Misunderstood: A Response to “Landon Donovan’s Hypocrisy”

Misunderstood: A Response to “Landon Donovan’s Hypocrisy”

After reading my Soccerlens colleague’s article, “Landon Donovan’s Hypocrisy,” I felt compelled to respond in greater length than a simple comment allows.  The article recounts Donovan’s criticism of David Beckham in July 2009 and continues to accuse him of hypocrisy.  Of course, for this accusation to stick, Donovan would have to “feign to be what he is not or believe what he does not” (according to the Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary definition).

As a preface, I want to clarify that I intend to argue only that Donovan is not a hypocrite.  None of my argument pertains to the relative quality and talent of both players.  Beckham has had a storied career and he continues to show longevity and endeavor.  Thus, I turn to my response.

Apples and Oranges, Sir.

I understand that a Beckham apologist would take offense to Donovan’s behavior.  The American was vocal in his criticism in July 2009, as was noted at the beginning of the article.

“My sense is that David is clearly frustrated, that he’s unhappy and, honestly, that he thinks it’s a joke. I also kind of feel that he’s taking the team for granted. I don’t see dedication or commitment to this team, and that’s troubling”.

The alleged hypocrisy occurred in December 2009 when we learned Donovan would be loaned to Everton for ten weeks beginning in January.  Donovan was, in my colleague’s words, “doing exactly the same thing he criticized Beckham for doing seven months ago.”

For the rest of us who aren’t as reactionary or near-sighted, we know that Donovan was not mimicking his on-again-off-again teammate.  Why?

First, recall that Beckham arrived in Los Angeles in July 2007.  There was considerable fanfare – not only because the global icon was going to play in MLS, but because he openly declared his desire to see the sport grow in the U.S.  This was evidenced by a contract provision for future ownership in a MLS franchise, as well as his own words.

“I’m coming there not to be a superstar. I’m coming there to be part of the team, to work hard and to hopefully win things.”

You see, Beckham made it sound like he wanted to be in the U.S.  After the 2008 season, he was loaned to AC Milan – initially planned for January through March of 2009.  Why only until March?  So that he could return to Los Angeles for the start of the 2009 MLS season.  But Becks did not return in March.  Instead, he extended his loan until July and thereby missed half of the MLS season.

Almost immediately upon his return, Beckham made it clear that he wanted to play for England in 2010.  This implied another move abroad.  In other words, after missing half a season on loan to AC Milan, he returned to the U.S. saying he would likely go abroad again – all while his teammates were actively engaged in the year’s campaign.

Donovan might have lacked discretion in his criticism, but it isn’t difficult to understand his frustration.  Beckham had been handed the keys to the city, the captain’s armband, and a blank check, but he seemed to be taking it all for granted.  In order to “be a part of the team” and “hopefully win things,” one cannot put himself before the team.

Similarly, one cannot blame Becks for wanting to play in one more World Cup.  The problem is not what he wanted, but how he went about his business.

Why Donovan’s Story Differs

First, when Donovan criticized Beckham in July 2009, he had spent more than eight seasons in MLS and four with the Galaxy.  He had already given much to the league and his team.  Conversely, Beckham arrived and has been abroad or talking about going abroad for the majority of his brief tenure in MLS.

Second, Donovan went to Bayern Munich on loan in 2009, but returned for the start of the MLS season.  Conversely, Beckham went to AC Milan and missed half the season.

Third, Donovan may be the most famous American soccer player, but he has never let his celebrity interfere with his team’s performance.  Conversely, despite Beckham’s undisputable work ethic and talent, he is all about celebrity.  Perhaps his public relations and management team deserves some blame for poor handling of his affairs, but Becks deserves the lion’s share.

Fourth, Donovan’s salary is one of the higher ones in MLS (roughly $900,000 per year), but he is not a “designated player” like Beckham.  The designated player rule is strange, I admit, but it exists and should be considered in this context.  The Galaxy used its designated player slot on Beckham.  Even though his wages would be paid by AC Milan (or whichever team employed him on loan), the Galaxy would be unable to fill the slot so long as his contract was owned by the Galaxy/MLS.  In other words, if Donovan were to stay at Everton, the Galaxy would have more freedom to replace him than they do when Beckham leaves for an extended period.  Beckham knows this, yet he has abused the goodwill that MLS, the Galaxy, American media, and fans have demonstrated since July 2007.

Too Soon For Hypocrisy

In order for Donovan to truly be a hypocrite, the facts would have to be otherwise.  For example, let’s say Donovan publicly announces he wants to stay at Everton through May.  He would miss two months of the MLS season.  Then, after the World Cup, let’s say he returns to Los Angeles, but reveals he wants to return to Everton or some other European club.  Maybe a club makes a move and maybe they wait until January, once again, when Donovan is signed on loan.  At that point, Donovan’s situation would start to look more like Beckham’s – it would start to look like hypocrisy.

