Everyone Wants To Kick Manchester United
I’ve had enough of ignoramus critics, journalist hacks and piss-minded football fans taking potshots at Manchester United.
It may the case of the last straw that broke the camel’s back, but Rob Smyth’s asinine piece in the Guardian on Monday has got to be the worst case of kick-em-while-they’re-down BS that I’ve seen.
The article, in case you are wondering, is a scathing attack on Alex Ferguson and his role in the recent ‘downturn’ of Manchester United’s fortunes.
The man has taken half-truths and lies and turned them into a saga of a man hellbent on destroying the very club that he had put on the top. It makes for a pretty story, and undoubtedly sells more papers, but not only is it not true, what readers will invariably fail to remember is that:
- A football writer is biased – and this one is biased against Manchester United
- This writer is framing his beliefs for the sole purpose of serving his argument
and….
Where is responsible journalism?
Look at the article rationally, you say? Well, let’s do that
First things first. Is United in a crisis?
The answer depends on your perspective of United’s potential and ability to produce results. We’re in a position for which most other fans would kill for. We’re better off than Arsenal, and I dare say that we have a better team (though not a better midfield) than Liverpool. Carrick’s signing, expensive and misguided it may be, has given the squad balance in its attack. We need to sign another midfielder and possibly a striker (although we could get away with the ones we have).
There are several lies Rob Smyth perpetrates in his quest to prove that United are in a crisis. First, it’s his statement that “No matter how many people they move in for – and if reports are to be believed, United have made offers for dozens of players – nobody wants to go near them”.
Here’s a list of players United have made official bids for this summer:
Michael Carrick and Tomasz Kuszczak. We signed Carrick, and decided not to sign TK when Bryan Robson asked for players plus the 4 mil on offer. Despite the rumours linking us to several players we have not bid for them or even approached their clubs. We have talked to Villareal about Riquelme, but no bid was made. That is IT. Ferguson has been after a creative and a holding midfielder, and he got one of them, and he’s close to getting another.
Surely a columnist from the Guardian has enough resources and knowledge to check his facts before hiding behind the cover of “reports”?
Second, it’s United ‘letting Duff’ slip through our hands. Duff? Hello? Why would United want Duff when they already have four wide players in their squad, 3 of them for the long-term and 1 (Giggs) their most experienced midfielder?
But the BS doesn’t stop there. Next, Manchester United’s second-place finish is criticised on the grounds that Arsenal didnt play well enough and Liverpool and Tottenham are getting much stronger so it is unlikely that it could happen again.
I think we heard the news about Liverpool ‘getting stronger’ last year. They still came third. Despite their improvements to the squad I don’t see them overtaking us next season simply because our squad needs less tinkering. United under-acheived last season, but you wouldn’t believe it if you knew that our first choice central midfield was John O’Shea and Ryan Giggs – a utility defender and an attacking left winger remembered for his runs and goals rather than his bossing of the game.
Two more points that made me boil – one was his attack on the current crop of United players, calling them spoiled and arrogant.
Were you born under a rock? United players are no different than the players at any other top club – overpaid and well-stuffed. They still manage to win games. The players he singled out – Richardson, Ferdinand, Rooney, Ronaldo and Wes Brown – form the core of United’s best starting 11, and are without a shadow of a doubt 5 of the most hard-working players on the field. Ronaldo has his quirks, so do Ferdinand and Rooney, but then Gerrard has this need to be the center of attention, Cole likes to dive, Lampard goes AWOL and Terry can lose concentration.
Players today are well-paid and their quirks are magnified because of the constant media spotlight. It doesn’t change the fact that they are there to play football, and that they are willing to bust their chops to win.
Ferguson was at fault for not reinforcing the midfield last season – but considering that he had Alan Smith earmarked for that role, had Keano and Scholes there already, plus O’Shea and Fletcher to back them up, I don’t see how Ferguson could have predicted Smith’s injury, Scholes going blind, Keano being kicked out, Fletcher being injured and both O’Shea and Giggs (our replacement midfield) being injured. This led to an emergency pairing of Ferdinand and Rooney (two of our best players).
