<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everton 1-1 Manchester United &#8211; English Premier League &#8211; 25 October 2008 &#8211; Live Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soccerlens.com/everton-v-manchester-united-english-premier-league-25-october-2008-live-blog/14335/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soccerlens.com/everton-v-manchester-united-english-premier-league-25-october-2008-live-blog/14335/</link>
	<description>Football News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:33:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/everton-v-manchester-united-english-premier-league-25-october-2008-live-blog/14335/#comment-105013</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/?p=14335#comment-105013</guid>
		<description>Actually, he is another Rooney/Tevez. Firstly, Berbatov Never had a prolific goal-scoring record. If United needed a finnisher, there were much better options available. Secondly, for the last few games, Berbatov have been dropping deeper and deeper. on Saturday, Rooney actually played on top. To me, that means &#039;out of position&#039; as you yourself stated that Rooney&#039;s best position is &#039;behind&#039; a striker, not &#039;in front&#039; of a striker.

Berbatov was an emotional buy - someone SAF/we wanted, but not needed. 
1. We needed a finisher, we got another Rooney/Tevez.
2. We needed another striker to make it 4, we got rid of 2 (and now have only 3)
3. We needed to substitute the pace of &#039;the always injured Saha&#039;, we got Berbatov.

I know I&#039;m harsh on Berbs, but that&#039;s because I&#039;m frustrated at:
1. him getting preference over an in form striker
2. my fear of perhaps he will turn out not to be the Cantona I long for.
3. I noticed that United are starting to whip in crosses left right and center ... and he&#039;s not getting underneath any of them.

I really hope he succeeds, I really do...more than this, I hope we defend the double this season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, he is another Rooney/Tevez. Firstly, Berbatov Never had a prolific goal-scoring record. If United needed a finnisher, there were much better options available. Secondly, for the last few games, Berbatov have been dropping deeper and deeper. on Saturday, Rooney actually played on top. To me, that means &#8216;out of position&#8217; as you yourself stated that Rooney&#8217;s best position is &#8216;behind&#8217; a striker, not &#8216;in front&#8217; of a striker.</p>
<p>Berbatov was an emotional buy &#8211; someone SAF/we wanted, but not needed.<br />
1. We needed a finisher, we got another Rooney/Tevez.<br />
2. We needed another striker to make it 4, we got rid of 2 (and now have only 3)<br />
3. We needed to substitute the pace of &#8216;the always injured Saha&#8217;, we got Berbatov.</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m harsh on Berbs, but that&#8217;s because I&#8217;m frustrated at:<br />
1. him getting preference over an in form striker<br />
2. my fear of perhaps he will turn out not to be the Cantona I long for.<br />
3. I noticed that United are starting to whip in crosses left right and center &#8230; and he&#8217;s not getting underneath any of them.</p>
<p>I really hope he succeeds, I really do&#8230;more than this, I hope we defend the double this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Li</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/everton-v-manchester-united-english-premier-league-25-october-2008-live-blog/14335/#comment-104959</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/?p=14335#comment-104959</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure your criticism of Berbatov is fair.  After all, they knew what they were getting with him.  He&#039;s always been a player who was, oh how should I put this, economical with his movement on the pitch.  They didn&#039;t get him so that he could be another Rooney or Tevez.  They got him because he&#039;s a better finisher and goal poacher than either of them.  In fact, the move was probably more about Rooney than anything else.  How many times have people thought that Rooney would play his best behind a natural finisher like Berbatov?  

If the England matches are a trend and not a mirage, then maybe Rooney plays his best with a facilitator like Heskey.  If that&#039;s true, then Man Utd. should have gone after Robbie Keane.  Who knows?  Maybe if United had swooped in before Liverpool got their act together, then they would have had him at 2/3 of the price of Berbatov.  

