Search Menu

Is Negative Football The Future?

Share

You would think that having a season ticket at Old Trafford would mean seeing exciting matches every week.

When clubs come to our ground, we mockingly sing about it being their cup final (don’t dismiss that as arrogance, it is as much as response of frustration at being told none of us are from Manchester!) and with that as the setting, you would think our opposition would come out fighting.

For most players, they are playing in front of the biggest crowd they will see for the entire season, against the club with the Premiership and European Cup in the trophy cabinet, and you’d imagine they would want to make an impression here, have an impact.

Bolton came to Old Trafford to defend, picking up just 25% of the possession, with 2 shots on target to United’s 13, 4 shots off target to United’s 10.

West Brom saw more of the ball, with 40% possession, yet had just 2 shots on target to United’s 9, 4 shots off target to our 7.

West Ham enjoyed 41% of the ball, 2 shots on target and 3 off, whilst United had 9 on, 7 off. Stoke then took the crown as the worst team to come to Old Trafford this season, losing 5-0 after failing to get a single shot on target and just 2 off. They had a pitiful 32% possession.

With every passing week I’d be sure this team were the worst to have come to Old Trafford so far.

But then came Sunderland.

Now I’m not naive enough to expect teams to come to Old Trafford and play in a gung-ho style that sees them receive a humiliating whipping. I of course understand the need to park the bus at times and if you can get in at 0-0 for half time, then maybe you can live a bit more dangerously in the second half, have the audacity to get a point or three at Old Trafford.

However, it has been some time since a team has come to Manchester and played the way Sunderland did last weekend. With half an hour played I turned to my dad and asked him just how long Sunderland could keep playing like this. United were planted in our opponent’s half of the pitch and every time a shot was blocked or Sunderland managed to regain possession, they booted it back up the field to Rio Ferdinand, Nemanja Vidic, or sometimes, Edwin Van der Sar.

It turned out they could keep that up for a long time, 90 minutes in fact, but justice was done when United scored as injury time was being announced.

When I watched the highlights on Match of the Day, Alan YSB Hansen said that it was a shame for Sunderland who had played ‘brilliantly’ for 90 minutes. Brilliant? What I consider to be a brilliant performance seems to differ wildly from Hansen’s approach.

A brilliant display, for me, is one that is composed at the back, quickly shutting out any threats, whilst eager to press forward and win the game. One touch passes, fancy footwork, long range yet inch perfect balls, pace and agility in attack, varying methods of breaking down the opposition, and that’s just for starters.

How Sunderland played at Old Trafford was far from brilliant. Whilst quick to boot the ball out of play or up the field, the Mackems had very little to offer in terms of attacking football, in fact, they had nothing. They didn’t create single chance, on or off target, in 90 minutes. Yet Hansen is hailing this as ‘brilliant’, so I can only imagine how he would have eulogised over their performance had they actually left with a point.

I imagine if you asked United fans about Hull City you’d get a very positive response. With one game left at home in 2009, Hull are the only side this season who have come at us. The downside of that was at one point, they were losing 4-1, whilst the positive is they left the ground after losing 4-3, the first team since Chelsea in 2005 to score three goals against us at Old Trafford.

They had 46% possession, 6 shots on target, 4 off, compared to our 9 on and 9 off. As injury time was announced, it was United fans blowing their whistles, urging the referee to do the same. Arsenal had just squandered a substantial lead against Spurs in the week to draw 4-4, which was obviously in the minds of most, but Hull had posed a genuine threat and a penalty eight minutes from time blew the match wide open.

As we were clinging on for all three points, obviously I was wishing the time away, but on the walk back we were all buzzing. It had been a bloody good game of football, a load of goals and our lads had really had to work for it. It’s not often we have to score four goals to ensure a win and I take my hat off to teams that make us play that way. They showed no fear and that made for a great match.

With managers’ jobs on the line a few months in a post, the money dished out for every league position, the cash lost if relegated, it makes sense that teams are very precious over points. I understand why teams come to Old Trafford and park the bus, but christ, it isn’t half getting boring.

My question is, should teams be praised for playing football in this way though? Had Sunderland got a point, should it have been something celebrated by neutrals (for reasons other than the fact Manchester United had dropped two points at home!)? Whilst I can see that getting a point at Old Trafford is an achievement for a team in Sunderland’s predicament, I just can’t get my head around the idea that such negative football, anti-football if you like, deserves to be anything other than criticised.

