<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liverpool &#8211; perpetual transition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soccerlens.com/liverpool-perpetual-transition/1020/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soccerlens.com/liverpool-perpetual-transition/1020/</link>
	<description>Football News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 07:05:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/liverpool-perpetual-transition/1020/#comment-16845</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/liverpool-perpetual-transition/14081020.html#comment-16845</guid>
		<description>Dear Soccerlens (damn its founded by you),

  Its fine to be extremely critical if you want the hits for your site. But if you want to do this, then bloody hell stop writing MU articles and get someone who hates MU to do that.

 Or u get a liverpool fan to write liverpool articles and you go back to your club page.

  I can take criticism about liverpool (there are plenty websites doing it already so nothing new). But pls do get an antiMU guy to write MU articles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Soccerlens (damn its founded by you),</p>
<p>  Its fine to be extremely critical if you want the hits for your site. But if you want to do this, then bloody hell stop writing MU articles and get someone who hates MU to do that.</p>
<p> Or u get a liverpool fan to write liverpool articles and you go back to your club page.</p>
<p>  I can take criticism about liverpool (there are plenty websites doing it already so nothing new). But pls do get an antiMU guy to write MU articles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/liverpool-perpetual-transition/1020/#comment-16843</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/liverpool-perpetual-transition/14081020.html#comment-16843</guid>
		<description>Ahmed Bilal,

  You are clearly a strong MU fan. From all your articles on liverpool, almost 90% writes more criticism than necessary. Articles on MU are almost 100% in support of the club. Not to mention the obvious &quot;us&quot; used when associating yourself with MU.

  So here you are with a deceiving neutral website, only to write never-ending criticism for liverpool.

  Its not perpetual. Liverpool by revenue and financial muscle are 4th in the league. Mathematically expected to achieve 4th. Supporters of cos want 1st. The fact that liverpool won CL and got 82 points last year, shows IMPROVEMENT. This year is not over, and we could jolly well get 82 or so points.

  And even if we get sub 80. So what its only a minor set back. Its very clear that the team has improved leaps and bounds since GH days of sitting back on a 1-0 draw. Anyone calling Liverpool negative these days? No.

  Any throphies to show by rafa? Plenty!

  Improvement in epl points? 57 to 82. 

  Minor blip this year ==&gt; conclusion drawn that liverpool is in perpetual transition. 

well done man u fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed Bilal,</p>
<p>  You are clearly a strong MU fan. From all your articles on liverpool, almost 90% writes more criticism than necessary. Articles on MU are almost 100% in support of the club. Not to mention the obvious &#8220;us&#8221; used when associating yourself with MU.</p>
<p>  So here you are with a deceiving neutral website, only to write never-ending criticism for liverpool.</p>
<p>  Its not perpetual. Liverpool by revenue and financial muscle are 4th in the league. Mathematically expected to achieve 4th. Supporters of cos want 1st. The fact that liverpool won CL and got 82 points last year, shows IMPROVEMENT. This year is not over, and we could jolly well get 82 or so points.</p>
<p>  And even if we get sub 80. So what its only a minor set back. Its very clear that the team has improved leaps and bounds since GH days of sitting back on a 1-0 draw. Anyone calling Liverpool negative these days? No.</p>
<p>  Any throphies to show by rafa? Plenty!</p>
<p>  Improvement in epl points? 57 to 82. </p>
<p>  Minor blip this year ==&gt; conclusion drawn that liverpool is in perpetual transition. </p>
<p>well done man u fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Jay</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/liverpool-perpetual-transition/1020/#comment-16628</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/liverpool-perpetual-transition/14081020.html#comment-16628</guid>
		<description>Our youth team are the current holders of the youth F.A cup, and in the the last round this year we knocked out Chelsea. Coupled with the fact that our reserve team is packed full youngters, with a few more being signed recently, as Rafa says Fergie&#039;s had 20 years and Arsehole Wenger 10. In Rafa we trust. YNWA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our youth team are the current holders of the youth F.A cup, and in the the last round this year we knocked out Chelsea. Coupled with the fact that our reserve team is packed full youngters, with a few more being signed recently, as Rafa says Fergie&#8217;s had 20 years and Arsehole Wenger 10. In Rafa we trust. YNWA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

