<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arsenal 2nd, Chelsea 3rd, Everton 4th, Liverpool 5th &#8211; How much of a difference did bad refereeing make this season?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/</link>
	<description>Soccerlens - Football News You Can Trust</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:26:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://soccerlens.com/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Everton Carter</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/comment-page-1/#comment-89580</link>
		<dc:creator>Everton Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/#comment-89580</guid>
		<description>Do People actually read how the right result works? It doesn&#039;t claim to be definitive, only to show what may have happened if perfectly good goals had been allowed to stand, and &quot;bad&quot; goals been rightfully dissallowed. It also states that it assumes all penalties are scored (stating that is because 80% or more ARE scored). Whilst the RR table cannot be definitive it DOES show which teams have benifitted more from poor decisions, AND which teams have suffered more. They ignore cards as you cannot correlate booings sendings off to goals. 

Whilst you can&#039;t sy that Everton would definately have finished higher than Liverpool had the GOAL related decisions gone for them, you can see that the &quot;Decisions even themselves out&quot; myth doesn&#039;t hold water for them or most other teams in the league.

Any football fan worth his / her salt has had passionate arguments about dodgy decisions for / against their teams, all RR has done is to store those arguments week byt week and create a table. 

The Livepool fans, for example, are you saying none of you were complaining, and thinking where&#039;d you be with 2 extra points when Chelsea got that &quot;ghost&quot; penalty against you at the start of the season? Again to use Everton as an example it is unlikely that Blackburn would have equalised had AJ&#039;s goal stood in that game as it was the dying seconds and Everton have the best defence in the Pl in 2008, similarly had Everton gone 2-0 up against West Ham in the 12th minute at Goodison it is far more likely that they would have gone on to win by an even bigger margin, than it was Everton would concede 2 goals, for the 1st time in over 3 months.

Take it for what it is, and look at it logically, unless you really never do discuss dodgy decisions?

&quot;hand of God&quot; anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do People actually read how the right result works? It doesn&#8217;t claim to be definitive, only to show what may have happened if perfectly good goals had been allowed to stand, and &#8220;bad&#8221; goals been rightfully dissallowed. It also states that it assumes all penalties are scored (stating that is because 80% or more ARE scored). Whilst the RR table cannot be definitive it DOES show which teams have benifitted more from poor decisions, AND which teams have suffered more. They ignore cards as you cannot correlate booings sendings off to goals. </p>
<p>Whilst you can&#8217;t sy that Everton would definately have finished higher than Liverpool had the GOAL related decisions gone for them, you can see that the &#8220;Decisions even themselves out&#8221; myth doesn&#8217;t hold water for them or most other teams in the league.</p>
<p>Any football fan worth his / her salt has had passionate arguments about dodgy decisions for / against their teams, all RR has done is to store those arguments week byt week and create a table. </p>
<p>The Livepool fans, for example, are you saying none of you were complaining, and thinking where&#8217;d you be with 2 extra points when Chelsea got that &#8220;ghost&#8221; penalty against you at the start of the season? Again to use Everton as an example it is unlikely that Blackburn would have equalised had AJ&#8217;s goal stood in that game as it was the dying seconds and Everton have the best defence in the Pl in 2008, similarly had Everton gone 2-0 up against West Ham in the 12th minute at Goodison it is far more likely that they would have gone on to win by an even bigger margin, than it was Everton would concede 2 goals, for the 1st time in over 3 months.</p>
<p>Take it for what it is, and look at it logically, unless you really never do discuss dodgy decisions?</p>
<p>&#8220;hand of God&#8221; anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/comment-page-1/#comment-89461</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 03:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/#comment-89461</guid>
		<description>Although I applaud what Right Result are doing, it&#039;s all a bit irrelevant. They can&#039;t say what would have happened later if a certain decision hadn&#039;t been wrong. They present a good case for increased technological assistance for referees, but you can hardly say &quot;Liverpool shouldn&#039;t have qualified for the Champions League&quot;. You can just say that Lverpool had a significant number of decisions go their way. 

