<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there too much international football?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/</link>
	<description>Soccerlens - Football News You Can Trust</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:26:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://soccerlens.com/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KyleAusGooner</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/comment-page-1/#comment-73785</link>
		<dc:creator>KyleAusGooner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/#comment-73785</guid>
		<description>Simply no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perhaps Not Enough International Football &#124; Soccerlens - Football News Blog</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/comment-page-1/#comment-53690</link>
		<dc:creator>Perhaps Not Enough International Football &#124; Soccerlens - Football News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/#comment-53690</guid>
		<description>[...] blogger Nig recently posted an article stating that he thinks there should be less international play, because it affects many clubs in Europe and it generally isn&#8217;t the same quality of play that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogger Nig recently posted an article stating that he thinks there should be less international play, because it affects many clubs in Europe and it generally isn&#8217;t the same quality of play that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jade</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/comment-page-1/#comment-53677</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/#comment-53677</guid>
		<description>Your arguments are biased towards club football, i love international football as it is the purest manifestation of the game, players representing their nations proudly, making their country proud instead of playing for an XXXXXXXXXXXXX amount of $$$$$$$$$$$</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your arguments are biased towards club football, i love international football as it is the purest manifestation of the game, players representing their nations proudly, making their country proud instead of playing for an XXXXXXXXXXXXX amount of $$$$$$$$$$$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/comment-page-1/#comment-53611</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/#comment-53611</guid>
		<description>Yes, there is by far too much football.
I don&#039;t find it half as interesting as league games, and it disrupts the season.
Most players are more interested in club football now, anyway, take the recent events with Jamie Carragher for example. There are however a small number who are focused on international football, and international football alone, take Michael Owen for example.
The people more interested in club football would outweigh the other group every time, and should therefore be scrapped, because if the players are not interested in playing, then the standard is quite clearly less of that in their leagues.

I say introduce &#039;World Cups&#039; for the clubs, instead of the one that runs in December disrupting the league, once again. Introduce the tournament with more teams.
Or even just create a summer cup for clubs within the British Isles. I think that would be a better idea than the current internationals, and even the World Club Cup..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there is by far too much football.<br />
I don&#8217;t find it half as interesting as league games, and it disrupts the season.<br />
Most players are more interested in club football now, anyway, take the recent events with Jamie Carragher for example. There are however a small number who are focused on international football, and international football alone, take Michael Owen for example.<br />
The people more interested in club football would outweigh the other group every time, and should therefore be scrapped, because if the players are not interested in playing, then the standard is quite clearly less of that in their leagues.</p>
<p>I say introduce &#8216;World Cups&#8217; for the clubs, instead of the one that runs in December disrupting the league, once again. Introduce the tournament with more teams.<br />
Or even just create a summer cup for clubs within the British Isles. I think that would be a better idea than the current internationals, and even the World Club Cup..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spizzy</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/comment-page-1/#comment-53604</link>
		<dc:creator>spizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/#comment-53604</guid>
		<description>i wish they&#039;d add some more international games,throw in a semi world cup in th mix if you will.Tired of talking transfer and not watching a decent game for three months.If it wasn&#039;t for copa america and waking up in the morning to watch the highlights and repeats this off season would have sucked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wish they&#8217;d add some more international games,throw in a semi world cup in th mix if you will.Tired of talking transfer and not watching a decent game for three months.If it wasn&#8217;t for copa america and waking up in the morning to watch the highlights and repeats this off season would have sucked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Kaira II</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/comment-page-1/#comment-53592</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Kaira II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/#comment-53592</guid>
		<description>Nig you are too and most commentors on here are too unserious. You should asking for a mandatory winter break for all European clubs in January. On top of a reduction in size of all top leagues to 18. Rather than mourning about international football.  Without international football most foreign nationals would not be able to get work permits all over Europe. Bottom line clubs football has too many games. How the heck can international be blamed for adding a few games to club football that already has close to 70 games in it for top echelon clubs?  Yet they want to blame it on the international calender. Which is nothing sort of stupid.

The only Unified calender Idea that will work is having all the major European leagues, having the same number of teams, starting and ending at the same time,  and a mandatory winter break from early January to mid February.  That break could be set aside for Internationals and tournaments like Nations Cups without affecting the domestic calendar. Furthermore meaningless trophies like League Cups and Carling Cups should be scrapped all together from domestic calendars leaving only the league and local FA CUP&#039;s as the paths to Europe. 

