<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Benitez whines but Liverpool still favourites against Bolton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soccerlens.com/liverpool-vs-bolton/976/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soccerlens.com/liverpool-vs-bolton/976/</link>
	<description>Football News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:36:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy Spiridon</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/liverpool-vs-bolton/976/#comment-13504</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy Spiridon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/liverpool-vs-bolton/1340976.html#comment-13504</guid>
		<description>This article has some insight and a considerable point of view, but im sorry Bilal but you&#039;ve went a little overboard with your biased opinion( &quot;still over-achieving considering the team they have.&quot;) . Its TOO biased. I was apreciating the post but it lost some value when ur strong subjective comments were expressed...

well unless you meant to say &quot; UNDERACHIEVING &quot;, then i take back my comment. Because realistically speaking, everyone was speaking about the quality on this side being enough to challenge for the title. so if the club takes 3rd place, or 4th, THATs underachieving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article has some insight and a considerable point of view, but im sorry Bilal but you&#8217;ve went a little overboard with your biased opinion( &#8220;still over-achieving considering the team they have.&#8221;) . Its TOO biased. I was apreciating the post but it lost some value when ur strong subjective comments were expressed&#8230;</p>
<p>well unless you meant to say &#8221; UNDERACHIEVING &#8220;, then i take back my comment. Because realistically speaking, everyone was speaking about the quality on this side being enough to challenge for the title. so if the club takes 3rd place, or 4th, THATs underachieving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