Hopefully within the next two years we&#039;ll have hawkeye for goalline decisions and perhaps an appeals system like in tennis for cards, penalties etc, where you only get a certain number and you can only use them if the referee has already stopped play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I applaud what Right Result are doing, it&#8217;s all a bit irrelevant. They can&#8217;t say what would have happened later if a certain decision hadn&#8217;t been wrong. They present a good case for increased technological assistance for referees, but you can hardly say &#8220;Liverpool shouldn&#8217;t have qualified for the Champions League&#8221;. You can just say that Lverpool had a significant number of decisions go their way. </p>
<p>Hopefully within the next two years we&#8217;ll have hawkeye for goalline decisions and perhaps an appeals system like in tennis for cards, penalties etc, where you only get a certain number and you can only use them if the referee has already stopped play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harasuke</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/comment-page-1/#comment-89445</link>
		<dc:creator>harasuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 18:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/#comment-89445</guid>
		<description>why don&#039;t u not all agree refs are generally shit... n that manchester utd buys them????   nah jokes (and foul language) apart, u&#039;ve got to admire the time people can lose making such deluded (un)stats when there is a whole world o misery out there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why don&#8217;t u not all agree refs are generally shit&#8230; n that manchester utd buys them????   nah jokes (and foul language) apart, u&#8217;ve got to admire the time people can lose making such deluded (un)stats when there is a whole world o misery out there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/comment-page-1/#comment-89380</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/#comment-89380</guid>
		<description>&gt; CHelsea got penalty against usâ€¦for ball to handâ€¦not hand to ballâ€¦this was not penalty in previosu cfc games against them

Oh, come on... That was *blatantly* handball - just watch the defender&#039;s next three steps and tell me he doesn&#039;t look just like a kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Otherwise, it would be a 50-50 - because of that reaction, though, it&#039;s unthinkable to suggest the ref could give any other decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; CHelsea got penalty against usâ€¦for ball to handâ€¦not hand to ballâ€¦this was not penalty in previosu cfc games against them</p>
<p>Oh, come on&#8230; That was *blatantly* handball &#8211; just watch the defender&#8217;s next three steps and tell me he doesn&#8217;t look just like a kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Otherwise, it would be a 50-50 &#8211; because of that reaction, though, it&#8217;s unthinkable to suggest the ref could give any other decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liverpool_Fan</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/comment-page-1/#comment-89376</link>
		<dc:creator>Liverpool_Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/#comment-89376</guid>
		<description>Who is to say what decisions are right or wrong I mean going back to the Mascha sending off three quarters of the footballing population thought that was the right decision but yet a certain Wayne Rooney never seems to get booked for blatantly swearing at the officals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is to say what decisions are right or wrong I mean going back to the Mascha sending off three quarters of the footballing population thought that was the right decision but yet a certain Wayne Rooney never seems to get booked for blatantly swearing at the officals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MUFC TRUE FAN FROM MANCHESTER</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/comment-page-1/#comment-89339</link>
		<dc:creator>MUFC TRUE FAN FROM MANCHESTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/#comment-89339</guid>
		<description>some of u dont kno wot ur goin on about....how the h**l did it help united win the premier league. we had the most prob with referees:

here are some reminders!!!!
 &gt; during the blackburn game, we shud have had 3 penalties-ref was demoted to second division game because he messed up

&gt; CHelsea got penalty against us...for ball to hand...not hand to ball...this was not penalty in previosu cfc games against them

&gt; As soon as ronaldo came on we were attacking a corner and john terry was all over ronaldo, ronaldo beat him and terry was holding him back, pushing him!!! This is shocking.shud have been a penalty for us

&gt;FA CUP game against portsmouth was destroyed because players became frustrated with ref - The game was decided by the decision not to give us a penalty

