WestHam broke TWO Premier League rules.

Rule one concerned full disclosure to the Prem League which West Ham didn’t do.

Rule two concerned 3rd party INFLUENCE – not ownership, which IS allowed under Prem League rules.

At no point was Tevez an ILLEGAL or ILLEGIBLE player for West Ham. Don’t believe me? Read the full report from the original case, I did.

Secondly, Kabba played 14 out of Watford’s last 15 games… The only one that he didn’t was against Shef U!! The reason that Prem League didn’t investigate was that all the evidence was circumstantial as cleverly there was nothing written into the contract.

I disagree with Rob Parker about Shef U letting go. If they were genuinely hard-done by, they should keep going.

However, the fact that they went down is all down to themselves, nothing to do with West Ham. That’s like Chelsea blaming their failure to win the Champions League on Man U winning it.. well, derr!

Explain this to me Ian, Adam and any other Shef U sympathisers; At the orginal case, West Ham ADMITTED that they had broken the rules. They did this BEFORE they knew what the outcome would be.

The panel sitting decided AFTER this fact to FINE them and NOT to deduct points.

Why is that West Ham’s fault?

A draw would have indeed saved us, but then again you are working on the assumption that all the teams were playing on an even field.
They weren’t. West Ham had cheated. Got away with a paltry fine and told that Tevez couldn’t play again if he was owned by a 3rd party. He was, he did play again and scored the winner away at Man U and those 3 points kept West Ham up.

I suggest you check your facts before bringing up Kabba at Watford.
This is a quote from Watford FC at the time of the allegations:

“We have yet to receive any notification or requests from the Premier League regarding the transfer of Steve Kabba to Watford Football Club from Sheffield United” before puncturing the whole thing anyway by saying “We can confirm that there was no written clause in any documentation relating to Steve Kabba that stipulated he could not play against Sheffield United…All contracts are vetted and approved by the Premier League prior to the player’s registration” (13).

The Premier League never investigated because there was nothing to investigate. There was no agreement and Kabba didn’t play because he wasn’t getting into the first time at that time. He hardly didget into the first team and is at Blackpool now.

I suggest you look down and take note of all those straws you are desperately trying to cling on to!

You are right, there will be more hearings now and maybe one of them will be about the playing of an illegal player called Kaba from Sheffield Utd