Comments on: Why Liverpool should be 2 points ahead of Chelsea and why West Ham should have lost by 4 goals…

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:34:22 +0000

no of this written are making sence because is elther you win or you lose. so let us not capitalise on what would have happen after it happened. now between chelsea and wiger it was a game of football chelsea won. so peter cech pushing was not pushing really he protected himself why the boyce run to him to do undo which can result to something else. As a player who want to score such a goal shouldn’t go for goalkeeper he go for ball.

By: Nathan

Nathan — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:45:08 +0000

IF WIGAN MISSED OUT ON A PANALTY, THEN SO DID BLACKBURN ROVERS AGAINST HULL. THEREFORE PUTTING ROVERS ON 6 POINTS, SO IT MEANS NOT ONLY LIVERPOOL ON 6. IDIOTS

By: Tom

Tom — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:34:27 +0000

If you are honestly to yourself many things should have been. Villa should lead the premier league and liverpool should have been relegated last season if it was up to me. So please GROW UP

By: shea_rooney

shea_rooney — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:10:02 +0000

in the man united match vs portsmouth wayne rooney should have had a goal when the assistant give ofside when rooney was nearly a yard onside

dats bad refering

By: Jolly

Jolly — Tue, 26 Aug 2008 02:46:25 +0000

JP for the record there were numerous stoppages in extra time for the liverpool game. injury time didnt even start until 91 mins and 10 secs had elapsed. There was a further delay after the goal was scored. The time keeping was actually spot on and i am not just saying that as a liverpool fan

By: JP

JP — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:56:40 +0000

I thought it was very kind of the referee to let liverpool score in the 5th minute of the 4 minutes allowed for stoppage time. New stop watch required?

By: What?

What? — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:40:55 +0000

I’d just like to say ditto to all the above posts, stupid article, stupid calls, just stupid in general.

By: Will

Will — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:34:21 +0000

I don’t see how the Cech incident constitutes a penalty. Cech is standin in his goalmouth as Boyce runs backwards into him. Cech braces himself against Boyce to avoid being knocked down. Boyce spins off Cech.

What was Cech supposed do? Was he supposed to be steamrollered over from a guy running straight into him? Should he have got out of the way? Someone explain why Cech commited any foul.

By: Johnny

Johnny — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:21:32 +0000

Oh thats funny… typical Liverpool trying to get themselves to the top of the league, as they know itll be the only time they will be their all season. And actually did you watch liverpools first two games???? They were completely dominated in BOTH. Against Sunderland and Middlesborough. Sorry, no league again this year, and also 18 for UTD.. Loverly

By: d_j_t_bass

d_j_t_bass — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:14:02 +0000

you have gotta be some scummy scouse fan with that crappy table of urs why not mention villa vs stoke we should have had a pen before them if we had scored before them then who knows what outcome it would have change to but surely deserves a mention