As for Tevez, I have no idea what&#039;s going on with him.  Things seem okay, but he has that really screwed contract situation, which only makes things complicated.  Maybe Ferguson is pushing Tevez aside because he knows that if Berbatov doesn&#039;t work out, Tevez will step in and play hard for him.  If he benches Berbatov, then the sulking will start, and no one wants that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure your criticism of Berbatov is fair.  After all, they knew what they were getting with him.  He&#8217;s always been a player who was, oh how should I put this, economical with his movement on the pitch.  They didn&#8217;t get him so that he could be another Rooney or Tevez.  They got him because he&#8217;s a better finisher and goal poacher than either of them.  In fact, the move was probably more about Rooney than anything else.  How many times have people thought that Rooney would play his best behind a natural finisher like Berbatov?  </p>
<p>If the England matches are a trend and not a mirage, then maybe Rooney plays his best with a facilitator like Heskey.  If that&#8217;s true, then Man Utd. should have gone after Robbie Keane.  Who knows?  Maybe if United had swooped in before Liverpool got their act together, then they would have had him at 2/3 of the price of Berbatov.  </p>
<p>As for Tevez, I have no idea what&#8217;s going on with him.  Things seem okay, but he has that really screwed contract situation, which only makes things complicated.  Maybe Ferguson is pushing Tevez aside because he knows that if Berbatov doesn&#8217;t work out, Tevez will step in and play hard for him.  If he benches Berbatov, then the sulking will start, and no one wants that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/everton-v-manchester-united-english-premier-league-25-october-2008-live-blog/14335/#comment-104953</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/?p=14335#comment-104953</guid>
		<description>1. Rooney has matured a lot
2. He still needs to work on 1 or 2 little issues
3. I personally loved his badge-kissing.

Why does everybody shy away from the real problem in United&#039;s squad - Berbatov? He totally nullifies our counter-attacking play. I desperately want him to succeed because a) I yearn for another Cantona, and b) we paid a piss lot for him. Unfortunately, I don&#039;t feel he has delivered yet. We also cannot use the excuse about him not being match-fit anymore. IMO, he should have been subbed instead of Rooney. In fact, Tevez should have started instead of him.

Oh, and why the hell take Rooney off and not bring on his supposed substitute? I really think that all is not well in the United camp, regardless of what the PR states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Rooney has matured a lot<br />
2. He still needs to work on 1 or 2 little issues<br />
3. I personally loved his badge-kissing.</p>
<p>Why does everybody shy away from the real problem in United&#8217;s squad &#8211; Berbatov? He totally nullifies our counter-attacking play. I desperately want him to succeed because a) I yearn for another Cantona, and b) we paid a piss lot for him. Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t feel he has delivered yet. We also cannot use the excuse about him not being match-fit anymore. IMO, he should have been subbed instead of Rooney. In fact, Tevez should have started instead of him.</p>
<p>Oh, and why the hell take Rooney off and not bring on his supposed substitute? I really think that all is not well in the United camp, regardless of what the PR states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Li</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/everton-v-manchester-united-english-premier-league-25-october-2008-live-blog/14335/#comment-104951</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/?p=14335#comment-104951</guid>
		<description>Fine.  We&#039;ll agree to disagree.  Not listening to reason is a two-way street, though.  And clearly, you are more than a little biased TOWARDS Rooney.  I&#039;m pretty sure that if you took a poll of most journalists, players, officials, commentators, and other people connected to the game, they would say that Rooney has matured considerably, he is still prone to letting his emotions get the better of him.  Let&#039;s face it, you could probably say that about most footballers.  That&#039;s all I&#039;m saying.  You can&#039;t look at everything in a vacuum.  

But whatever.  Bottom line is that Man Utd. has a huge deficit to make up and they haven&#039;t done well in big games this year.  Regardless of which one of us is correct (and I&#039;m man enough to admit that the truth is probably somewhere in the middle), they need him to continue playing well.  Otherwise, they&#039;ll be battling it out for 2nd or 3rd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine.  We&#8217;ll agree to disagree.  Not listening to reason is a two-way street, though.  And clearly, you are more than a little biased TOWARDS Rooney.  I&#8217;m pretty sure that if you took a poll of most journalists, players, officials, commentators, and other people connected to the game, they would say that Rooney has matured considerably, he is still prone to letting his emotions get the better of him.  Let&#8217;s face it, you could probably say that about most footballers.  That&#8217;s all I&#8217;m saying.  You can&#8217;t look at everything in a vacuum.  </p>
<p>But whatever.  Bottom line is that Man Utd. has a huge deficit to make up and they haven&#8217;t done well in big games this year.  Regardless of which one of us is correct (and I&#8217;m man enough to admit that the truth is probably somewhere in the middle), they need him to continue playing well.  Otherwise, they&#8217;ll be battling it out for 2nd or 3rd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will D</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/everton-v-manchester-united-english-premier-league-25-october-2008-live-blog/14335/#comment-104939</link>
		<dc:creator>Will D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/?p=14335#comment-104939</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s clear that you&#039;ll hear nothing of reason, so I guess we&#039;ll have to agree to disagree. I haven&#039;t brought up any absolutes; I haven&#039;t said a player&#039;s past is irrelevant to his future, nor have I suggested that a player&#039;s past provides an explicit determination of his future. I have said only that the maturation of any player, especially those, like Wayne Rooney, who have began their media-exposed professional careers at a very young age, is a natural process, and that for Rooney this is no different.

