Maradona vs. Pele: the Hand of God vs. the Right Hand of God
Tonight, Diego Maradona makes his bow as Argentina manager as his new charges take on Scotland at Hampden Park. This momentous occasion gives us a wonderful chance to tackle one of football’s greatest debates, to wit: Who is the greatest footballer of all time – Maradona or Pelé? Since I’ve already definitively dealt with the club versus country question, I’ve decided to have a go at this one too.
So here goes: the answer is “Pelé”. Duh.
However, I realise that, even though the answer is obvious to all but those so slack-jawed that were the rivulets of saliva which trickle from their mouths to converge, the resulting torrent would wipe out a small-to-medium port town on the Chinese coast, it is the custom to back up such an assertion with some evidence. Frankly, one could write volumes on this matter, but I shall pare down my argument (if you could call such an evidently open-and-shut case as this an “argument”) to a few paragraphs.
The litany of Maradona’s egregiousness is startling: the diving, the failed dope test at the 1994 World Cup, the cocaine addiction, the sheer greed which saw him eat his way through the entire 1990s, etc., et-bloody-cetera. But top of the list is what the man himself outrageously referred to as the “Hand of God”, when he punched the ball past England ‘keeper Peter Shilton and into the net in the 1986 World Cup quarter-final. Plenty has been said about this in the two-and-a-bit decades since. Suffice to add, when you consider that the English gave the great game of footie to the nation of the ungrateful little arseboil, and that England is, was and ever shall be synonymous with Fair Play, is it any wonder England fans bear a grudge?
The “H*nd of God” could be entered not just as Exhibit A in the case against Maradona, but as Exhibit every-other-letter-of-the-alphabet, so heinous was it. But let’s apply some rigour to this. Let’s look at the things for which he is most famous. On the one hand, there is his second goal against England, which – to be fair – was very good. On the other, there is the “H*nd of G*d”, the Crazy-Eyes-Killa routine at USA ’94, the cocaine, the morbid obesity and the massive heart attack. In summary, that’s one positive and five negatives, which makes a Class Rating of -4. That’s not my opinion – that’s Statistics.
Some may complain that it is unfair to hold someone up to an impossible moral standard just because they are gifted. To which I reply: no-one made Maradona play football. If he didn’t want the scrutiny, he should have become a shoeshine boy or a drug dealer like his squalid friends doubtless did.
Pelé had no problem dealing with the burden of talent. In fact, he thrived. Here was a footballer who was a genuine joy to behold. He gladdened the heart of everyone who saw him, whether scoring a goal, fooling a defender with a shimmy or just standing there being Pelé. He never cheated and was probably never sent off. It’s no co-incidence that the words “Pelé” and “perfection” both begin with the same two letters.
His style of play was infused with beauty. It was akin to an angelic orgy, with God having sex with Himself in the corner.
Even in the 1962 World Cup, when Pelé was injured in the group phase, his mere presence in Chile was enough to inspire Brazil to ultimate triumph. Put it this way: whoever remembers the name of any other player in that Brazil squad? Exactly.
And even when telling us that there are ways for all of us to make our winkies hard in a message sponsored by a corporation which manufactures pills to make your winkie hard, he did it with grace and elegance.
Pelé and Maradona are emblems for their respective football cultures, which dominate the South American game. Brazilian football is played to a samba beat, their players having learned to play on the beaches of Copacabana and Ipanema. The national league is home to free-flowing attacking football, where even the defenders are better footballers than the most skillful players in most countries. There is a flair and a sway to games in Brazil which is irresistible to the hundreds of thousands of ecstatic fans in the Maracaná. As a bonus, the goalkeepers are universally awful, which ensures non-stop goal action in almost every match.
Argentine football is Brazil’s stunted twin brother. The national team’s greatest successes have come through nefarious means. In 1978, Peru’s goalkeeper – an Argentine! – practically stood back and waved in six goals as Argentina scandalously reached the final. In 1986, of course, poor England suffered at the hands – or should that be hand – of Maradona. When things go against them, they do little but whinge. When Antonio RattÃn was sent off against England in 1966, he petulantly refused to leave. Not accepting the decision of a referee is a sure sign of an inherent lack of morality. In what other country would it be done with such intensity?
Maradona’s warped ideas have even been passed on to the next generation of Argentinian players like a defective gene. Lionel Messi irredeemably marked himself out as a footballing lowlife when he re-enacted the “H**d of **d” for Barcelona. (Don’t you think players who do this should have to wear a bell around their neck or have their forehead tattooed with a “H” or something?)
The most pithy way I can think of to describe the difference between Maradona and Pelé, and their respective countries, is to present their contributions to the footballing lexicon. Maradona gave us “H*** ** **d”, which is a byword for corruption, egotism and greed. Pelé gave us “The Beautiful Game”, glorious shorthand for our wonderful sport – the sport which Maradona took and dragged through the filth.
In closing, let us bring up the great Terry Butcher. Butcher is now Scotland’s assistant manager, but was a key part of the England team which was deprived of the 1986 World Cup by…you know what. Here is what he said this week:
I was selected for the drugs test with Gary Stevens and Kenny Sansom and ended up in the room with Maradona and two of his pals. Our World Cup was over and they were celebrating.
It could have been a war-zone in there but it wasn’t. I wasn’t next to him, if I was I might have done something.
