roll. It begs the question if their numbers as a striker are down on goal count are their numbers up when it comes to assists? Maybe we’ll leave that for another day!
Interesting how will Shevchenko has done even though he was horrid at Chelsea and his horrid with his loan at Milan. Diego Forlan might be higher if it wasn’t for his time at Man U. With that said I think it would of been better to take into account the last 5 seasons or so of the players because again Shev’s stats are completely off. If you buying Shev to get back on form look at the AC Milan days but if you looking at now well look at the Milan Loan plus Chels. And age does make a difference. Owen might be way up the pecking order if it wasn’t for Newcastle injuries and the Real Madrid graveyard.
I think the reason why van Persie is so low on the career list is because he was a winger in his Feyenoord time and still is in the Oranges.
International career is probably also the reason why Berba is so high. He has the best goals/games rate internationally having scored 41 goals in 68 matches. Huntelaar has only scored 13 in 23 matches, for example (although he did score an amazing 18 goals in 22 matches for U-21).
Also, Mutu seems to be missing. He’s played a lot, and scored a lot as well, with a games/goals rate of 2.413 over the whole of his career, which is quite impressive.
goals are a useful indicator of a striker but not be all.
For instance berbatov scored more goals in less appearances then tevez but he also had a much greater assist tally.
Some strikers are pure goal scorers who are generally in the penalty area to get goals.
Torres is the kind of striker who provides more then just goals, he by being fast and strong keeps both CB’s busy and opens up the game for kuyt and gerrard.
Same goes for drogba and to an extent adebayor and berba.
They are the focal points of the central attack and are there to bring team mates into the game.
@Brandon: Thanks for the comment and I can tell you that Eduardo’s career stats are highly impressive:
In table 1 he’d come in at No.2 with a highly impressive 1 goal in every 1.55 games or 32 in a 50 game season. But in table 2 he’d come in at a clear No.1! 1 goal in every 1.317 games or 38 in a 50 game season(remarkable, and helped by his incredible 45 goals in 44 games in his last season at Zagreb). Even in his limited Arseanl career (only 35 games) he scores 1 in 2.333 which is exactly the same as Van Persie.
Thanks for pointing that out….those numbers are scary!
@PrettyP: Shevchenko’s Milan stats, ignoring last season’s loan spell, are 30 goals in a 50 game season compared to just half that(15 in a 50 game season) at Chelsea.
@Jake: Agree totally but I suppose the point is that the likes of Owen and Shevchenko were top strikers in their day but are now past their sell by date!
@ish: Spot on! This analysis was never going to be conclusive on anything and your points are well made. I said I rated Torres as my number one and you make an excellent point as to why that’s still a valid choice despite him not topping the stats.
Fantastic article!
Important to note for Chelsea fans that Anelka is no.4, surely that provides backing that he is better than Drogba?
Apologies, said the wrong thing completely!
Meant to say – Drogba is 13 and 11, surely that’s a case not to sell him?
Destrier: You are right, somewhat, in that in the grey area between a 4-4-2 and a 4-2-3-1, a midfielder in a very advanced position can effectively be performing as a second striker, or vice versa. The difference, as it applies to Madrid, is that it is not Huntelaar, but Higuain, who is dropping back to be a creative midfielder. We had a very strange situation last season where we often had no true targetman on the pitch. I believe Raul was meant to act as one, but he’s not as clinical as he used to be and not as ruthless as Huntelaar and Van Nistelrooy. Also, he tends to drop back to get involved in play when he’s not getting the ball. What I saw last season was the midfielders being unable to put the ball through to the strikers, so Higuain would drop into midfield to try to get the ball himself, and then look up and see that there was no targetman to put the ball through to! Neither Higuain nor Raul are aerially outstanding, so Marcelo and Robben tended to cut inside instead of cross. As for our stable of creative midfielders, they didn’t quite work out. Sneijder had lots of problems last season and Guti was himself. Van Der Vaart has actually been the most efficient in creating assists, but he simply wasn’t played.
So we had a case where Higuain was essential to both scoring and creating goals. I’ve said elsewhere that if you don’t count penalties, Higuain and Huntelaar scored an average of one goal every 146 minutes last season. But when you do a direct comparison between Higuain and Huntelaar, Huntelaar’s statistics look inferior because Higuain has more assists, and is more involved in play in general. This is why I think Huntelaar comes across as not being a creative player. Creating is not what he does best, but no one can doubt he’s very, very good at scoring goals. I still wonder what would have happened if Juande Ramos had the guts to bench Raul and play Higuain and Huntelaar up front, forming a true 4-2-3-1. Imagine Higuain, Robben, Marcelo, Ramos, and Lass all feeding Huntelaar from everywhere on the pitch!
Most of the top players on this list are 30 and up. More are 27 and up. Torres is only 25, and his stats are approaching those of guys who have been around much longer. Most of Huntelaar’s goals were for the Dutch league, and I believe that he has not been with a top European team long enough. I like Huntelaar and Torres (treacherously I am an Arsenal fan), but Torres will be higher on the list in the years to come. He has great years ahead of him, unlike many of the players on the list.
@Ryan: I understand your point but that can actually cut both ways. For example, the biggest fallers in terms of average from the career list to the last 3 years list included Fabiano, Crespo, Owen and Shevchenko. In all of these cases their stats have fallen away as they’ve passed their peak and are no longer as prolific as when they were younger.
Very good article, cheers for that. Two things though:
I like Huntelaar a lot, and it tends to somewhat irk me to hear the criticism “oh, but he’s only played in Holland so far”, as this is often meant to imply he can’t cut it at a higher level. But I am of the opinion that for a player of his ilk this is a rather irrelevant point. It’s true that he’s not an incredibly technical, modern centre-forward that creates his own chances; instead, he’s the ultimate goal poacher. But the skill to be good off the ball, the ability to be in the right place at the right time every time is the same, whether in the Spanish league or in the Dutch.
I can understand, and agree to, your decision not to include players like Ronaldo and Arshavin into this. But I would argue that players like Rooney and Van Persie fall into the same category.
Just hoping that Huntelaar and Van Nistelrooy will join a new club (i hope in England) where they can prove their scoring skills each week. Can’t wait to hear the good news!!
P.S. Maybe other interesting post to read on Huntelaar:
http://www.oleole.com/blogs/realmadridtalk/posts/is-selling-huntelaar-the-right-thing-to-do