Search Menu

Rash Tackles and Inconsistent Referees Challenge MLS

Share

The rash fouls and referee rants started early in MLS this year.

There were seven sending offs this past weekend in relatively unimportant MLS match-ups. In the contest between the hapless Galaxy and Chivas USA, the referee red-carded LA’s US international star Gregg Berhalter in his MLS debut for hauling down a player with a clear goal-scoring opportunity, and ejected the Galaxy’s Alan Gordon (dissent) and Chivas’ Paulo Nagamura with two yellow cards apiece.

The Sounders’ Kasey Keller was ejected for handling the ball outside the box, and San Jose’s Shea Salinas jettisoned from the Fire match. Houston’s Mike Chabala was booked with reckless challenge and punted, as was Carlos Johnson of the floundering NY Red Bulls.

The plethora of cards early in the season might represent a crackdown by the league. The ejections were for several offenses, but it’s clear the players were testing the water because of MLS referees’ reputation for inconsistently calling games.

MLS is a fast, athletic league and technical players valued, but not protected. There’s no shortage of quality players, but also no shortage of marginal players who’ll do whatever it takes to win the ball. Most compromised are skilled players likely to score or outplay, often from foreign leagues where the emphasis is more technical.

There are also trophy tackles by ambitious young players, such as the assault by FC Dallas’ Adrian Serioux on David Beckham. With quality players at a premium in MLS, some protection for more technical players may be warranted.

Lack of player discipline challenges referees

chris albright 150x150 Rash Tackles and Inconsistent Referees Challenge MLSChris Albright, a former national team player currently with the New England Revolution, is a veteran of the American game and has won three MLS Cups with the LA Galaxy and DC United.

“The referees are working on it,” said Albright after practice Wednesday. “I think a lot of the issue is not many of the referees here have played at a high level and not been around the game, it’s not woven through life here as it is in Europe so those referees have a better feel. Our guys are catching up, the players and referees are working out the kinks, still have a ways to go, but just having a better feel is the biggest issue.”

“We’re a physical league so we have to be careful to try to keep it clean,” said Albright. “But that being said, you just can’t go throwing guys out left and right – that’s why it all comes back to feel, it all comes back to understanding what’s going on in the game, what time it is, how much time is left, and if there was more intent in a foul.”

The sometimes arbitrary nature of cautions has game-changing consequences in MLS. Last season a referee ejected Jeff Larentowicz in the 7th minute for a cleats-up tackle with no player contact and that decision resulted in a 4-0 loss to the Chicago Fire. The following week, the same referee punished Houston’s Ricardo Clark for a cleats-up tackle with physical harm but only gave him a yellow. The affect of these conflicting decisions gives the referee less authority down the road.

The referee’s job seems straightforward until things run afoul.

1) Let them play – Let players work things out, govern themselves, gifted athletes, they want to play at the highest level.

2) Control the game – Let players know their boundaries from the beginning. The first raised elbow gets a card. Result? In theory, no more raised elbows.

Why do these two philosophies go wrong? Dogmatic adherence to one or the other as opposed to a good feel of the game.

Philosophy #1 gone wrong – If player A’s sub is warming up on the sidelines and player A doesn’t make an impact in the next few minutes, he can find himself without a job. So player A comes in hard, then player B pulls a jersey, then players C and D go from bad to worse. Then the referee is forced to pass out cards for offenses he previously overlooked just to keep the game under control.

Philosophy #2 gone wrong – The referee becomes the 23rd player, showing cards early to make his point then refrains from cautions in the second half, suddenly aware that 9v10 players makes a poor game.

How to improve the consistency of the calls

Andrea Canales at Goal suggests increasing the talent pool for US referees through a short-term exchange program with foreign referees. Bringing in experienced foreign talent is a good idea, but only for the long term, as short–term referees will likely increase the inconsistency between games and referees.

Another suggestion is to lighten up on the diving calls, which MLS referees make quickly and effectively; diving in MLS pales in comparison to South American leagues where it’s cultivated as an art. Comparatively, is it that wrong for a targeted player to preempt an attack from a sub-par player at first touch?

If the referees relax their strict standards here a little, they may not have to eject players and call for trainers as frequently. In a long-established league, this might not be necessary, but with the wide variety of talent circulating in MLS, it may be worth offering the best players a little more protection.

Comments (4)

  1. The author’s statement about diving and “…is it so wrong…” is 180 degrees outside of where the rest of the world is going. Although players cultivate the talent to gain an advantage, spectators and FIFA officials around the world are trying to eliminate this. It takes away from the skills and the flow of the game and turns it into a “how can I trick the referee right now?”

    This completely ignores the fact that on replay their dive will be seen by everyone (including the referee later) and noted for future use against the player’s reputation. Diving needs to be eliminate as much as possible, although it never will. It will simply become more refined or, for those that can’t pull it off, a bigger source of cards.

  2. Jim,

    You have to take that conjecture in context – “Comparatively, is it so wrong . . .” Click on Serioux/Beckham clip above for illustration. Diving is not a great alternative, but quality players can’t play well if they’re being hacked down. All things considered, your suggestion?

  3. Well the red cards mentioned here were all completely routine calls given the situation (“last man” foul by Berhalter, handling outside the area by Keller), which kind of refutes all the talk of an MLS “crackdown”.

    Not to mention that it does not exemplify inconsistency. Nor does anything mentioned here, in fact.

    I agree with the above commenter about diving. The absolute last thing the league should do is ignore diving. Diving is the worst thing about soccer and a cause around which soccer haters everywhere rally. Calling for refs to not penalize it is quite possibly the stupidest thing anybody could suggest.

  4. jim s, he si right. in spain, brazil it is an art, like the guy says. it is why the reaction of robben, riera etc to diving accusations, and ronaldo, is so labelled with confusion. anger is directed towards referees in these nations when a dive results in a penalty, not a player.

    it is considered part of the game. their attitude to diving is comparable with our attitude to the hard men of the game, and visa versa. they see the hard man as techncially lacking and brutes/thugs. we see the diving little messi-like figure as a cheat, a prancing whatever. both are morally questionable, but receive different reactions all over the world.

    thus, the uthor makes a true point and i should check your facts before critising the article.