Butcher would have been quite entitled to physically display his displeasure, but instead showed the admirable restraint which made him a true hero. One thing’s for sure: if God is up there picking His all-time World XI, Butcher and Pelé would be the first names on the team-sheet. Maradona wouldn’t even be trusted with the water bottles.
Fredorrarci is Chief Guard of the Ark of the Covenant, a/k/a Sport Is A TV Show.
Also See: Maradona v Pele – Who Was Better?
Topics: Argentina, Brazil, Diego Maradona, Managers



Football News 24/7
Why is Maradona badmouthed everywhere because of one foolish action? This is also the man who would absolutely dick any team he came up against. He had skill, class and everything to make him world class but ohh no because this is the man who performed the ‘Hand of God’ he doesn’t deserve recognition. yes that makes sense…
November 19th, 2008 @ 08:28I find it really funny that the biggest names in football in there day end up either selling penis problems or they double there body mass on a class A drug!!
November 19th, 2008 @ 10:51Firstly, would everyone commenting please decarle their age? Most people on here will remember Maradonna (or maybe not) but not have seen Pele in his hay day. I did, and he was unquestionably the better player.
I also agree wholeheartedly with the assessment of Maradonna as a low life scum bag.
To hotspurownarsenal: “Why is Maradona badmouthed everywhere because of one foolish action?”
Did you read the article? I am not English and have no axe to grind about the HOG incident. Its about being busted for drug taking during at a World Cup. Being busted for addiction to coke while playing for Napoli. Shooting at journalists outside his house. Making a drunk and drug infested idiot of himself countless times in front of the cameras and, in short, bringing as much disgrace on Argentina as he did glory.
He’s a sad excuse for a human being and deserves no publicity as a celebrity. Call this guy a role model?
As they say, you can take the man out of the gutter but you can’t take the gutter out of the man.
Well said Fred.
November 19th, 2008 @ 11:48maradona is the greatest player ever since he always played for weak teams. the squad of 1986 which won the world cup was an average one, it had no star players except maradona. on the other hand, pele always played for strong teams, the squad of 1970 victory was voted the strongest ever. maradona single-handedly brought argentina the cup, anything like this cant be said of pele.
November 19th, 2008 @ 11:48ajaypal singh: In a word: Bollocks!
November 19th, 2008 @ 11:55Fredo, I think we can safely say you were warned the last time about the lack of humour in some of our readers
November 19th, 2008 @ 11:56This post made me so mad, I could punch a ball into a net!
November 19th, 2008 @ 12:51One of the most biased and judgemental articles I’ve ever read. You talk about who the greatest player of all time is, but I see little mention of footballing ability in your article. Very poorly written. Ahmed, I’m surprised you even allowed this article to be put up. Not really consistent with the standards of journalistic integrity Soccerlens is known for, mate.
November 19th, 2008 @ 15:10That’s pure BS. Pele was a guy who had it easy from the start, and while playing, if he hadn’t been playing with Garrincha behind him he wouldn’t be the star we all think he is. Maradona was a guy who lived since he was born in one of the worst places to live in Argentina, and once he was a star he only draged his old gosts with him, while being sorrounded that people who only told him that if he kept making money he could do anything he wanted. Having no real education, he didn’t know better. The drugs problem gave him obesity after he left drugs, and now, motly because of the Showball, he has cleaned his act. Plus his play was way superior than Pele’s, as it was Di Stefano’s and Garrincha’s IMO. To be honest I don’t like the guy, he’s a mess, although he’s geting his act together now he’s a manager, but this article is pure BS.
November 19th, 2008 @ 16:04you also forgot to mention maradona’s insidious plot to breed future generations of maradonas by marrying his daughter to sergio aguero. we cannot allow further generations of this handballing degenerate to infiltrate pele’s beautiful game.
November 19th, 2008 @ 17:02That pic is almost 10 years old, he’s now in a relatively good shape. At least he did overcame his problems, abusing someone for their past problems is much worse than the hand of god, something that happened 30 years ago, and that you seem to be unable to forget.
November 19th, 2008 @ 18:11Typical bitter anti-Maradona rant, with little emphasis of what he did on the pitch. As someone else noted, Pele’s Brazil teams were absolutely stacked. In fact they won the World Cup without him in 1962 – he was injured in the first game.
Pele is easily the better goal-scorer striker, but Maradona was a more complete player who could single-handedly change the performance of the entire offense. That’s how he took a mediocre Argentina side to the WC final and took tiny Napoli to two Italian championships and the UEFA cup. But if you think all of that gets wiped out by the “hand of God”, I’d say you’re extremely petty, not to mention delusional if you think England were better in that match.
November 19th, 2008 @ 18:24I’m off to find a wall…
November 19th, 2008 @ 18:43Heh heh. Ahhh the eternal argument that never goes away. This topic comes up every now & then in cycles & we’re all predictably sucked into it. I disagree with the conclusion anyway. And to back it up i’ll post a link to something i wrote on the forum many many many moons ago (just to show we were having this argument waaaay back then too) –
http://soccerlens.com/forum/topic/maradona-vs-pele-who-was-the-most-complete-player
November 19th, 2008 @ 19:04Why don’t you speak about the Hurst’s goal In 1966 World Cup Final? Why don’t you speak about all the alcohol problems of A LOT of the best players of England history?
