<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 2009 Soccerlens Awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soccerlens.com/soccerlens-awards-2009/37240/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soccerlens.com/soccerlens-awards-2009/37240/</link>
	<description>Football News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:36:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gennady Udod</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/soccerlens-awards-2009/37240/#comment-124229</link>
		<dc:creator>Gennady Udod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/?p=37240#comment-124229</guid>
		<description>When are the 2010 Soccerlens Awards ? This time make sure to pick www.footyroom.com It&#039;s much more better than footytube or 101greatgoals !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When are the 2010 Soccerlens Awards ? This time make sure to pick <a href="http://www.footyroom.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.footyroom.com</a> It&#8217;s much more better than footytube or 101greatgoals !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell S</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/soccerlens-awards-2009/37240/#comment-122704</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/?p=37240#comment-122704</guid>
		<description>Hard to understand why goal.com was nominated and voted best of anything. The site is little more than rewritten reports from other organisations by &quot;reporters&quot; who have little or no experience other than being uber fans. Poor editing, poor writing and little of anything newsworthy that hasn&#039;t already been reported by other outlets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to understand why goal.com was nominated and voted best of anything. The site is little more than rewritten reports from other organisations by &#8220;reporters&#8221; who have little or no experience other than being uber fans. Poor editing, poor writing and little of anything newsworthy that hasn&#8217;t already been reported by other outlets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