NEED I CONTINUEEE?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some of u dont kno wot ur goin on about&#8230;.how the h**l did it help united win the premier league. we had the most prob with referees:</p>
<p>here are some reminders!!!!<br />
 &gt; during the blackburn game, we shud have had 3 penalties-ref was demoted to second division game because he messed up</p>
<p>&gt; CHelsea got penalty against us&#8230;for ball to hand&#8230;not hand to ball&#8230;this was not penalty in previosu cfc games against them</p>
<p>&gt; As soon as ronaldo came on we were attacking a corner and john terry was all over ronaldo, ronaldo beat him and terry was holding him back, pushing him!!! This is shocking.shud have been a penalty for us</p>
<p>&gt;FA CUP game against portsmouth was destroyed because players became frustrated with ref &#8211; The game was decided by the decision not to give us a penalty</p>
<p>NEED I CONTINUEEE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noblelox</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/comment-page-1/#comment-89334</link>
		<dc:creator>Noblelox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/#comment-89334</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all very good, but it&#039;s hardly factual is it?  Football is a sport with a foundation built on clichÃ©s... It was a game of two halves, he gave 110% and the referee changed the outcome of the match.  Blaming the ref is a get out of gaol free card to managers and fans alike.  You simply can&#039;t claim that a bad decision by the ref or linesman created a different outcome.  Even if a goal is disallowed in the 89th minute, you can&#039;t say with certainty that the other team couldn&#039;t just run up the pitch and score another goal.  It&#039;s like saying &quot;he would have scored if the linesman hadn&#039;t flagged him offside&quot; all because the ball ended in the net, what the event doesn&#039;t take into account is that the goalkeeper  didn&#039;t bother trying to save it because he has seen the flag go up or the ref whistles.  He may well have saved it if the flag never went up.

And this table is just the same.  Just because one goal never stood, or did stand when it shouldn&#039;t, doesn&#039;t meant the  match wouldn&#039;t have had the same outcome...  OK a goal is not given, who is to say that team simply score 15 minutes later?  Just because they didn&#039;t in reality, doesn&#039;t mean they wouldn&#039;t of, if the goal was cancelled out?

The table is an interesting conversational point, but nothing more, mathematics as with football is far more complex than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all very good, but it&#8217;s hardly factual is it?  Football is a sport with a foundation built on clichÃ©s&#8230; It was a game of two halves, he gave 110% and the referee changed the outcome of the match.  Blaming the ref is a get out of gaol free card to managers and fans alike.  You simply can&#8217;t claim that a bad decision by the ref or linesman created a different outcome.  Even if a goal is disallowed in the 89th minute, you can&#8217;t say with certainty that the other team couldn&#8217;t just run up the pitch and score another goal.  It&#8217;s like saying &#8220;he would have scored if the linesman hadn&#8217;t flagged him offside&#8221; all because the ball ended in the net, what the event doesn&#8217;t take into account is that the goalkeeper  didn&#8217;t bother trying to save it because he has seen the flag go up or the ref whistles.  He may well have saved it if the flag never went up.</p>
<p>And this table is just the same.  Just because one goal never stood, or did stand when it shouldn&#8217;t, doesn&#8217;t meant the  match wouldn&#8217;t have had the same outcome&#8230;  OK a goal is not given, who is to say that team simply score 15 minutes later?  Just because they didn&#8217;t in reality, doesn&#8217;t mean they wouldn&#8217;t of, if the goal was cancelled out?</p>
<p>The table is an interesting conversational point, but nothing more, mathematics as with football is far more complex than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FF</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/comment-page-1/#comment-89318</link>
		<dc:creator>FF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/#comment-89318</guid>
		<description>I was there first.

My web site does the same thing for the Champions League starting with the 2005 - 06 season. The coincidence is a bit too much.

FF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there first.</p>
<p>My web site does the same thing for the Champions League starting with the 2005 &#8211; 06 season. The coincidence is a bit too much.</p>
<p>FF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GOONER 4 LIFE</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/comment-page-1/#comment-89313</link>
		<dc:creator>GOONER 4 LIFE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/#comment-89313</guid>
		<description>Well well well the gunners have and are being screwed and I thought that i was a little crazy. Gooners are not annoying we tell it as it is. GET WELL SOON EDU. Arsenal where we kick ass for free. come get some you no good piece of shites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well well well the gunners have and are being screwed and I thought that i was a little crazy. Gooners are not annoying we tell it as it is. GET WELL SOON EDU. Arsenal where we kick ass for free. come get some you no good piece of shites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utsav</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/comment-page-1/#comment-89312</link>
		<dc:creator>Utsav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/right-result-07-08/7409/#comment-89312</guid>
		<description>Everyone can crib as much as they want. Point is,, we won... Champions!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone can crib as much as they want. Point is,, we won&#8230; Champions!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