I Hate the Human being named Diego Armando Maradona. He is full of shit, dumb, idiot and shellfish. But neither me, you, or anybody in this fucking big planet can say that Maradona isn’t the BEST player of all times. his unique technique, his peed, his GUTS!!!! He played the entirely 1990 world cup with his ankle almost broken!!! Do you think that Pele would do that? He wouldn’t, because he loves the money, not the football nor the country he “represents”
Also, you can talk about the most famous quote from Maradona: “La pelota no se mancha” (The football doesn’t get dirty), talking about why his infinite list of mistakes in his private life, won’t darken his football carreer.
The last thing I’ll say is: If Charlton or Pele were born in Villa Fiorito like Diego, they, probably would dedicate their entire life to rob people or sell drugs. I can bet all my guitars, my house and my job in that afirmation.
Waffle, a proud 21 years old Argentinian.
(Like ever, forgive me if I had some typos and gramatical mistakes)
November 19th, 2008 @ 19:10What is Terry Butcher complaining about, considering he scored the second goal?
November 19th, 2008 @ 19:29Ahmed, one day they will all recognise my genius…
November 19th, 2008 @ 20:26The never-ending “who’s better, Maradona or Pele?” debate. The eternal comparison of apples and oranges. And as far as east is from west, those who have a pre-disposition in hating Maradona will always say that Pele is better (and then offer a symposium on why) and vice-versa. Maybe if Maradona actually succeeds in managing and (not a prediction) wins the World Cup, we might be able to differentiate the two by this achievement alone… but I doubt it. Why do we engage in this endless debate? Probably because there is never going to be a clear answer and it is the argument itself that entertains us. Certainly anyone who believes for a second that they can convince another who disagrees is engaging in wishful thinking.
November 20th, 2008 @ 00:04Obviously, the majority of the people commenting have never been in an English class. Great article.
November 20th, 2008 @ 01:40Stupid debate, even more stupid article. I thought this was a comparison, instead, it seems like a smear-campaign for the one, and a Nobel prize giving award biography for the other, with almost no mention of performances on the pitch.
Both players are equally great. To different people, due to differing experiences the one will always be held in higher esteem than the other. I have not seen Pele play, but I have seen Maradonna, therefore, it is pretty obvious who my choice is. In saying that, I cannot argue that the other was less (or more).
I just find it funny that all Maradonna’s negatives are issues ‘off the pitch’. Who are we to criticise?
November 20th, 2008 @ 06:58It’s like saying Micheal Jackson was a shit artist (never mind the fact that he out-sold Elvis)
@Fredo – I’ve been saying that for ages, I hope you have better luck.
November 20th, 2008 @ 08:09Fredo, Fredo, Fredo. You poor deluded soul.
The answer to the question, “Who was the greatest footballer of all time?” is, as enu fule kno, Stan Bowles. With Puskas in second place.
Can we all shut up about the fat Argentinian cheat now?
November 20th, 2008 @ 09:42Well i think it is good for everyone to express their views. Pls, let all acknowledge that everybody may have their own pitfalls but excel in one area or the other. I may not like him for one reason or the other BUT at least Diego did something for world football.
November 20th, 2008 @ 16:02Curiously, this is the same website that argued about morality vs. results last year, when it was Kaka vs. Ronaldo for the Ballon D’Or. Back then, the official quote from Ahmed was,
“It’s unfair that one should judge players based on anything other than results and performances, especially when the award is supposed to determine the best player on the pitch.”
So, Ahmed, what was your opinion on Fredo’s article again? Or does your anti-establishment outrage only apply when a Manchester United player is involved?
November 20th, 2008 @ 17:04“practically stood back and waved in six goals.”
November 20th, 2008 @ 18:21nice touch. along with the image you have selected of Maradona.
Do you write for sun too?
Well, let me start by saying that I do recognize your genius. But your article sucks.
To the point, of course there’s no use comparing them, different styles, different eras and so on. They were both great. But if one of them is to be picked, it would be Pele. For the reasons you give, and because after all he did win the Cup 3 times.
That said, I’m looking forward to your article when Pele is appointed Brazil manager.
November 20th, 2008 @ 19:06When Pelé becomes manager, Evil will triumph over Good and the world will end because God won’t be able to stop having sex with himself…
November 20th, 2008 @ 19:14TBH, this is the one bit I didn’t quite like about your piece, this God/sex thing. But maybe it’s just me.
November 20th, 2008 @ 19:17And, of course, you are being too harsh on M., even for a funny piece. “Pelé gave us “The Beautiful Gameâ€, glorious shorthand for our wonderful sport – the sport which Maradona took and dragged through the filth.” really, I don’t think he deserves this.
November 20th, 2008 @ 19:24Frankly, I thought the God/sex thing is the pinnacle of my achievement in life thus far, but there you go. Horses for courses, isn’t it?
November 20th, 2008 @ 19:27A matter of taste.
I forgot the most important thing I had to say: had there been a video ref in place back then, the Hand of God would never have happened.
And a consistent amount of english literature would have gone down the drain.
November 20th, 2008 @ 19:32Re. your comment #29, FF – maybe so, but I assure you it was purely for effect. Put it this way – if Argentina and Maradona win the World Cup in 2010, it may become my favourite non-partisan football moment, ahead of Spain winning the Euros.