And FYI. The African Nations Cup, Asian Cup and COPA America can&#039;t be played at the same time as the European Cup. It&#039;s obvious first off that the European cup will over shadow both tournaments. Secondly in Africa the summer months of Europe are at the time of the heaviest rains in Africa. When football is next to unplayable. Also people in Europe tend to forget Africa sides are trying to becoming as good as the European ands South American counterparts. Playing a major international football tournament amongst themselves once every four years will not cut the mustard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nig you are too and most commentors on here are too unserious. You should asking for a mandatory winter break for all European clubs in January. On top of a reduction in size of all top leagues to 18. Rather than mourning about international football.  Without international football most foreign nationals would not be able to get work permits all over Europe. Bottom line clubs football has too many games. How the heck can international be blamed for adding a few games to club football that already has close to 70 games in it for top echelon clubs?  Yet they want to blame it on the international calender. Which is nothing sort of stupid.</p>
<p>The only Unified calender Idea that will work is having all the major European leagues, having the same number of teams, starting and ending at the same time,  and a mandatory winter break from early January to mid February.  That break could be set aside for Internationals and tournaments like Nations Cups without affecting the domestic calendar. Furthermore meaningless trophies like League Cups and Carling Cups should be scrapped all together from domestic calendars leaving only the league and local FA CUP&#8217;s as the paths to Europe. </p>
<p>And FYI. The African Nations Cup, Asian Cup and COPA America can&#8217;t be played at the same time as the European Cup. It&#8217;s obvious first off that the European cup will over shadow both tournaments. Secondly in Africa the summer months of Europe are at the time of the heaviest rains in Africa. When football is next to unplayable. Also people in Europe tend to forget Africa sides are trying to becoming as good as the European ands South American counterparts. Playing a major international football tournament amongst themselves once every four years will not cut the mustard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mintox</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/comment-page-1/#comment-53576</link>
		<dc:creator>mintox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/#comment-53576</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a big fan of Rugby but I like how they have an uninterupted dosmestic season, then an International season.

Why not do the same with domestic and international football. By having an uninterrupted season you could finish seaon earlier without the distraction of international football even playing midweek games if needed. Then setting aside a month or two at the end of the season (may and june) to play tournaments or qualifiers which will also give players time to have a break before the start of the next season.

Friendlies seem to be a waste of time, more of a hindrance than a benefit. They&#039;re meant to be practice matches so the national team can get time playing together however the teams rarely play well, never put in 100% and it ends up being an experimentation of players in different formations and positions than their used to. With an international season there is no need to keep having practice matches during the season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of Rugby but I like how they have an uninterupted dosmestic season, then an International season.</p>
<p>Why not do the same with domestic and international football. By having an uninterrupted season you could finish seaon earlier without the distraction of international football even playing midweek games if needed. Then setting aside a month or two at the end of the season (may and june) to play tournaments or qualifiers which will also give players time to have a break before the start of the next season.</p>
<p>Friendlies seem to be a waste of time, more of a hindrance than a benefit. They&#8217;re meant to be practice matches so the national team can get time playing together however the teams rarely play well, never put in 100% and it ends up being an experimentation of players in different formations and positions than their used to. With an international season there is no need to keep having practice matches during the season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandbagger1</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/comment-page-1/#comment-53558</link>
		<dc:creator>sandbagger1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/#comment-53558</guid>
		<description>There are far too many meaningless and mundane friendlies being played and the number of games teams must play within their qualification groups for big tournaments have become very taxing and detrimental to club football.  Top echelon clubs are playing close to 70 matches a year.  Add to that all the internationals thrown in and it is no wonder Ronaldo, Lampard, Gerrard and so many other big name stars had no gas left for their big Champions League or FA Cup matches in April and May.  Is there anything more irritating than waiting all summer for the season to begin in England only to have the teams take 12 days off for international requirements after only one week of Prem matches.  Ridiculous.  I am tired of useless qualifiers like Germany vs San Marino.  FIFA have to wake up and realize that World Football does not have to play fair and allow everybody to compete.  Club leagues have divisions, so must international football.  England, Germany, France, Italy, Spain and Holland should bot have to play more than 6 qualifiers to get into any major tournament.  With that said, the World Cup should be a showcase of the finest national sides on the planet rather than 32 nations.  Have two World Cups with a seeding system based on pedigree and five year form charts.
Make the World Cup 16 to 24 teams and cut out the useless friendlies between giants and minnows unless it is National B sides competing.  The best players in the world are not at their best come World Cup or European Championships time because they have played too many matches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are far too many meaningless and mundane friendlies being played and the number of games teams must play within their qualification groups for big tournaments have become very taxing and detrimental to club football.  Top echelon clubs are playing close to 70 matches a year.  Add to that all the internationals thrown in and it is no wonder Ronaldo, Lampard, Gerrard and so many other big name stars had no gas left for their big Champions League or FA Cup matches in April and May.  Is there anything more irritating than waiting all summer for the season to begin in England only to have the teams take 12 days off for international requirements after only one week of Prem matches.  Ridiculous.  I am tired of useless qualifiers like Germany vs San Marino.  FIFA have to wake up and realize that World Football does not have to play fair and allow everybody to compete.  Club leagues have divisions, so must international football.  England, Germany, France, Italy, Spain and Holland should bot have to play more than 6 qualifiers to get into any major tournament.  With that said, the World Cup should be a showcase of the finest national sides on the planet rather than 32 nations.  Have two World Cups with a seeding system based on pedigree and five year form charts.<br />
Make the World Cup 16 to 24 teams and cut out the useless friendlies between giants and minnows unless it is National B sides competing.  The best players in the world are not at their best come World Cup or European Championships time because they have played too many matches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avrv</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/comment-page-1/#comment-53522</link>
		<dc:creator>avrv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/#comment-53522</guid>
		<description>Yes, in essence I agree. The problem isn&#039;t so much the quantity of matches as the organization of them. There has been talk of a unified calendar for years but it hasn&#039;t really happened.