Surely you cannot plan for 6 midfielders being injured at the same time?
Ideally we could have brought in someone else instead of Park last summer (but we needed to plan for Giggs leaving), or a midfielder instead of Evra (we had no left-back with heinze injured and Silvestre needed in the centre of defence). Injuries were a major problem for United last season, yet all people can think about is that we are in a crisis and don’t have any players.
The crisis came and went last season. We survived it, and are stronger as a result (despite the loss of Ruud).
Some valid points were raised about Ferguson, but the author chose to barrack him with baseless accusations instead of listing concerns truthfully. I’ve already covered most of them in this article, so go read that.
The second point was how the writer compared the current crop of players to the ‘men’ of the 90s – Robson, Cantona, Keane. All the talk about Ferguson being from a different era (especially if you throw in Strachan’s rant about how Ferguson didnt treat him right at United) is justified, but are you fuckin’ kidding me? This guy would turn at the drop of a hat and call Cantona a cheating, kicking, flying maniac and talk about all the deliberate tackles Keano made if you gave him the right context. Now he’s singing their praises.
I don’t like Ferguson for the way he’s treated some of our best players, but the fact is that he’s what we’ve got (just like Glazer is what we have) and at the end of the day, we have to make do with what we have. If the old man can knock Chelsea off their fuckin’ perch (as he did to Liverpool), I’ll be the first to bitch-slap every piss-taking United-hater that I see for one whole year.
I’m out.
Topics: Alex Ferguson, Manchester United



Football News 24/7
I emailed Rob regarding this article as it made my blood boil also. He states he has been a United fan for the past 20 years but feels SAF has bought badly since 2001. To his credit he emailed me back on the subject on more than one occassion. Although I disagree with his article he is prepared to discuss why he feels that way and says it isn’t through a dislike of United. I personally feel that come the start of the season with one or two more signings life as a United fan will be a lot more enjoyable.
August 2nd, 2006 @ 21:00Interesting.
So basically this is his stodgy rant on how the club has turned bad?
The fact that he is a United fan does nothing to counter the gross half-truths that he has put in the article as ‘facts’.
SAF has bought badly since 2001? Ruud van Nistelrooy, Saha, Ferdinand, Rooney, Ronaldo, Carrick, Vidic, van der Sar?
The difference is relative – he’s made mistakes (Veron, Djemba Djemba, Miller) and he’s kicked the wrong people out (Beckham, Stam, Ruud, Keano) while some buys just haven’t worked out (Forlan, Kleberson). But really, apart from Arsenal (who have a phenomenal record in the transfer market) which other ‘big’ club has been able to bring in such good players as listed above?
While it’s good to expect a lot out of United, bashing the manager with unfounded BS is not journalism. A monkey could have written that article, and been just as dramatic.
The comparison between ‘men’ and ‘merks’ makes sense now, though.
August 2nd, 2006 @ 21:10I agree with Ahmed, and I would like to dispel a certain fallacy regarding Arsene Wenger. Whilst the pensive Frenchman does indeed have a superb record in the transfer record, we must not forget that he has made his fair share of high-profile transfer blunders. Take Francis Jeffers and Richard Wright as prime examples, while the much-derided Pascal Cygan does little to support Wenger’s résumé. Equally, shedding out some £18 million for Mr Reyes has yet to be justified.
And before Arsenal fans react violently, I still think Wenger is a wonderful manager, with some of his finds among the most astute pieces of transfer business in footballing history. But let’s not idealize Wenger whilst we vilify Ferguson unjustly.
August 3rd, 2006 @ 01:51Hugo, Arsenal have paid less then 10 million for Jose Antonio Reyes so far. The fee COULD have risen to 17 million (not 18), but that depends on him staying a full five years, plus Arsenal winning the Champions League.
IF he is sold in the next 12 months, we’ll have paid only 9.5 for him.
August 3rd, 2006 @ 09:38I have to say guys, I like the forum a lot. Well written articles and intelligent, well mannered people to discuss them. Some of the other sites just have fans abusing each other depending on the colour of your shirt.
Well done.
August 3rd, 2006 @ 13:36Great article!!!