November 20th, 2008 @ 22:34teams like argentina and italy get little respect somehow, and its all universal. strange?
what diego did with his personal life whether its drugs, women or arrogance, he is to be remembered for his football. he may not be the greatest footballer of all time, but he is still worthy of talking about with pride when itcomes to football.
he did good things with napoli. as for pele, who the hell is he?? the guy NEVER played in europe, he is just a player with a good eye for goal, how many brazilians have we seen with good goal-scoring qualities. if there’s a star brazilian to talk about, its kaka. even fabiano is a better player than pele, diego is far from comparison.
so stop being foolish, and judge the man for his game. he is BETTER than pele and most brazilian players anytime. just watch pele’s game, and only a fool listens to journalists who NEVER play the game.
November 21st, 2008 @ 07:15@Sandro: “as for pele, who the hell is he??”
You ignorant little pratt. You wern’t even thought-up by your parents when Pele was playing and never saw anything other than a few clips of some of his goals yet you know all about him?
He scored all those goals, by the way, while not playing as a striker.
Learn about what you’re commenting on before coming on here and wasting people’s time with your drivel.
November 21st, 2008 @ 07:32@Yukona: My position is the same, morality should not enter the debate. However, you seem to have missed the point of the article – it’s a (maybe too subtle) jab at the false morality the English press preach when talking about Pele and Maradona, an exaggeration, etc etc.
Unless Fredo really meant it. Now that would be truly amusing
@Fredo: I thought God was into Scarlett Johansson or some other little number? Was Pele *really* that good?
November 21st, 2008 @ 08:54I afraid Fred is way to subtle for me if this was the intention! Anyway, what a reaction!
For all the post Pele spotty faced Maradonna fans why not educate youself by watchiing the following:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2u9r0_pele-best-soccer-player-ever-pele_sport
November 21st, 2008 @ 09:45ibrahim sana: Watch the video link I posted and accept that just because it wasn’t in your lifetime doesn’t detract from its genius!
Watch the video and tell me that Pele wasn’t a dribbler! Watch the video and tell me that Pele was only good because he had good players around him!
As for Maradona single handedly winning a World Cup. If you’d ever played football at any level or understood the game you’d understand that that is not actually possible.
November 21st, 2008 @ 13:35i think the one who wrote this article is not comparing the two players but rather criticizing one.i think is from england so he hates maradona and also jealous of him that is why he is accusing maradona instead oc comparing what they did on the pitch.let me also tell u this is not about thier life style,this is what they did in football.and also comparing the two maradona was dribler he single handedly won the world cup but with pele when he was around he was not brazil’s best player because they had very good players like him could play like him and also who could score like him.ask your self they say pele scored more goals than every player how many goals has he scored in the world cup?
November 21st, 2008 @ 12:43@BD that’s a nice compilation, but you can find just as many (more actually) about Maradona. It’s impossible to compare the two because they never played against each other or in the same era. Without Maradona, Argentina doesn’t win a second world cup, in all likelihood. Without Pele, Brazil maybe wins the same amount. Garrincha was every bit as good as Pele, from what I have seen. Just not as charismatic or pretty, and he liked the booze. That’s why I use a top three instead of the best one, since it’s impossible to tell who really is the greatest of all time. For the record, my top three includes one Argentine, two Brazilians, and one Hungarian.
November 21st, 2008 @ 18:09@Ahmed
I have it on good authority that God is a Monica Bellucci man…
November 22nd, 2008 @ 01:43‘Garrincha was every bit as good as Pele, from what I have seen. Just not as charismatic or pretty, and he liked the booze’
January 9th, 2009 @ 20:27Garrincha was a specialist ‘dribbler’- perhaps the greatest in that discipline. Pele had an all round game, he could do the difficult things and the simple equally well. He would probably have been outstanding in any outfield position. Pele was also brilliant at doing something Maradona was reluctant to do, namely passing the ball to his team mates. Bearing in mind how selfish Maradona was it’s actually surptising he didn’t score more goals.
This is the most biased article i’ve ever read,
haha. But you said that the scored +1200 goals, remember that the usual lineup on those times was a 3-2-5 and a usual match could finish 4-0. In Brasil there is a cup wich name i ignore that is similar to the FA but, with ALL the teams from division 4 to 1. So it was pretty easy to score, don’t you think?
March 21st, 2009 @ 02:03I can’t argue that Pele was a bad player, in fact, he’s in my Top 5
Must’ve been written by an English or Brazilian bloke who never played football himself,if you’d ask me..
Someone here said it right when he said that this isn’t an article about comparing two players,but to bash one of the two.(and the writer picked the wrong one,if you’d ask me.)
I feel sorry for the people who bash Maradona out of jealousy or whatever kind of reason..yep,Diego took drugs,yep he scored with his hand (and aparently it still hurts some people so much,that they are unable to remember the second goal in that match,or the rest of that tournament for that matter.) and probably did a lot more stupid things..Wasn’t Pele accused for child molesting once?ahh,of course that can never be true,the guy’s such a saint!!
Think about the time they both played football in and which players were surrounding them on the pitch at the time and you can only come up with one conlusion..
April 26th, 2009 @ 15:35The answer is:Maradona DUH!!
