Comments on: Frank Lampard vs Steven Gerrard – Who’s Better?

By: kkk

kkk — Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:15:23 +0000

Gerrad is better than lampard because gerrard has many skills and he is tallant player gerrard even can turn two or three players but lampard can’t do that

By: Deepak

Deepak — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:57:04 +0000

I think STevie is better than franky..look at match against hungary last week..if single handedly won the match for THREE LIONS..with a incredible 22 yard strike and a technical goal..lampard too is good in shoot..but when it comes to crosses and passes..gerrad is just awesome..lampard might have scored more goals last reason..because players in chelsea are assiting him more.. Overall GErrAd edges over LamPARd.

By: chelsea kid 2

chelsea kid 2 — Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:39:32 +0000

frank is the best end of

By: LfC

LfC — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:51:04 +0000

What shows a great players Quality? I would say it is getting picked to play for his national team. Both players have played for the same national team and the same managers have had the choice of either. You could say that different managers prefer different players however five managers have lead England since Gerrard and Lampard Made their International debuts. Over this period of time Gerrard has picked 84 times whilst Lampard has been picked 82 this may show that both players are of similar standards however Gerrard is two years younger and will probably still be able to play in the Euros two years from now, on the other hand i would say Lampard is way past it as he would be 34 and probably not even playing for chelsea any longer. Therefore Gerrard could quite possibly reach 100 caps proving he is a better player than lampard, not necessarily in my biased opinion, but in the opinion of international recognised managers (which is a considerable better opinion than every petty fan thats commented on here).

Another point that people constantly bring up is the fact that gerrard plays in a poor team so therefore stands out? these comments are completly stupid, notto mention the fact that lampard was bearly heard of when he played for a much poorer team like west ham playing 145 games and only scoring 24 goals.

people may also say that Lampard has Won more prestigous Individual honours however, Voting for a player in a poll is different to picking him in a team. This is prooved by the intrest from other managers in Gerrard during nearly every transfer window since 2003 imparticular by a certain Mr Murinho who had a midfielder who didnt satisfy him called Lampard. Surely if you had such a quality player like Lampard you wouldnt need a terrible player like Gerrard? but the person regarded as the best manager in the world Decided he Needed him.

Finally, i do not believe that the ability of a player can be shown purely by stats they gained at two completly different teams like Chelsea and Liverpool but by the effect he has on a team, the time at which they score their goals and create their assists.

By: jalal

jalal — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:38:53 +0000

GERRRRARD IS THE BEST, HE’S THE LEADER HE’S THE STRONGER HE’S THE CAPTAIN OF ENGLAND………FAR BETTER THAN LAMPARD

By: Leigh

Leigh — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:01:55 +0000

As you say, These two players are both world class and should both be in the team. Its all about getting the balance right and in my mind it means a change of formation. this would be my team

Rooney
Heskey

Lampard Gerrard

Barry

Cole Johnson

Ferdinand Dawson
Terry

James

I feel with a bit of work this would be our best formation, every body playing in there best position, With three at the back and barry covering this gives cole and johnso the chance to get foward and put he crosses in and attack which is the best part of there game. This also means we don’t have to keep trying to solve the infamous left hand side problem. Lennon, walcot, milner and wright philipps are all good but just dont have the end product like cole and johnson. the formation also gives the freedom to lampard and gerrard to do what they do best and get foward and take the game to the oppositon as they know with three at the back and barry covering they dnt have to worry about one of the always covering the other. Of course heskey could be repaced with crouch, defoe or bent ( I would like a fit owen, but nevermind ) but I like heskey and maybe one day he will find those old shooting boots.

Joe cole would be on bench along with parker, upson, milner, walcot, nevlle crouch

Let me know what you think

By: :)

:) — Sat, 12 Jun 2010 23:47:50 +0000

You can’t compare lampard to Stevie cuz Gerrard is much far better than lampard ; he even can’t be near when it comes to passing and crossing ; lampard can’t touch Gerrard when it comes to shooting and skipping and Gerrard is the best player he can play in many positions unlike lampard and Steven shined when he played with World’s best players like kaka, ballack and ronaldinho yet lampard didn’t play with such players cuz he’s not even close to their level .
Playing for Liverpool is the best pride a player can get

By: MYI

MYI — Sat, 12 Jun 2010 23:33:17 +0000

I almost agree with all the ratings except for shooting… Gerrard has far much better shots than Lampard however he lacks consistency … Gerrard is definitely better than Lampard.

By: gopu

gopu — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:11:21 +0000

lampard is d best among dese 2.. such a gr8 captain couldnt gain anything 4 liverpool 4 last few years…!! dats so bad.. n as per d current form, its lampard who peforms better n i think its he,whoz gonna b d playmaker 4 england dis worldcup..!!

By: Chelsea

Chelsea — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 06:01:14 +0000

Both are legends in their club..but when it comes to England lampard is better than stevie G.gerrad is having ability to shoot from long range but he is not as consistent as lampard..gerrad should play as a second winger to rooney..lampard should play at central midfield..