I totally agree with the argument about the small nations. In fact, I&#039;d go one step further: organize a separate tournament for them. Let them join on a volunteer basis, and limit participation to those countries whose FIFA rankings are below a certain cutoff (say 125 and below, to give an example); you could also put in place other limits such as population. 

But by having a &quot;2nd division&quot; of International football you could make several parties happy. FIFA, which is only interested in making money, would now have double the amount of tournaments, and while it wouldn&#039;t be double the income it would be a significant increase. The smaller countries would receive a lot more exposure and actually have the chance of winning something. The larger (or read: better) countries would not have to waste time and resources on meaningless qualifiers against teams ranked 100 places or more below them.

Back to unifying the calendar: Tournaments should all be played at the same time of the year. I honestly dont care when, but at the same time. It is absurd to have Copa America in odd-numbered years, every two years, it is absurd to have the ANC in February. Just to name two examples. Whether FIFA or the rest of the world likes it or not, UEFA and European Club football are the economic motors of the sport, and should be the primary consideration when making this calendar. There should be a designated time for vacations as well. Players, especially those at the top level, now play a ridiculous amount of matches. Robinho, to name an example, will probably play (between club matches, copa america, and friendlies) 65 or 70 matches in the 2007 calendar year. He is young and can handle it, older players (not old, just &quot;older&quot;) already try to get out of playing many kinds of matches in order to rest. I realize they are millionaires, but the body and the mind have their limits. Let there be a 2 or 3 week period every year when there is absolutely NO football. I think it would be good to avoid saturation, for players and fans.

And qualifiers should be played all together. Not interspersed. Let there be, say, over the 18 month period that is required for qualifiers, 3 or 4 months entirely dedicated to them (example, for the 2010 world cup, set aside: Nov 2008, June 2009, and Nov 2009 as qualification months) this way, teams will gel much better, the quality of football will increase, and there will be fewer issues regarding players traveling around the globe and missing club matches.

Finally, friendlies: more or less, do away with them, with the exception of one or two at the beginning of the aforementioned qualifier months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, in essence I agree. The problem isn&#8217;t so much the quantity of matches as the organization of them. There has been talk of a unified calendar for years but it hasn&#8217;t really happened.</p>
<p>I totally agree with the argument about the small nations. In fact, I&#8217;d go one step further: organize a separate tournament for them. Let them join on a volunteer basis, and limit participation to those countries whose FIFA rankings are below a certain cutoff (say 125 and below, to give an example); you could also put in place other limits such as population. </p>
<p>But by having a &#8220;2nd division&#8221; of International football you could make several parties happy. FIFA, which is only interested in making money, would now have double the amount of tournaments, and while it wouldn&#8217;t be double the income it would be a significant increase. The smaller countries would receive a lot more exposure and actually have the chance of winning something. The larger (or read: better) countries would not have to waste time and resources on meaningless qualifiers against teams ranked 100 places or more below them.</p>
<p>Back to unifying the calendar: Tournaments should all be played at the same time of the year. I honestly dont care when, but at the same time. It is absurd to have Copa America in odd-numbered years, every two years, it is absurd to have the ANC in February. Just to name two examples. Whether FIFA or the rest of the world likes it or not, UEFA and European Club football are the economic motors of the sport, and should be the primary consideration when making this calendar. There should be a designated time for vacations as well. Players, especially those at the top level, now play a ridiculous amount of matches. Robinho, to name an example, will probably play (between club matches, copa america, and friendlies) 65 or 70 matches in the 2007 calendar year. He is young and can handle it, older players (not old, just &#8220;older&#8221;) already try to get out of playing many kinds of matches in order to rest. I realize they are millionaires, but the body and the mind have their limits. Let there be a 2 or 3 week period every year when there is absolutely NO football. I think it would be good to avoid saturation, for players and fans.</p>
<p>And qualifiers should be played all together. Not interspersed. Let there be, say, over the 18 month period that is required for qualifiers, 3 or 4 months entirely dedicated to them (example, for the 2010 world cup, set aside: Nov 2008, June 2009, and Nov 2009 as qualification months) this way, teams will gel much better, the quality of football will increase, and there will be fewer issues regarding players traveling around the globe and missing club matches.</p>
<p>Finally, friendlies: more or less, do away with them, with the exception of one or two at the beginning of the aforementioned qualifier months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/comment-page-1/#comment-53512</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/is-there-too-much-international-football/2365/#comment-53512</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t have put it better myself, I get  so frustrated watching international football which is quite often of a poorer standard than club football.  Although I prefer your idea of smaller but more groups to the idea of teams having to play off to get in, doesn&#039;t seem very fair.  There again by that logic neither is the seeding system...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t have put it better myself, I get  so frustrated watching international football which is quite often of a poorer standard than club football.  Although I prefer your idea of smaller but more groups to the idea of teams having to play off to get in, doesn&#8217;t seem very fair.  There again by that logic neither is the seeding system&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