Re. comment #29 ..I saw the video but I prefer to look at 10,000 times the England goal by maradona at all which made the Brazilian in the video, really dull to all, thanks
August 5th, 2009 @ 02:20sorry the comment 36
August 5th, 2009 @ 02:22THE FINAL VERSION
April 18th, 2010 @ 07:23The pithy diabolic vulgar article that hangs loosely on the top of this debate as a obscene painting by a dissolute painter, perhaps marred the beautiful game of football more than the infamous Hand-of-God in an absolutely weird way and best describes the crooked, circuitous, ignoble vision of a fallen nation, that had a glorious past over the global social order, but now only harp on that glory of ‘those days are gone’, but yet cannot leave their filthy habit to take the world for granted as their colony, who would lick their boots. But, still it is not worthy enough, this malicious, explicitly vulgar and insane article (if you call it an article at all) by an equally insane, ego-centric, slack and crack-jawed blabbermouth and bleary eyed bah-humbug spewing venomous saliva, to make a genuine debate and quite justified argument a non-argument at all. Even it is not worthy to the rest of the world beyond the boundary of England, and also beyond Argentina for the record, where we live, to dig a microscopic hole on the layer of myth wafting stronger and stronger with the passage of years on that little 5’5’’ single footed, drug-addicted, bloated stomach Mozart of football. Immortality, perhaps, is the true word to describe the myth. However, to make real things silly and funny, getting inspiration from the nonsense non-article posted above, here are some points to ponder.
England is a great (self-declared) footballing nation with some great (only in England) footballers, who love to describe the footballers of other nation ‘animals’, which took off their masks of sobriety, suavity et cetera et-bloody-cetera and showed their culture and class verbatim, and sealed their only victory on the cup way back in 1966 (oh, give me the cup, give me the cup …cry baby) on their home turf with panache. Out of that solitary victory part, I would luv to highlight the Geoff Hurst goal, where the ball didn’t cross the goal line even, the Hand-of- God crossed at least… ahem, ahem. Well, both cases are actually Linesman’s fault, though both cases are serious offenses to boot showing the very lack of integrity of the players involved there, both cases to remind you all again. If Rattin had to finally abide by the decision by the Referee, I request those pent-up and petulant suckers for God’s sake to stop this nonsense and do accept it and abide by the decision which is, of course, not Maradona’s but the Referee’s here also. But, this is not my point. My real point is that I am really confounded and it’s been really amazing to me over the years that why the English people didn’t award Maradona a knight hood. I have seen them awarding a knight hood to a thief described before. Is it because that epoch making ‘No-goal’, which perhaps inspired Maradona to fool the linesman once again some 20years after, gave them their only victory and that ‘Hand-of-God’ actually kicked them on their butt plumb, showing them the door and threw out to their classy world of bigotry, mediocrity et cetera, et-definitely-cetera where they truly belong? The British people only actually think that the goal has thrown them out of the cup, but we, the rest of the world are sure of the fact, if England had scored that match level, Maradona, certainly, without a doubt, would have dribbled past Linekar, and that 10 other anonymous Brits (oh, I can’t remember the name of any British footballer, they are so mediocre historically) and scored a goal with his butt and then we would have got one famous Butt-of-God. Reason? We, who had seen that match live, know, Mardona wouldn’t have needed to do that infamous part, if that mediocre laborer Valdano had learnt to trap the ball properly and pass it in a decent manner. Instead, he whipped the ball high above, which was totally an eyesore, rest you know. But, count the countless number of chances, better you don’t try to count, those mediocre laborers squandered before that and count your teeth before making things silly. Well, England dominated the last fifteen minutes of this match, but any true sucker, who loves this beautiful game of football, must admit that Argentina never dominated a WC before and after, barring the few moments of this match and the final to boot to such an extent ‘cause of the single heavenly leg of the Mozart of football, unmatched before and after. It is truly His cup, not of some mediocre arseboils representing a nation whose hypocrisy, in every sphere of life, is both monumental and abysmal and their performance dismal. Rhyme it by rote. Reason? Let’s talk about some other sports. Cricket, you know? In the 70s era, it has become a familiar picture in the world of cricket of the English Batsmen dancing on the pitch and traipsing down to the leg side, whenever pitted against the invincible Caribbean fast bowlers and finally ending up by stamping on the feet of the leg umpire and getting themselves kicked on their butt plumb by him. They took the respite by simply banning more than one bouncer per over, that yields, they do not even hesitate to do dirty politics and change the rules of the game, if it does not help their mediocre skill level to survive. That killed the Caribbean cricket, which was like Brazilian football until then, the calypso and the samba. Gosh, luckily they don’t dominate in FIFA as much as they do in ICC. Otherwise, they would have given 22 footballs to 22 footballers on the ground of democracy to stop one 5’5” genius from holding the ball for most of the period of the match. After all, you are there to play with the ball first, but you did not get any chance to touch it even. That I think is the real reason behind their grudge on Mardona, which I find quite justified. Think of Terry Butchered …err …Butcher, who got butchered in that famous solo run for the goal of the century. Who would like that humiliation in front of some 80000 odd crowds, including the ladies? Think of Peter Simpleton …err… Schilton, who dived like a fish out of water and digested that goal like a simple gullible guy. You know, in ICC, what did they do? They award a much heavier punishment to the players of the sub continent, who are black in complexion, than the white ones for an equivalent offence. Fair play, sportsman spirit, my horse’s arse will be the last to be there to listen to it from them- the true arse-holes on this beautiful Earth. Coming back to the main topic, plenty of words said and plenty of newsprints have been consumed ‘cause the ill- fated 5’5” genius did it against a nation, who takes every full opportunity of English being the major international lingua-franca to make malicious falsified propaganda against any individual, any nation historically in any sphere of life that does not serve their very cause. On the other hand you see the Germans, they are much superior