i've just heard that Chelsea have tabled a bid for Sulley Muntari. The rumor is that Chelsea are going to do an exchange with SWP going the other direction. Perhaps even some money will go Pompey's way.
Smells like the Gallas-Cole deal a few years ago. Clubs are holding us ransom.
WOW!!!
Yeah, right. Muntari's just said he's interested in going to Inter Milan and the move is close to being completed.
No. I don't think so. Chelsea already have way too many attacking midfielder. Time for them to unload Joe Cole!!!
Definitely not. Joe Cole is probably our best winger. He may not get to the byline and cross the ball in, but he is tricky and has a good shot. Malouda has been poor, and Kalou is not a natural winger, or a striker for that matter (backup only).
Well, all I wonder is what this formation is going to be like?
3-7-0?
Get rid of all strikers and wingers and just through in central attacking midfielders and central defensive midfielders, and hell, you don't really even need that many defenders right? psshhh
haha..nice one.
we need a centre mid to replace maka so he would be great.
Muntauri is NOT a defencive midfielder. He's not going to be anything like Makalele! I was joking about Joe Cole, but he'd be great at Old Trafford.
keep dreaming, I know he wont be like makalele but he IS LIKE mikel and he can defend and attack as well. Plus he is close with Essiend they play together also he will fit greatly with the African Group in Chelsea as Mourihno calls it.
Yeah, Xerxes, Essien and Muntauri would be greattogether, but then what of Ballack and Cole? Who needs wingers, right? Anyway, I'mpretty sure it's a done deal with Inter!
So Malouda???
He can play any where attacking mid, left back, on the wings, centre forward. So we gonna keep him. 
GOOD!!!
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But at the Euros,I don't see the functuality of Malouda in France's national team during the competition...but at Chelsea,I can see the functuality of him...
Lets just say he hasnt found his form in Chelse yet and he does play better for france.
If I were a Chelsea fan (bleaaargh!!), I wud want the following stars:
Clement Chantome (PSG)
Giovinco (Juve)
Jeremy Toulalan (Lyon)
Stefan (?) M'Bia (Rennes)
Bafetimbi Gomis (St.Eteinne)
Sorry, that most of them are French, but I'm a France fan, so..
he IS LIKE mikel and he can defend and attack as well.
I SERIOUSLY think Mikel is one of the most DIRTIEST players in the Prem because of his style of play, and I'm so glad he no longer is a ManUtd player.
I change this topic to:
Player Matchups - Jon Obi Mikel vs Paul Scholes...
ginger ninja by far
they are not even similar players, its like saying Stevie G vs Ronaldo.
yeah scholes easy. and carrick beats him and hargreaves and ffletcher and he is about a tie wi th o'shea
yea lets see, we have Essien you guys have fletcher, We have German captain you have an english nobody (Scholes), we have Lampard with Records for mid field you have anderson a flop perhaps (although I like him and think he will do better next yeaar), we have mikel one of the youngest talent in the game , you have a useless giant (OShea), so there is no competition.
scholes an english nobody?when has the england national teams midfield ever performed like they did when he was in it since he retired?how many other players in the premier league can run a game like scholes can?fabregas aside,nobody else.anderson a flop?you must be joking.the most exciting new young player in the premier league last season.mikel is just a bruiser,gets sent off way too much
this retard just called scholes a nobody
lets match this up
scholes is better than lampard by far. lampard cant make the england team. had a trophieless season. and has NEVER been considered a top player in the world. scholes by the age of 30 had 321 apperances for manu and 127 goals. at the age of 30 lampoard hs 110 goals for chelsea in 247 apperances for them. although a better scorer no quite a better player. he has only 2 prem crowns and 1 fa cup..... oh yeah by 30 scholes had 7 prem titles and a champions league. wow.
ok so who is next ok essian well he is the one player we cant match up against to well. he is similar to fletcher but is better so the score is 1-1. next is anderson vs obi mikel. what a joke anderosn is a brazilian international. not only 2 years younger thanb mikel, but he has the ability to match up with the likes of fabragas, and he also was able to score a penalty in the CL final...... i didnt see mikel or john terry do. so so so new boy deco had his day but there is no way he is a better player at 31 than hargreaves is now. he cant really defend or run, and his passing is askew. ballack is a joke he only has 11 goals for chelsea that is one more than o'shea. so lets see about wingers....... WE HAVE RONALDO! YOU DONT NAH NAH so so so it is gigs vs cole were giggs will win easy...... cole is not very pacy but has some nice lucky goals...... look up giggs vs arsenal FA cup 1999 and that is a GOOD PLAYER.
malouda against nani...... ok NANI is a young talent who has scored no less than 4 wonder goals for united. and rooney against SWP..... need i say more. up fron ronaldo who is better than drogba and we have tevez who is better than anelka and you have sheva who has scored less goals in the past than saha who i have seen plaay 4 or 5 time. that is let me see well i will give you ballck and you get essian so it is chelsea 2-8 united
Everyone has different opinions about different players, so lets just leave it as that. I support a different team because I think we have better players, the same with you, so No hard feelings, and lets keep the language under control guys.
I think the problem in this thread is matching up the wrong players.
United have no one like Ballack in terms of playing style and experience.
This thread is being closed, btw. Turned a bit pointless especially since the initial news was bollocks.
This topic has been closed to new replies.
