Comments on: Manchester United, Ruud van Nistelrooy, and bloody tears http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/1784/ Football News Sat, 26 May 2012 07:19:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: kwame http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/1784/#comment-124402 kwame Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:13:36 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/21521784.html#comment-124402 sure ruud u will forever be remembered.it came a time when ruud got the ball it ended up at the back of the net.lond live RVN. sure ruud u will forever be remembered.it came a time when ruud got the ball it ended up at the back of the net.lond live RVN.

]]> By: karl http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/1784/#comment-45437 karl Thu, 24 May 2007 07:31:40 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/21521784.html#comment-45437 Just wondering why everyone is so 'on' about the prices of the players. At the end of the day, why should we care if ManU paid 5.5 or 50 mil for a player like Kaka? Do you share in the profits? The important thing is that we get him regardless. The only way we get affected is by the perofrmances on the field...'whether it is pleasing on the eye?' People moan about 18 mil for Carrick instead of 2.5mil...if we paid 2.5, which portion of the 15.5mil would the Glazers have sent us? United has never bought players because they had the money...they bought because they needed the specific players. Just wondering why everyone is so ‘on’ about the prices of the players. At the end of the day, why should we care if ManU paid 5.5 or 50 mil for a player like Kaka? Do you share in the profits? The important thing is that we get him regardless. The only way we get affected is by the perofrmances on the field…’whether it is pleasing on the eye?’ People moan about 18 mil for Carrick instead of 2.5mil…if we paid 2.5, which portion of the 15.5mil would the Glazers have sent us? United has never bought players because they had the money…they bought because they needed the specific players.

]]> By: jobert http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/1784/#comment-45434 jobert Thu, 24 May 2007 07:20:15 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/21521784.html#comment-45434 Ruud, is a brilliant striker in Europe...,,,he can do all things.. Ruud, is a brilliant striker in Europe…,,,he can do all things..

]]> By: Raju http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/1784/#comment-45406 Raju Wed, 23 May 2007 18:31:57 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/21521784.html#comment-45406 Stephen : If he HAD been the target at that point we would have moved for him. We didn't There is a thing called the Club LETTING GO! and its different to a player wanting to LEAVE! Stephen : If he HAD been the target at that point we would have moved for him. We didn’t

There is a thing called the Club LETTING GO! and its different to a player wanting to LEAVE!

]]> By: Stephen http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/1784/#comment-45374 Stephen Wed, 23 May 2007 14:37:00 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/21521784.html#comment-45374 avrv £50m for Zinedine Zidane seems to me one of the cheapest signings we've ever made... i'd totally agree. PURE genius. avrv

£50m for Zinedine Zidane seems to me one of the cheapest signings we’ve ever made…

i’d totally agree.

PURE genius.

]]> By: Stephen http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/1784/#comment-45369 Stephen Wed, 23 May 2007 14:21:30 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/21521784.html#comment-45369 Hargreaves:- If he HAD been the target at that point we would have moved for him. We didn't Carrick:: The promising players that were sold.. Jones etc.... hmmmm.. Vidic: Both Fiorentina and Spartak Moscow issued statements annoucing the agreement Kaka,: My point was £5.5m.. Everyone knew he was the best player in Brazil... again £5.5m.... Yeah he 99% wouldnt have signed as they alweays do better in spain/italy but you see the point. If you don't here it is again £5.5m!!! My point is not that we should necessarily have signed all or any of these. The point is that our outlook seems to be shortsighted, random. Are you happy to pay £12m more than you could have one season before for Carrick etc? Okay they may earn us more than their fees by providing the impetus to win things etc. But I still think that the major point that we show no interest in players, let them have one good season, claim we were always after them then pay stupid money is nothing more of spin. Fans arent that stupid. "We were always after carrick" Hmmmmm riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. If you believe that then you obviously believe everything the plc and Glazers have ever told you... Hargreaves:- If he HAD been the target at that point we would have moved for him. We didn’t

Carrick:: The promising players that were sold.. Jones etc…. hmmmm..

Vidic: Both Fiorentina and Spartak Moscow issued statements annoucing the agreement

Kaka,: My point was £5.5m.. Everyone knew he was the best player in Brazil… again £5.5m…. Yeah he 99% wouldnt have signed as they alweays do better in spain/italy but you see the point. If you don’t here it is again £5.5m!!!