in every sphere- science and technology, western classical music, arts and football of course. But, have anyone of you seen them shouting so blatantly against the horrific act of the Thief of the 66 final. Yes, don’t forget that was the final, not a quarterfinal. Also, we see the culture comparison of Brazil and Argentina, best exhibit of which is the famous Battle of Burn of 1954 cup after the Brazil- Hungary match. Still, we can forgive them ‘cause they have given us the samba and the King, but can’t do exactly the same to a mediocre footballing but great political nation. Another reference to the so called British sobriety. They are the ones who add, every time during WC, since their unwanted entry to this greatest show on earth, a whole new dimension to the word hooliganism, popularly known as the British hooliganism. Is there any single world cup where we have not heard of either a German or a Chilean getting stabbed by the British goons? Send them- those green warty things, if possible the whole nation that they represent, to the Mars, so that, we, the ill-fated rest of the world may savor the show in peace. They are an eyesore- both on and off the pitch as a whole. So, you see, they are not even trusted as the mere spectators. Another notable observation, Maradona, Mozart and Magic, all these three start with a single letter ‘M’ that verbatim transpires magnificent. At last, a quote from one mediocre Terry Butcher. ‘It could have been a war-zone in there but it wasn’t. I wasn’t next to him, if I was I might have done something.’ So, it was not a question of restraint at all, he was not just too close to him. This shows the true animalistic greed, that vows not to abide by the referee. He was much more Antonio Rattin, or better said, Rattin was less Terry Butcher. And Butcher, if the WC finished there for u, let it be so ‘cause the world was not there to see you and your people’s mediocrity. And, officially, for the record, if England had won that match by any miracle, then they would have to beat Eric Garrets and Enzo Schiffo’s ever best Belgium squad. Had they passed that definitely by hook or by any crook, then they would have to beard the lion, Kerl Heinz Rumenige’s West Germany. Then that would have been a third time championship title for the Germans easily, they wouldn’t have needed to wait for another four more years. So, England is deprived of the cup, my foot. Another quote: ‘Some may complain that it is unfair to hold someone up to an impossible moral standard just because they are gifted. To which I reply: no-one made Maradona play football. If he didn’t want the scrutiny, he should have become a shoeshine boy or a drug dealer like his squalid friends doubtless did.’ To this I reply: if Maradona had not played football, the world would have missed something of the height of Mona Lisa or Serenade, but if England had not played football and a myopic dunce had not written this obscene non-article perched precariously on the top, we would have got a much more beautiful game of football and breathed in a much less polluted world.
A suggestion to the non-writer of the non-article: Also get the English spectators, the footballers to boot as they do bear the same filthy gene, tattooed on their forehead by ‘H’ in the upcoming world cup. Here ‘H’ stands for hooligans.
Ahmed, please don’t moderate this edited and final version out.
Quote: Argentine football is Brazil’s stunted twin brother. The national team’s greatest successes have come through nefarious means. In 1978, Peru’s goalkeeper – an Argentine! – practically stood back and waved in six goals as Argentina scandalously reached the final. Nice touch. The chuckle headed writer explored the point with a video as nicely as any true sucker would do. Well, now let’s explore the case of 66 WC in a equally elaborate fashion. England’s national team’s only solitary victory of this cup came through mischievous, dubious, nefarious means, but never discussed by the human race much, as this is naturally expected from a nation of pirates who thrive on fraudulence and forgery in every sphere of life. Reason? In 66, we have seen both the King and the mighty Italians practically had to stand back and pave the way for that solitary victory- perhaps under duress. Otherwise, any true sucker worth his salt, would believe on this planet that Italy once had been defeated by a minnow and thrown outta the tournament, which the world would ultimately pay to watch the virtual reality of an equally feeble minnow to win the cup and seal their filthy names on that! Would any true sucker worth his salt believe that the invincible giants of Brazil had fallen once on their unstoppable breath-taking run to the glory of laying siege to the cup, and a sucking mediocre footballing nation robbed that trophy by virtue of larceny? Would any sane guy believe that a mighty king who could take his fallen torso up within the bat of an eyelid and chase the assassin for at least 5 yards and baulk at showing the true admirable restraint at one moment, the very next moment he would fall, then limp, then cry like a baby and leave the ground vowing not to take part in this greatest show on earth ever again! What a poorly staged drama, still not enough to fool us. I feel pity for the King. Certainly he did this either under duress (kick those green warty things out to the Mars forthwith), or he did not want to get himself involved in a tainted Cup, which had got its result fixed even before the ball began to roll. The Italians were much more intelligent; they did it much earlier and went home safely. Who, with little bit of grey matter, would love to stay in the country of hooligans and getting stabbed in the course? And the Assassin, Morrais, went scot free in a weird manner, paving the way for an eternal argument in favor of the King, whenever pitted against the 5’5” God, that the former did not get much protection by the referee, for an offense much more heinous than that committed by poor Antonio Rattin, oh, violence of the tongue, has anyone heard of a soccer player getting sent off for that… dubious. Well, this was the time when Evil did triumph over the God, and the hooligans did triumph over a beleaguered team bereft of their captain and best player- three cheers for them, I mean for the Brits, once again. Triumphant, really they were! Only the indomitable West Germans, were not there to take this diktat, writ large on the wall from the very beginning of the tournament, for granted. So, the saga of the ‘No-Goal’ here comes. But, they have been reconciled some 24 years after in the final of the 90. Glorious retreat… err…redress. Coming back to the case of the pack of jokers, the referees, I guess must they have become as rich in those days after the tournament as one J K Rowling now. At last, another quote: you also forgot to mention maradona’s insidious plot to breed future generations of maradonas by marrying his daughter to sergio aguero. we cannot allow further generations of this handballing degenerate to infiltrate pele’s beautiful game.