Donovan is not above criticism.  Far from it.  He has been castigated by the American and European press at various points in his career.  His failure in the Bundesliga warranted criticism.  His immaturity and lack of commitment plagued him for a number of years.  More recently, he has been mocked for his wrist-kissing ritual before taking penalties.

The point of this discussion, however, is not that Donovan is perfect, or that he is a better player than Beckham.  The point is that he has not yet become a hypocrite.

Topics: English Premier League, Features, MLS

Email This Post Email This Post

Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

  1. Observer

    No..if not a hypocrite already, he is or will be one AS SOON AS he started saying that he wants to stay at Everton THROUGH May. After all..his loan now if up until MARCH only, NOT MAY. And those in America only started got mad at Beckham a year ago NOT because he went on loan to Ac Milan, but because he stayed there up until May instead of the initial 3 months.

    07/02/2010, 07:25
  2. Ben

    Erratum: Landon Donovan IS a designated player. He is essentially “grandfathered” into that status, allowing LA to carry two DPs at the same time.

    07/02/2010, 09:39
  3. Nicole

    You people are missing the entire premise which would make this all a non-issue: Donovan DID NOT criticize Beckham for going on loan! In fact, he said he completely understood why Becks went to Milan and understood why he wanted to stay further.

    Donovan’s criticism of Becks was for his seeming lack of commitment and mailing it in after Ruud Gullit quit in the 2008 season. In other words, the criticism was his play WHILE WITH THE GALAXY.

    That’s what the fans were all mad about too: Beckham wasn’t even trying that season after Gullit left and then he goes on over to Milan and he’s a great player. You could see the difference in his play and his demeanor.

    Thus Donovan is not and cannot be a hypocrit in this situation because LD played his heart out for the Galaxy and is playing his heart out for Everton.

    07/02/2010, 15:45
  4. jdm

    Nicole is 100% correct, but I guess the “haters” will always find something to pin on Donovan. It’s all a non-issue let’s just move on.

    07/02/2010, 20:15
  5. Sergio Alvarez

    Just like your collegue do your research on the comments donovan made. Those comments had nothing to do with Beckham loan to Milan. Comments came out in july 2009 from book that was being writing during the 2008 season. Thats were I dont see how you can label Donovan a hypocrite when he never made a comment towards Beckham loan.

    07/02/2010, 20:31
  6. Corey Bennett

    True, the comments were made in October 2008, but Donovan’s initial silence on the matter kept the controversy ripe. As I have argued, Beckham’s failure to return for the beginning of the 2009 season bolstered Donovan’s argument. Thus, the comments in Grant Wahl’s book were even more relevant when they were revealed all those months later.

    Good points everyone.

    07/02/2010, 21:29
  7. Erik

    For what its worth. I don’t care if Beckham comes back to the states. In MLS he’s been more hype than substance. And for that matter, I hope Donovan stays in Europe. I think it would be better for the US National team.

    07/02/2010, 23:24
  8. Jan

    Please do not defend Donovan. He was practically unheard of oveseas and here in Australia, if it were not for Beckham. And yes, he IS a hypocrite in my eyes.

    As for LA Galaxy, they were also no-entities until Beckham joined them.

    So, puh-leeze, Donovan and LA Galaxy totally benefitted from the publicity that Beckham generated and which Donovan never acknowledged!! At least Galaxy was more grateful.
    Jan

    08/02/2010, 03:06
  9. Lil' Zeke

    Sorry, nobody’s 100% correct in this. Surprising your team by failing to show up until the middle of the season is hypocrisy, no matter who does it. Good observations Corey.

    08/02/2010, 03:13
  10. Dick

    @lil’ zeke – No, hipocrisy is claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one’s own own behavior does not conform.

    And Nicole is actually 100% correct.

    09/02/2010, 04:21
  11. Bill James

    nah. Looking at the intial statement made out beckham to be un-loyal by going out on the loan. Donovan goes out and does the same thing, and therefore is a hypocrit. Simple.

    No need to go so deep into it. Thats the fact plain and simple.

    09/02/2010, 17:21
  12. steven

    i just watched the chelsea and everton game and after that there is no way donovan will want to go back and play in the mls

    11/02/2010, 02:12

Partners

11 Kicks Football Media Fox Networks Hi Media Microsoft YardBarker
Content SoccerLens
Soccerlens offers a free weekly newsletter with: Soccerlens is read by over 1,000,000 readers each month - come join the community!