To suggest that it is reasonable to assume that Rooney is the same hotheaded player that he was when he was 18 is ridiculous. He has attained a reputation that proceeds him, and that is what his actions on the pitch have been measured by, and compared to. It is a bias that permeates most Man U coverage, even by those that support the club. It is not at all fair for you to assume that he lacks control of his emotions, or that his innate aggression as a player cause him to be excessively volatile. 

I would only ask that you objectively view his performance and demeanor from match to match; even within the same season, a player can undergo radical change. There is no reason to assume that, in the absence of a prolonged string of performances confirming your bias that it can be assumed fairly that those biases are still warranted. Wayne Rooney has become a much cleaner and more mature player, and he has been so now for quite some time. 

That&#039;s not to say that he is not an aggressive player, and I would agree with you that it is what makes him such a special player. I am simply disappointed that your bias exists in advance of any recent performance in which he has confirmed it. Your only example being the penalty against Chelsea proves my point - show me a current string of offenses, not just one isolated incident in an otherwise thus far clean and composed season of football.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s clear that you&#8217;ll hear nothing of reason, so I guess we&#8217;ll have to agree to disagree. I haven&#8217;t brought up any absolutes; I haven&#8217;t said a player&#8217;s past is irrelevant to his future, nor have I suggested that a player&#8217;s past provides an explicit determination of his future. I have said only that the maturation of any player, especially those, like Wayne Rooney, who have began their media-exposed professional careers at a very young age, is a natural process, and that for Rooney this is no different.</p>
<p>To suggest that it is reasonable to assume that Rooney is the same hotheaded player that he was when he was 18 is ridiculous. He has attained a reputation that proceeds him, and that is what his actions on the pitch have been measured by, and compared to. It is a bias that permeates most Man U coverage, even by those that support the club. It is not at all fair for you to assume that he lacks control of his emotions, or that his innate aggression as a player cause him to be excessively volatile. </p>
<p>I would only ask that you objectively view his performance and demeanor from match to match; even within the same season, a player can undergo radical change. There is no reason to assume that, in the absence of a prolonged string of performances confirming your bias that it can be assumed fairly that those biases are still warranted. Wayne Rooney has become a much cleaner and more mature player, and he has been so now for quite some time. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say that he is not an aggressive player, and I would agree with you that it is what makes him such a special player. I am simply disappointed that your bias exists in advance of any recent performance in which he has confirmed it. Your only example being the penalty against Chelsea proves my point &#8211; show me a current string of offenses, not just one isolated incident in an otherwise thus far clean and composed season of football.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Li</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/everton-v-manchester-united-english-premier-league-25-october-2008-live-blog/14335/#comment-104927</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/?p=14335#comment-104927</guid>
		<description>Really?  A player&#039;s past has no bearing on what he&#039;ll do in the future?  If you have a guy who has repeatedly choked on penalty kicks in the past, would you put him out there to take a penalty in the future?  If you have a guy who has had trouble staying healthy, would you give him a massive contract?  Sports is all about past performance.  The reason why Real Madrid wants Cristiano Ronaldo so badly isn&#039;t just because they hope he&#039;ll score 40 goals for them.  It&#039;s also because they know he&#039;s done it in the past and they think he can do it again.  

As for Rooney, I&#039;m not saying that he&#039;s still some crazy hothead.  I recognize that he&#039;s made great strides and matured considerably.  But let&#039;s not be deluded.  He&#039;s not Mother Theresa out there.  In fact, I think his edge is what makes him a special player.  Roy Keane was the same way.  Rooney wouldn&#039;t be as effective if he had Giggs&#039; demeanor, for example.  Still, as much as he&#039;s matured, he is still prone to lapses in judgment.  After all, his petulant and stupid foul in the Chelsea match was what led to their equalizer.  