April 19th, 2010 @ 13:07Well, not to make a reference to their insidious plot to give the world the gift of a tainted people’s hooker (I watch them calling a hooker ‘princess’, they are soooo suave) roaming from town to town chasing after brawny hicks to breed future generations of hooligans to infiltrate and pollute this beautiful planet. Oh, God almighty sees everything; He nipped the plot in the bud and did not allow the mediocre hooligans to triumph over the geniuses.
I hope after all this Fredorracci will erect a giant glow sign board at the outlet of Heathrow that states ‘Beware of Hooligans’. Oh, yes ‘H’ also stands for hookers. i think the best thing England has ever produced is a pack of hookers, hoodlums and hooligans.
April 19th, 2010 @ 14:10Petrified?
April 21st, 2010 @ 07:02Quote: Well, this was the time when Evil did triumph over the God, and the hooligans did triumph over a beleaguered team bereft of their captain and best player- three cheers for them, I mean for the Brits, once again. Triumphant, really they were!
Correction: Well, this was the time when Evil did triumph over the God, and the hooligans did triumph over a beleaguered team bereft of their captain and best player in the way of an ‘Off-side goal, as is evidenced from the video footage available now a day- three cheers for them, I mean for the Brits, once again. Triumphant, really they were!
Yet not petrified?
April 21st, 2010 @ 07:45even in brazil itself people like garrincha or even the fat ronaldo than fucking pele
June 2nd, 2010 @ 01:14We demand comment from the person on this who said ‘fucking Pele, duh’ agh, agh!…
June 4th, 2010 @ 07:04But we must also admit Joe that the fucking writer of this fucking article is also a fucking genius as he demanded his fucking himself to be in one of his earlier fucking post, but he is definitely fucking genius in his unique style of mudslinging by stirring even crystal clear water. Should we send him also to the Mars in the wake of the WC’10, to save our near and dear ones including our children from guys like him? Now, I too, am suave like the Brits, … call hooligans as guys.
June 4th, 2010 @ 07:15After reading the text……I wonder..
June 12th, 2010 @ 07:38Are we discussing about players’ personal life???
If you only watch their goals there’s no doubt pele and maradona were the best EVER,
I DO NOT CARE if BOTH families had drug problems, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT FOOTBALL, JUST FOOTBALL, If not tell us the hole truth not a part of it
I´m not refusing each topic cause this is a FOOTBALL PAGE, and I´m also pretty sure it´s a british page, so maradona is gonna be the evil itself, everybody knows why
England started off on a flier in this WC as one Green, even though he is a goal keeper, could not handle the ball as skillfully as Maradona did. So now see Fredo, how true i was on tagging them mediocre and eyesores… shit!
June 16th, 2010 @ 07:18Quote: England is a great(self-declared) footballing nation with some great(self-declared) footballers.
June 19th, 2010 @ 06:29Now, Freddo, hope u got it straight into your intelligent head after the England-Algeria match yesterday in WC’10. No, this not that the players were out of form, actually the reverse is true. They are in their true form given their mediocre football gene. Tell me right now, how longer we, the rest of the world have to wait until when finally FIFA will ban them from playing any kind of footie on the ground that they bore the whole world to an infinite extent given their way of playing it provided what they play is football at all. now, you see, why we, who have some value for our money, don’t want to pay to watch Mr Terry Butcher and his descendants playing this. Why don’t you give them twenty two footballs right now? Well, now I see what you actually had meant by saying that if God was to pick His all time eleven, Terry Butcher would pick the list first. Of course, not only Butcher, but the rest ten players would also be Brits, as that would have been all time worst eleven.
Freddo, perhaps God, Himself, wants to make a fool of you if He pays that much of attention to u. See the double ‘Hand of God’ … err ‘Hand of Dog’ goal by Fabiano against Ivory Coast yesterday, that the referee directly and FIFA indirectly awarded them, as they always did. On the contrary, they do exactly the opposite against Argentina.
Ex1. Maradona’s discarded goal against Uruguay in the pre-quarter final of WC’86 out of what God knows.
Ex2. A genuine penalty against West Germany in WC’90 final
Ex3. Again a genuine penalty against Holland in quarter final of WC’98 – a slightly less famous case of head butting subsequently by Ortega on Van der Sir(!).
Ex4. To top the list, the completely weird off side goal by England, the nation of the minnows, and a win in quarter final of WC’66.
