Nov
27
2007

Is Brazil 2014 Going to be Safe?

Brasil 2014

There have been at least 8 people killed this week-end, towards the end of a league match after part of a Brazilian stadium collapsed. The accident, which took place at the Fonte Nova stadium in Salvador, occurred after some of the concrete stand fell away with 10 minutes remaining in the game between Bahia and Vila Nova, a team from the nearby state of Goias. Several fans fell through the large hole that was created from one of the highest stands, plummeting around 40 metres. The fans had been celebrating the side’s promotion to the second division. It’s been reported that around 60,000 fans were in the stadium at the time and many were unaware of the tragedy until after the final whistle.

Salvador is in contention to be one of the cities to stage the World Cup in 2014 after Brazil were confirmed as the hosts last month. Upon hearing this news I started wondering – is Brazil going to be safe enough to host the World Cup?

Fonte Nova StadiumThe last time the South-American nation hosted a World Cup was in 1950, that year the Auriverde lost in the final to Uruguay. It was in the same game that boasted a world-record crowd of 199,000. However, even that stadium - the Maracanã in Rio de Janeiro requires a lot of work. The government has issued £550m for the hosting of the event and much of the money will need to be used on the tired and crumbling stadium infrastructure, obviously if sadly highlighted by recent events. Four of the 18 proposed stadiums will have to be completely rebuilt from scratch.

Some of the stadiums’ facilities are so basic they are not even suitable for television commentary! Therefore nearly every stadium will have to undergo extreme makeovers to reach FIFA requirements. As well as the issues surrounding the stadiums Brazil’s domestic football is notoriously rigged with corruption. The country suffers extensive poverty and the increasing problem of drug-related crime.

Ricardo Teixeira, the president of the Brazilian Soccer Federation (CBF) reacted viciously when questioned about the crime levels in his country. “I believe that the violence issue today is an international issue. We had a recent good example during the Pan-American games in Rio - there was no violent event there. If you go to major cities in the U.S. you see kids killing other kids in schools, at least we don’t have that.”

However, research has shown that Brazil’s murder rate is more than four times higher than that of the U.S. The rates for other crimes are also similarly high. The most problematic areas of the country are Rio de Janeiro, Salvador and Recife. Worryingly foreign tourists are the main targets for the criminals, especially at night. A scary thought for fans of the game who will be looking to book their tickets to Brazil. Robbery and “quicknapping” are also rife, especially outside banks and ATM machines. In “quicknapping” criminals abduct their victims and hold them hostage for a short period until a ransom payoff is made by the victims family, business or bank card. Some victims have suffered beatings and/or rapes.

Despite the concerns and poor state of the country their fans are rich in celebrations and will be sure to light up the tournament with their carnival style Samba partying. The opening ceremony will no doubt be a colourful and energetic display as the boys in yellow begin their campaign for a sixth World Cup title. FIFA have been impressed with the initial plans and organisation. If improvement is not made and they fail to meet the standards then a replacement nation will host the event, most likely South Africa dependent on how successful their World Cup is 2010. The same applies to the Africans with Germany being likely backup for them.


Related Items from Soccerlens

| Subscribe via RSS

Discussion - 8 Responses

  1. November 27, 2007emilio calleja

    I think FIFA made a huge mistake to let brazil host the world cup. They should not let a country host the world cup when corruption reigns over the local fa. the world cup should be hosted in europe and the usa always.

  2. “the world cup should be hosted in europe and the usa always”.

    Lol…that is such an ethnocentric and chauvinistic statement.
    I think Japan and South Korea hosted the 2002 tournament pretty well. And I’m sure South Africa 2010 will be great too. As for Brazil, well it’s in 6 years, lets give them time.

  3. I hate to say this since my family lives there, but I think the more immediate concern is whether South Africa 2010 will be safe.

  4. have it in russia let the m play in snow it will be a brutal tough tournament, not many teams in europe win in russia, it gives lesser teams like ukraine russia etc a better chance at success and it allows us to see how adaptabale and how good the super powers like france italy brazil argentina really are. russia hasa lot of money, aritficial turf, adequete stadiums that hold alot off people, and t hey got the technology and the money to fix them up anyways

  5. November 28, 2007SpiralArchitect

    Having the WC in South Africa is a concern if you’re going to talk about safety & crime rates. But they hosted the 2003 Cricket & Rugby World Cups without incident. Though they aren’t on the same level as Football in terms of number of matches played or the amount of foriegn tourists who will come into the country to watch their teams live, its still a good sign that maybe South Africa could pull it off.

  6. Both South Africa and Brazil will have succesful tournaments held there in 2010 and 2014 respectively.
    Yes of course both nations have a high crime rate etc. but that does not in any real way effect the way the biggest football (and sport’s in term’s of tv audiences and attendances) event. They will know that they cannot and will not have the WC often, and FIFA have said on numerous times that the rotation policy will be scrapped, so SA 2010 could be the last World Cup to be held in Africa for a very, (possibly VERY, VERY!) long time, and South America could not host the comp. again for 20-odd years.

    But, as for emilia’s comments of the WC being held in Europe and the US is a shit idea, Korea/Japan will had a good tournament, except yeah it was maybe a little warm and humid for the european based nations, And the WC being in Russia? Maybe one day but at this point of time it prob. wont happen.

    But, as I had just said about the Korea/Japan cup, it was a little hot and humid and that is probabaly the 2nd (behind crime and Stadia not being safe) the biggest problem.

    But, South Africa 2010 and Brazil2014 will be good tournaments…

  7. I think the World Cup should always be held in Australia. It’s just an opinion, mind.

  8. Go too brasil first them make a opnion.
    Safety? anywere in the world is not safe.
    USA is safe?
    Africa is safe?

Subscribe

Get Soccerlens via Email:



Subscribe via RSS

Partners



Latest Articles

Hot Topics

Get Started

Pages

Network Headlines

Partners