Search Menu

Are MLS and the Fans Overreacting Over Cuauhtemoc Blanco’s ‘Pitch Rage?’

Share

Within the last week, the roar around the Chicago Fire’s Cuauhtemoc Blanco and D.C. United’s Clyde Simms incident has swelled and is finally subsiding.

For those who have yet to catch wind of the fracas, reports indicate it took place during the U.S. Open Cup match between the Chicago Fire and D.C. United, beginning with Blanco taking what appeared to be nearly a full swing at Simms’ ribs, who was holding the ball at the time.

Other D.C. players indicated that shortly thereafter, Blanco also gouged Simms’ eye. Naturally Blanco was red carded, as was D.C. United defender Marc Burch, who had come to Simms’ aid. However, Blanco didn’t head straight for the locker room, instead focusing towards the bench. When instructed to change his course to the locker room by a D.C. United employee, Blanco head butted the employee.

“He came up and swung as hard as he could,” Burch told reporters. “He tried to hit the ball and hit Clyde in the stomach. He thinks he can do whatever he wants. I pushed him. I didn’t hit him. I didn’t go after him. I just pushed him down. He’s not going to do that to my teammate. He stood up and tried to poke Clyde in the eye and cut his eye open.”

The other side of the story, as told by the Fire, is that Blanco’s actions were misinterpreted. Fire spokesman Gregg Elkin told Chicago Sports that Blanco wanted to get the ball back in play. The game was in overtime, the Fire was down a goal, and Blanco thought Simms was stalling. Blanco also denied gouging Simms’ eye. As for the alleged head butt, Elkin stated that Blanco was not trying to disobey the red card requirements. As reported by Chicago Sports, “[Blanco] stopped by the bench to pick up his gear,” said Elkin. “He wasn’t stalling or yelling at the official. The situation was under control, but the D.C. person got in his face and yelled at him to leave the bench.” Elkin also took issue with the D.C. United employee entering the Fire’s restricted area, and denied that Blanco head butted anyone. “Blanco turns to walk by the guy and grazed his cheek with his forehead. It was completely accidental.” Elkin later told Goal.com. “[Blanco] stopped on the side of the field to pick up his things, then, when he was turning around, his forehead did make contact with the guy’s cheek or jaw area.”

The federation’s disciplinary committee will meet soon to determine what punishment fits Blanco’s crime, outside of the usual one-game suspension. Elkin stated the Fire will await the federation’s ruling before taking any action. “The federation has asked for video that D.C. apparently has and then that’s up to them.”

Blanco’s anger management issues are far from new. Two weeks prior, reports surfaced that Blanco and Fire teammate Wilman Conde were in an altercation that was described as a “fistfight.” In 2003, Blanco sucker punched a TV Azteca reporter, David Faitelson, who had criticized him, and in 2004, Blanco elbowed a rival player on Brazil’s Sao Caetano team, which spurred a fray between the two clubs. After that incident. Blanco was suspended from playing in South America for a year.

Then, to add insult to injury to some angered MLS fans, the video footage of the recent incident went missing from Youtube. Some fans argued that the MLS had no right to take the footage down, as the U.S. Cup was a non-MLS game. Some conspiracy theories surrounding the MLS surfaced, ranging from the MLS wishing to shut down any other U.S. competition, to taking illegal actions in sending Youtube (who originally aired the footage) an illegal Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMC) take down notice.

MLS fans have generally been unforgiving of Blanco’s actions. On a Big Soccer message board thread, some called for Blanco to be arrested, while some called Blanco a “pathological bully.” On a Section 8 messageboard, Fire fans’ reactions ranged from agreeing that Blanco was out of line who needed at least a 1-2 game ban, to others ignoring it as an overblown incident, to a few who just seemed to believe Blanco’s reaction was indicative of the frustration of the entire team.

While no one should be arguing that Blanco’s actions were acceptable, there does seem to be a degree of overreaction. To begin, there is at least one explanation for what happened with the mysterious Youtube video disappearance. MLS owns and controls all trademarks, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights that relate in any way to the league or any of its teams. (Law for Recreation and Sports Managers, Doyice Cotten, John T. Wolohan, Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, 2003). Thus, because the teams playing were part of the single-entity MLS structure, wherein teams are controlled by the league, MLS apparently still retained its control over any material that flowed from the game. Thus, MLS was fully within its legal authority to ask the video to be removed. While it certainly soured many fans who wished to replay the incident, it also perpetuated the overreaction by making the footage unavailable, leaving it to be interpreted by secondhand description alone.

The upset over Blanco’s behavior, however, cannot be so tidily summarized. It’s difficult to dispute, even without seeing it, that Blanco was out of line, but that’s the more obvious conclusion. The bigger picture, so to speak, is that every other international league has already seen this sort of behavior, albeit not in this context. Who can forget Roy Keane’s performance in the 2001 Manchester derby (doubtful that Alf-Inge HÃ¥land does)? More recently in the 2006 World Cup, Zidane’s infamous head butt, and Wayne Rooney’s alleged crotch kicking to Ricardo Carvalho?