June 21st, 2010 @ 08:03Me la corro con Pelé!!!!<3
June 24th, 2010 @ 15:30Fredo, Fredo, Fredo – my dear poor Fredo. What you had said once – that one day we all would admit that u r a genius? And today is that day of your life. Come on all my friends, let’s all give some kudos to this genius and garland him to boot – he is as genius as my horse’s arse is. Now, recall what this ordinary fellow, sb, said: ‘On the other hand there you see the Germans – they are superior in every respects of life…’ hope u got it few minutes before. And what a redress of the larceny of 66, it’s what history repeats itself – through that poetic justice. Now tell me how many newsprints you will consume and how many years you all will whine on this baby? And now they are all kicked to Mars (fuck off trolls) – it’s time to savor the beautiful game peacefully.
June 27th, 2010 @ 17:30Now is the time to turn my back on that 5’5” bloated stomach dog’s food. Many may raise their eyebrows after this bizarre hundred and eighty degree turnaround, especially the Argies, and wish me getting thrown to the hell, but be sure there also I will dance naked and walk down on his corpse, which had actually been promised by that fabled God of yours, before the WC’10 began to roll. Don’t guess I do this – this acrobatic piece of turn around, because of the huge and utterly shameful drubbing of Argentina handed out by the mighty Germans, but for the ludicrous drama of resignation launched by the protagonist that I caught through news unfurling through this cobweb, even though I live in a country poles apart from that beautiful Latin American country. I find it nonsensically funny that even if he expressed repeated intensions to resign, he did not do exactly the same yet. What more he desires – to see the Argentine football crumble like a cookie so that no one remembers it other than his contributory part during WC’86, so that Argentine football remains always synonymous with his name paving the way of an eternal argument in his favor by his crazy fans (which I definitely am not) that Argentina could never win a cup except him afterwards just like the case of his arch rival Pele as we have seen in recent past that many crazy Pele fans had argued that Brazil could not win the cup for twenty four years after Pele. The case of Maradona is even stronger – as perhaps Argentina will never win it if this funniest genius remains their coach for perpetuity and then the debate is over: there is no Messi after Maradona, even though he is an equally gifted footballer. Well, I’m not that sortta crazy and mad guy plagued with mad-cow disease, who believed in anything absolute in this vibrant and flowing human race: that there is only one Newton, there is only one Pele, there is only one Marlon Brando, there is only one Elvis Priesly. No, absolutely not, even though they are true geniuses, they are not the absolute greatests, they are one of the greatest in their respective fields, so we did have Einstein, Maradona, Johny Depp, Michael Jackson and many more – so we did have Ronaldinho, Zidane, Ronaldo, Kaka and one little ill fated Lionell Messi to grace the beautiful game of footie. Hope u all got my point, and so I’m so opposed to any sortta bigotry and bah-humbug attitude, any sortta conspiracy caused by the sheer utter greed of any God – be him Pele or the erstwhile ‘Hand of God’ now ‘Dog’s Food’ to remain on the top for perpetuity. Immortality and stagnant puddle are synonymous – these Gods should know. U may wonder that why I say all this – that Maradona conspired against his own country as a coach – the reasons follow – just scroll.
July 7th, 2010 @ 11:34• Maradona had said before the WC started that he had selected a bunch of footballers who could sacrifice their lives for their country. This claptrap had not impressed me that much, yet it made me worry all the more as I took this propaganda as a course of his routine advertisement of patriotism to fool his own countrymen, a crazy sortta cloak and dagger attitude, where he had selected a class of subservient footballers who would lick his boots at his will and what these effeminate footballers did for their country, we have already got the proof. This egomaniac, megalomaniac arseboil did not select one Xavier Janetti, a solid disciplined footballer, Esteban Cambiasso, the hard working midfielder, who could have been an apt match for Schwensteiger, and if he had no intention to field ageing Veron at vital moments, what for he had selected him – to get his rotting skin anointed by him? And what Diego Milito was doing all the while warming the substitutes’ bench? And why Mascherano is the captain, the effeminate defensive midfielder, who could never command possession in midfield even when he plays for Liverpool – was he there so that Messi could see the supply line completely cut off game after game – and Mertin Demichellis, thanks to him for his Bayern Munich experience – the feminine football that he had produced for his club mates representing the opponent in that game is worthy to raise some dubious but legitimate questions. Finally Carlisto, Carlos Tevez, when will u learn to control the ball and understand the deft passes of Messi? Who were you shouting at in that vital moment when u just failed to understand the pass from Messi – a ‘fat brain tube light’ who flashes a bit later when everything is over? If you truly love your country, you should never play for your national team once again. I feel pity for Maradona’s son-in-law, skill wise and brain wise to boot, he is way superior to Tevez, but Maradona, never showed the guts to field him in place of the brawny energetic idiot lest it embroiled him into a debate of nepotism. And when he fielded him, that too in place of a deserving De Maria. Tevez is the worst eyesore of this effeminate Argentina team. And Prima Donna … err … Maradona, the profligate proletariat and progenitor of Messi, did all this to doom his protégé – the young charismatic Messi. Messi may still win a WC for Argentina, but still this history of drubbing will be referred for ever against him which that arseboil actually wished. So the arseboil and Dog’s Food need a kick on his arse plumb and pronto and thrown back to his drug world– okay.