Djibril Cisse is in the top ten scorers in the Premiership this season, yet didn’t get a sniff of goal. How can that be deemed a positive thing? How can a team seeing just 28% of the ball and not create a single chance in 90 minutes be regarded as anything other than totally shit, regardless of the opposition.

“I thought Sunderland’s attitude to the game was appalling,” said Gary Neville. “It is difficult for teams to come to Old Trafford and you don’t expect them to roll over. You do expect them to come out and play football and they got what they deserved, I felt. And we got what we deserved, which was to win the game and keep our momentum going.”

Nemanja Vidic’s injury time goal served a purpose. Yes, it gave us our three points, but it also ensured that negative football would not be rewarded. Hopefully more teams travelling to Old Trafford, and anywhere else for that matter, follow the example set by the likes of Hull rather than that of Sunderland, for the sake of football in this country.

Scott runs the popular Manchester United blog, Republik of Mancunia.

Comments (9)

  1. Great article i’m still suprised Hansons got a job he chats so much bs its unreal top article good read

  2. Great article… but:

    Am I to suppose that your reaction to the Barcelona – Man Utd game last season was the same? Because Manchester United ‘did a Sunderland’ last season when the played at Camp Nou and I am pretty sure that I was the ONLY unhappy United supporter.

    I am not trying to put you down – this really is a great article – all I am trying to do is show that we are extremely hypocritical when it comes to our favourite football.

    I made the mistake of claiming, on a United forum (was writing for RedRants at the time), that I wished Barcelona scored a late winner. Wanna know what reaction that got? Or can you guess (no prizes :P )?

    So now that we claim that justice was served against Sunderlan, through Vida’s late winner, can we say that justice was not served at Camp Nou last April?

    Just for emphasis, I agree with your stance in this article completely.

  3. I don’t agree with negative football. However some teams have been able to scramble points or even a win with this style. When you are always fighting for survival in the premier legue, you do what you have to do in order to survive. Good post.

    By : http://idoitforfootball.wordpress.com/

  4. I totally agree. I love the way Hull have approached their games against the big four and I really wish more clubs would recognize that setting out to press and harry the likes or Arsenal and Man U can set you up to turn them over.

    And I’m an Arsenal man.

  5. @Andrei, can’t agree. Utd went to to Barcelona with a game plan to play them on the break, missed an early penalty and had a good shout for 2 others. While the stats may not look pretty, Barca hardly had a clear cut chance in the game and never came close to breaking the Utd defence down. It was a tactically supreme execution of a game plan and the big difference here is that it was a 2 legged tie. This for me justifies the approach as opposed to a one off game.

    Otherwise, I agree totally with TC.

  6. Andrei – I hear what you’re saying, but I don’t think our performance against Barcelona is comparable to how the majority of teams play at Old Trafford.

    Firstly, statistically speaking, we had 7 shots in that game (granted, only 1 on target).

    Secondly, our best two chances came when Ronaldo burst in to the box. On both occasions he was illegally brought down and we were awarded a penalty for one of them. The likes of Sunderland never broke in to our box.

    Thirdly, United’s game plan was to play counter-attacking football. We’d absorb pressure (which we did remarkably well, when you consider the likes of Messi, Eto’o, Henry etc. only had 6 shots on target at home) then push forward to create our own opportunities to score. That is not the same as winning back possession and hoofing the ball up the pitch every single time, as Sunderland did.

    I agree, we played extremely defensively at the Nou Camp, but it wasn’t as if there was NO substance to our performance. On a different night, it could have been 2-0 to United had we been awarded both penalties and Ronaldo actually scored them. Only in an alternate universe could Sunderland have won 2-0 at Old Trafford with the way they played.

  7. I think football is starting to go that way now!!

  8. Fair point, Scott.

    On a different night at Camp Nou, it could have been 2-0 to Barcelona and on a different afternoon at Old Trafford, Sunderland would have lost n-0. Still, I found the two performances relatively comparable (accounting for the immense discrepancy in class and skill between the two teams). I realize United did not go to Camp Nou with the same game plan as Sunderland came to us (we can only guess what would have happened then) but they did go in content to snatch a draw and that is exactly what Sunderland did…

  9. I don’t think United ever approach any game aiming for a draw. We ran out at the Nou Camp not wanting to concede, to make the second leg as easy as possible for us. We didn’t go there hoping for a draw.