Sure, an eye gouge is irresponsible and out of line. But head butts we’ve seen before, and although non-players are typically out of bounds, that didn’t stop Eric Cantona’s kung fu kick. And Joey Barton, who is currently in jail for assault (punching an individual over 20 times), has a string of antics over the past few years that make Blanco’s actions pale in comparison (see: inciting the Doncaster Rovers — Manchester City brawl after his hacking foul on John Doolan, Barton putting out a cigar on Jamie Tandy’s eye, attacking a 15 year old Everton supporter, attacking and possibly detaching former team mate Ousmane Dabo’s retina, etc.)

Maybe it can all be chalked up to the MLS and its fans refusing to tolerate bad behavior, which is perfectly fine. But both the fans and the MLS seem to have overreacted a bit (calling for Blanco to be arrested, MLS in removing the video). It may be indicative of the MLS’s infancy, as this is one of its first, if not the first, incidents of a player behaving badly and not apologizing for it. Yes, Blanco seems to have an anger problem but so do other players who have been red carded for reacting badly. There’s no argument that Blanco’s actions were both unprofessional and wrong, and if the investigation shows that Blanco truly attempted to punch Simms, gouge out Simms’ eye, and then purposefully head butt a D.C. employee, he should be disciplined further.

Blanco’s actions are nothing to be proud of, but outrageous fouls tend to occasionally come part and parcel with professional soccer, which, despite what some critics will tell you, is exactly what the MLS is.

Football Expert? Prove it! Share your knowledge, tips and comments. Win cash prizes - £11,000 monthly! Join OLBG's free-to-enter tipping competition.

Comments (10)

  1. Your interpretation of MLS’ copyright over that footage is incorrect. An MLS spokesperson told Greg Lalas of Goal.com that MLS does not have jurisdiction over U.S. Open Cup matches, which was their justification for taking no action against Blanco. Open Cup matches are run by U.S. Soccer Federation. Therefore, the copyright on that footage belongs to USSF, not MLS, and only USSF could ask that the footage be removed.

    What’s more, you’re confusing copyright and trademark, which are two separate entities. D.C. United and Chicago Fire are trademarks of MLS, yes, but that does not give MLS copyright over every piece of footage involving those two clubs. If I shoot a video interview with Edson Buddle, MLS can’t claim to own the copyright on that video just because Buddle is wearing something with an L.A. Galaxy logo on it. This is no different.

    Whether MLS disciplines Blanco or not is irrelevant. The point is that they had no right to have this footage of this incident removed from the web, because the Open Cup isn’t under their purview. If they left it up in the first place, there might not have been so much outrage in the first place.

    I take these bogus copyright claims seriously, because if we let the little things slide, eventually, we’ll start letting the big things slide. Corporations are already using the DMCA to silence any sort of criticism against them. We should speak out against all instances of this whenever we can.

  2. I was actually at this game routing for the fire. I plainly viewed the transgression and it really did happen this way. There was a yellow card simms picked up the ball Blanco appeared to have attacked sims for the ball. He then was pushed by burch and retaliated by trying to grab sims head. (thus accidently touching his eye) Then he went back and sat down on the bench obviously tired from the event and the 15 minutes he spent actually playing that night. The DC person came over very angry asking Blanco to leave. Blanco politely through his head into the other mans face, grabbed his bag and left. It was all very sedate.

  3. “Politely through [sic] his head” haha

  4. no, he needs to stop this kind of crap or get out of the league.

  5. MLS fans are a bunch of whiney ballerinas! ITs amazing whata big deal is being out of this. Just another reason for people to make fun on MLS culture and bash the league and its soccer-newbie fans.

  6. I have seen the video on the DC’s Comcast Sport Net It CLEARLY shows the punch with total swing through, totally ugly and if it happened in a semi-pro or club league, it would result in a lifetime ban.

    MLS is a partner of the Open Cup. I would suggest that US Open Cup/USSF had asked SUM/MLS to remove it because it was under investigation.

  7. The only person who makes sense here is Noe, its called FOOTBALL!!!!!!you ignorant Yanks!!!!!Tempers run high when games are on the line and you are fighting to win,No wonder the MLS is full of Ballerinas!!!You sensitive types should be playing golf.

  8. Alex, settle down with the exclamation points, chap. You’re going to injury yourself. My take on the Blanco thing is that you gotta let Blanco be Blanco. The same thing happened with Mamadou Diallo (remember him). He attacked a fan and received like four games and that was it. Suspend him for a couple games and then forget about it.

  9. Blanco’s the perfect example of a footballer who’s uncomfortable with the excessive media attention that envelops the game. He’s at the Fire and in MLS it’s relatively low-key – if he was playing in England he’d have been slaughtered in the press by now.