Comments on: Loyalty Means Nothing – and Lamps Is The Worst Of The Lot http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/ Football News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:17:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Josh http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-97079 Josh Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:18:23 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-97079 While i think this article brings up some good points, i feel that you could argue that chelsea has shown a lack of loyalty too lampard. The signings of Ballack and now deco, both whom play his position, indicate that chelsea feel that Lampards play is on the downside. While i think this article brings up some good points, i feel that you could argue that chelsea has shown a lack of loyalty too lampard. The signings of Ballack and now deco, both whom play his position, indicate that chelsea feel that Lampards play is on the downside.

]]> By: Ahmed Bilal http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96997 Ahmed Bilal Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:40:03 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96997 Agreed with Fateh (#3) on this one. The sums being talked about are a bit ridiculous. IMO Lampard wants respect, and Chelsea aren't giving him that respect. It's a bit like what Robert Green is saying to West Ham - you brought in new players on higher wages but i'm doing better than them so pay me the same or more. Agreed with Fateh (#3) on this one. The sums being talked about are a bit ridiculous. IMO Lampard wants respect, and Chelsea aren’t giving him that respect. It’s a bit like what Robert Green is saying to West Ham – you brought in new players on higher wages but i’m doing better than them so pay me the same or more.

]]> By: Taron http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96902 Taron Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:00:18 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96902 Hey Scott. First time I see you stoping by here. In any way a good post as always from you. Hey Scott. First time I see you stoping by here. In any way a good post as always from you.

]]> By: STALLONE ROCK http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96874 STALLONE ROCK Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:57:28 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96874 there is no difference between pigs and piglets, they are all swines. its not only lampard, its also adebayo, hleb,ronaldo and barry that should be criticise. if u are slating lamps, then do the same to the others. I personally don't see the difference between him and the rest. they are all classical cases of club disloyalty in my opinion. there is no difference between pigs and piglets, they are all swines. its not only lampard, its also adebayo, hleb,ronaldo and barry that should be criticise. if u are slating lamps, then do the same to the others. I personally don’t see the difference between him and the rest. they are all classical cases of club disloyalty in my opinion.

]]> By: Anthony http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96867 Anthony Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:53:37 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96867 Scott, I really like the article but the Lampard scenario (I am sure you will laugh being a red) is like Richard Dunne. It is not exactly the same, obviously Chelsea challenge in competitions and for trophies which is not the case with City, but he probably saw his partner Distin leave last year and win the FA cup. The reason I liken it primarily is because the appointment of Mark Hughes changed his mind, for me Scolari's appointment has perhaps caused Lampard to stick rather than twist. But a great article. Scott,

I really like the article but the Lampard scenario (I am sure you will laugh being a red) is like Richard Dunne. It is not exactly the same, obviously Chelsea challenge in competitions and for trophies which is not the case with City, but he probably saw his partner Distin leave last year and win the FA cup. The reason I liken it primarily is because the appointment of Mark Hughes changed his mind, for me Scolari’s appointment has perhaps caused Lampard to stick rather than twist. But a great article.

]]> By: Eddie Griffin http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96866 Eddie Griffin Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:53:13 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96866 So what happens if Chelsea gave in and gave him his five-year cotnract, and he gets the itch to go somewhere next year? How would Chelsea fans feel about that? So what happens if Chelsea gave in and gave him his five-year cotnract, and he gets the itch to go somewhere next year? How would Chelsea fans feel about that?

]]> By: Tripp http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96858 Tripp Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:16:54 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96858 Salary cap is the only way to fix this. It'll also make for much more interesting title fights. I have no idea how you'd ever implement such a thing. It would obviously have to come from FIFA and be enforced across the globe (but in the main that would mean Europe for the forseeable future). In the end the whole thing's driven by market forces and that's why it gets so lopsided in the league tables. A salary cap seems to be the only way to change that. Salary cap is the only way to fix this. It’ll also make for much more interesting title fights. I have no idea how you’d ever implement such a thing. It would obviously have to come from FIFA and be enforced across the globe (but in the main that would mean Europe for the forseeable future).

In the end the whole thing’s driven by market forces and that’s why it gets so lopsided in the league tables. A salary cap seems to be the only way to change that.

]]> By: Paul N http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96857 Paul N Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:16:10 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96857 Paul C, you are born a Chelsea Fan? that is taking football a little too far, come on dude! Frem, I believe Chelsea paid more for players because they wanted to make sure that they got the player. Chelsea is the reason why this money thing has gootne out of hand. Pay crazy fees for players, put them on the bench to make sure other couldnt buy them, ie SWP, what the hell is up with that. Anyway, this is just what is expected to happen to Chelsea as they have messed up the market for buying players. Is it surprising that the same chickens would come home to roost. Paul C, you are born a Chelsea Fan? that is taking football a little too far, come on dude!

Frem, I believe Chelsea paid more for players because they wanted to make sure that they got the player. Chelsea is the reason why this money thing has gootne out of hand. Pay crazy fees for players, put them on the bench to make sure other couldnt buy them, ie SWP, what the hell is up with that.

Anyway, this is just what is expected to happen to Chelsea as they have messed up the market for buying players. Is it surprising that the same chickens would come home to roost.

]]> By: Watch FREE Football Online http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96852 Watch FREE Football Online Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:24:05 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96852 £130,000 a week is lidicrous - itd take most people well over 6 years to earn that. We all love football, but do the players really deserve such inflated salaries for essentially kicking a ball. I for one think not! £130,000 a week is lidicrous – itd take most people well over 6 years to earn that. We all love football, but do the players really deserve such inflated salaries for essentially kicking a ball.

I for one think not!

]]> By: Andrei http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96851 Andrei Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:11:31 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/loyalty-means-nothing-and-lamps-is-the-worst-of-the-lot/8265/#comment-96851 I cant understand how we are letting our best player in the last year, the soul of the team, the peoples champ go. I think he is feeling frustrating about the thing that they dont want to give him a 5 year contract. HE DESERVES IT! and also he can deserve a more salary.... look at ballacks and shevas contract THEY HAVENT DO ANYTHING FOR THE CLUB!!!! if there is someone that deserves this is Frank Lampard... plz Roman dont let him go.. I cant imagine a Chelsea Inter in champions league with mourinho on the bench and Frank Lampard controling Inter midfield... I cant understand how we are letting our best player in the last year, the soul of the team, the peoples champ go. I think he is feeling frustrating about the thing that they dont want to give him a 5 year contract. HE DESERVES IT! and also he can deserve a more salary…. look at ballacks and shevas contract THEY HAVENT DO ANYTHING FOR THE CLUB!!!! if there is someone that deserves this is Frank Lampard… plz Roman dont let him go.. I cant imagine a Chelsea Inter in champions league with mourinho on the bench and Frank Lampard controling Inter midfield…

]]>