I second your statements at the end:
“I don’t like Ferguson for the way he’s treated some of our best players, but the fact is that he’s what we’ve got (just like Glazer is what we have) and at the end of the day, we have to make do with what we have. If the old man knock Chelsea off their fuckin’ perch (as he did to Liverpool), I’ll be the first to bitch-slap every piss-taking United-hater that I see for one whole year.”
Why are people so quick to remember the bad, but fail to remember the good?
People don’t realise that last season we had MAJOR midfield injuries (very unlucky) and the year before that MAJOR defensive injuries/suspensions at crucial times (also very unlucky). I’m sure that if we’re lucky this season – like SAF hopes for – wrt INJURIES and NOT Winning (we don’t need that much luck to win
), then I’m pretty sure we can not only win, but dominate again.
For the past 2 seasons we had to field “makeshift” teams but were still everybody’s only hope of catching Chelsea…. Arsenal was written off early the season already, Liverpool, well, eveybody waited on the clock to strike 12 ‘o clock for the fairy-tale to come to an end, and all the other teams somehow feared playing Chelsea.
August 3rd, 2006 @ 17:07Come on leave fergie alone.the article is right. how could anyone have predicted all of those injurys that we suffered. in spite that all of our midfield was injured we were luckey in a way….
August 3rd, 2006 @ 21:31firstly, although everyone was saddaned by the departure of roy keane his brialliant parnership with scholes was coming to an end anyway with scholes slowly turning into a slower player who instead of playing almost as a stricker and then running back to surrport keane, was playing in a deeper role more suited to his age.
next, with giggs ‘filling in’ and then turning into a great attacking midfielder, and o’shea transforming into a decent defending midfielder it gives the likes of richadson, eagles,evans,and pique more of a chance of starting next season.With the signing of carrick and probally senna we have a good mix of midfielders both for the future(carrick,fletcher,jones ect) and for now (Scholes, giggs,o’shea) and with our attack built also with this mix, give it 3 or 4 years and we will have a side that will dominate again!
I’ll be putting up Rob’s replies to this article tomorrow.
Stay tuned
August 3rd, 2006 @ 23:05Good article. I get irritated when we get heckled so much as if we finish in the last 5 every year. We set high standards for ourselves and we get disappointed when we don’t reach them. But new teams take some time to form and people don’t understand that and get too impatient. They should go support Chelski then.
August 4th, 2006 @ 03:00U guys r damn hell rite!What’s all this bloody BS that’s goin around that MU’s in a crisis?I agree with u guys that we have been extremely unlucky with injuries to our key players for the past 2 seasons.Even with Ruud out,Rooney was still banging in the goals.We probably need an extra striker but im sure most teams would trade their strikers for ours.Carrick will have to prove himself at MU to justify what SAF paid for his services while Senna looks close to be joinin us as well.Heinze is also back from injury,and would definitely provide more stability to the back line.Hopefully,and i’m crossing my fingers,the english premiership trophy would soon make its way back to Old Trafford.
August 4th, 2006 @ 09:45i am true fan of man united and never get tired when i get talk about the club.But currently i am much dissappointed of fergie’s duty selling goods and simply looking the sky which really making most of the fans to worry about the club and even no one is happy of the current signing.
August 4th, 2006 @ 16:17please,Fergie bring good and critical players that can bring the trouph back to home. Decision is a center for any management and i am waiting for you to bring one midfielder(masherona) and striker either tevezor kuytof holland
bybbybybbbybbbbybbyb
bumping up this article so that hopefully other people will read it.
It’s almost the end of the season, would be interesting to see how people react when they see that this is what united fans were talking about at the start of it.
April 29th, 2007 @ 04:26[...] cut away to Mourinho complaining about penalties and injuries, I think it’s fair to say that Rob Smyth, you deserve a kick from me. Related Items from [...]
May 6th, 2007 @ 22:00[...] that I’ve taken issue with the Guardian many times over their reporting – it started with an article from Rob Smyth on Manchester United’s ‘failings’ before the start of last season (which lead to [...]
September 29th, 2007 @ 00:56