My point is not that we should necessarily have signed all or any of these. The point is that our outlook seems to be shortsighted, random. Are you happy to pay £12m more than you could have one season before for Carrick etc? Okay they may earn us more than their fees by providing the impetus to win things etc. But I still think that the major point that we show no interest in players, let them have one good season, claim we were always after them then pay stupid money is nothing more of spin. Fans arent that stupid. “We were always after carrick” Hmmmmm riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. If you believe that then you obviously believe everything the plc and Glazers have ever told you…

]]> By: Raju http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/1784/#comment-45336 Raju Wed, 23 May 2007 13:28:57 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/21521784.html#comment-45336 Stephen : Mate... I guess you got most of the things absolutely wrong. Hargreaves:- Welcome to earth! We let him SIGN an extension? Anybody with two gray cells would say thats absolute bollocks. Bayern had already lost Ballack to Chelsea and thy didnt want to lose their priced midfield player too soon. And how d you possibly assume "we let him" ? Carrick:- Scholsey/Keano/Gigsey and a promising set of academy players and you wanted Carrick then? And bench Whom? Scholsey? Keano? Come on mate he went to Spurs as a step-up and in search of better "FIRST TEAM FOOTBALL" not chances. Vidic :- How on earth did you assume the Russians had agreed terms with the Fiorentina? Berbatov :- Agreed somewhat. But Berba was NOT the immediate requirement then. A CM/CDM was the absolute requirement. And United is not a team which cannot takes risks now with unknown signings.(Guess Fergie learned from Klebfoot and Djemba Djemba). And there is no unlimited financials . 25M hard cap. Who will you sign? Most needed CM or a good striker when we can just afford with the existing squad? Kaka : Playing too much FM/CM? How many Brazilians were successful in England? Klebfoot came with a huge repo : WC Winner. and after the Kleb incident, i guess Fergie dint want to take a chance. Fair nuff for me. Stephen : Mate…

I guess you got most of the things absolutely wrong.

Hargreaves:-

Welcome to earth! We let him SIGN an extension? Anybody with two gray cells would say thats absolute bollocks. Bayern had already lost Ballack to Chelsea and thy didnt want to lose their priced midfield player too soon. And how d you possibly assume “we let him” ?

Carrick:- Scholsey/Keano/Gigsey and a promising set of academy players and you wanted Carrick then? And bench Whom? Scholsey? Keano? Come on mate he went to Spurs as a step-up and in search of better “FIRST TEAM FOOTBALL” not chances.

Vidic :- How on earth did you assume the Russians had agreed terms with the Fiorentina?

Berbatov :- Agreed somewhat. But Berba was NOT the immediate requirement then. A CM/CDM was the absolute requirement. And United is not a team which cannot takes risks now with unknown signings.(Guess Fergie learned from Klebfoot and Djemba Djemba). And there is no unlimited financials . 25M hard cap. Who will you sign? Most needed CM or a good striker when we can just afford with the existing squad?

Kaka : Playing too much FM/CM? How many Brazilians were successful in England? Klebfoot came with a huge repo : WC Winner. and after the Kleb incident, i guess Fergie dint want to take a chance. Fair nuff for me.

]]> By: Huxley M. M. http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/1784/#comment-45351 Huxley M. M. Wed, 23 May 2007 12:01:00 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/21521784.html#comment-45351 Well, though still a legend to Man U,RVN style could have affected Man U performance. Right now, Man U has proved that it can do without RVN.However, RVN is still a greate striker!!!!!!! Well, though still a legend to Man U,RVN style could have affected Man U performance. Right now, Man U has proved that it can do without RVN.However, RVN is still a greate striker!!!!!!!

]]> By: Tvb http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/1784/#comment-45333 Tvb Wed, 23 May 2007 08:53:38 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/21521784.html#comment-45333 Ruud is a legend! He is so much better then Saha. I don't understand our bondscoach because he puts Kuijt in the team and not 'Van the Man'. This season you can also see he is so good. I doesn't matter which team he scores his goals...topscorer from Spain. A fenomenon! Ruud is a legend! He is so much better then Saha. I don’t understand our bondscoach because he puts Kuijt in the team and not ‘Van the Man’. This season you can also see he is so good. I doesn’t matter which team he scores his goals…topscorer from Spain. A fenomenon!

]]> By: Rach http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/1784/#comment-45304 Rach Tue, 22 May 2007 22:29:51 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/manchester-united-ruud-van-nistelrooy-and-bloody-tears/21521784.html#comment-45304 Ruud will forever be a United legend, however his style of play hurt us despite his goals and therefore we don't need a goal poacher like him in out team again. When you look at United teams over the years, we've never really had the sort of player who will get you 30 goals a season. Ruud slowed our play down and we relyed up on him way too much. We've played much better, free flowing football this year, with goals from all over the pitch. We've played the United way, something we havnt done for a while. Ruud will never be forgotton, but his time has gone and we've been much better for it. Ruud will forever be a United legend, however his style of play hurt us despite his goals and therefore we don’t need a goal poacher like him in out team again. When you look at United teams over the years, we’ve never really had the sort of player who will get you 30 goals a season.
Ruud slowed our play down and we relyed up on him way too much. We’ve played much better, free flowing football this year, with goals from all over the pitch. We’ve played the United way, something we havnt done for a while.
Ruud will never be forgotton, but his time has gone and we’ve been much better for it.

]]>