I don&#039;t see it as &quot;bias.&quot;  In fact, I think it would be biased of me if I acted like a homer all the time and defended his or any other Manchester United player&#039;s actions regardless of the situation.  Take Cristiano Ronaldo, for instance.  Does he have a reputation as a diver?  Yes.  Has he been doing that less and less as compared to his early EPL career?  Yes.  But does that mean that it&#039;s unfair to question his intentions when he goes down to the ground?  Absolutely not (in fact, Bolton fans would have a pretty good case on that point).  I&#039;m not saying that you never outgrow your reputation.  But there&#039;s a difference between relying on bias and relying on history.  Clearly, I wasn&#039;t the only one relying on history.  Sir Alex was doing it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?  A player&#8217;s past has no bearing on what he&#8217;ll do in the future?  If you have a guy who has repeatedly choked on penalty kicks in the past, would you put him out there to take a penalty in the future?  If you have a guy who has had trouble staying healthy, would you give him a massive contract?  Sports is all about past performance.  The reason why Real Madrid wants Cristiano Ronaldo so badly isn&#8217;t just because they hope he&#8217;ll score 40 goals for them.  It&#8217;s also because they know he&#8217;s done it in the past and they think he can do it again.  </p>
<p>As for Rooney, I&#8217;m not saying that he&#8217;s still some crazy hothead.  I recognize that he&#8217;s made great strides and matured considerably.  But let&#8217;s not be deluded.  He&#8217;s not Mother Theresa out there.  In fact, I think his edge is what makes him a special player.  Roy Keane was the same way.  Rooney wouldn&#8217;t be as effective if he had Giggs&#8217; demeanor, for example.  Still, as much as he&#8217;s matured, he is still prone to lapses in judgment.  After all, his petulant and stupid foul in the Chelsea match was what led to their equalizer.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see it as &#8220;bias.&#8221;  In fact, I think it would be biased of me if I acted like a homer all the time and defended his or any other Manchester United player&#8217;s actions regardless of the situation.  Take Cristiano Ronaldo, for instance.  Does he have a reputation as a diver?  Yes.  Has he been doing that less and less as compared to his early EPL career?  Yes.  But does that mean that it&#8217;s unfair to question his intentions when he goes down to the ground?  Absolutely not (in fact, Bolton fans would have a pretty good case on that point).  I&#8217;m not saying that you never outgrow your reputation.  But there&#8217;s a difference between relying on bias and relying on history.  Clearly, I wasn&#8217;t the only one relying on history.  Sir Alex was doing it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will D</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/everton-v-manchester-united-english-premier-league-25-october-2008-live-blog/14335/#comment-104920</link>
		<dc:creator>Will D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/?p=14335#comment-104920</guid>
		<description>The &quot;fact&quot; is that maturation on the pitch is a natural process for all players in any sport, and soccer is no different. The &quot;fact&quot; is that it is not at all fair to hold the past of a player against him, and to assume that what he has done in the past is what he will continue to do in the future. The &quot;fact&quot; is that Wayne Rooney has, and will continue to mature, and he has shown over the past few years a sharp decline in the rash displays of emotion he had previously become known for. The &quot;fact&quot; is that you, as many others, allegiances aside, have come to love to hate Wayne Rooney for the reputation that he has come to earn, that no longer as nearly applies to his style of play or his level of maturity on the pitch presently. 

Regardless of the respect you may have for him, you still clearly hold his past against him. Wayne Rooney has made tremendous strides to cut down on displays of emotion during matches. I just think that it&#039;s a shame that people like you will continue to hold his past over his head, especially when his past is a remnant of his teen years, where any player could be expected to be less mature than one would prefer. He is obviously not the same player he used to be, and it&#039;s time for you and others to start giving him the credit he deserves. Don&#039;t seek to confirm your bias against him with each challenge you deem overly reckless, or for each booking - because these instances have drastically and persistently been reduced, and will continue to decline in the coming years, as he continues to mature.

And as a bit of an afterthought here... I&#039;m not calling you names - quite the contrary. I&#039;m trying to help you see how your biases are affecting your perception of the player. I&#039;m not being rude or confrontational, I&#039;m just stating the facts. The facts here simply contradict what you have come to believe, and that&#039;s a shame. I hope you&#039;ll take a closer look the next time you watch a Man U game, because I think that if you watch objectively, you will see a stark contrast in Rooney&#039;s play from what you have convinced yourself is true of his playing style and level of maturity. He is not a dirty player (anymore), he is not an immature player (anymore), and he has worked hard to reduce displays of emotion on the pitch that affect his play negatively, or that put him at greater risk of booking. He&#039;s got a bad reputation, that he no longer deserves, and I hope you and others will come to recognize that sooner rather than later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;fact&#8221; is that maturation on the pitch is a natural process for all players in any sport, and soccer is no different. The &#8220;fact&#8221; is that it is not at all fair to hold the past of a player against him, and to assume that what he has done in the past is what he will continue to do in the future. The &#8220;fact&#8221; is that Wayne Rooney has, and will continue to mature, and he has shown over the past few years a sharp decline in the rash displays of emotion he had previously become known for. The &#8220;fact&#8221; is that you, as many others, allegiances aside, have come to love to hate Wayne Rooney for the reputation that he has come to earn, that no longer as nearly applies to his style of play or his level of maturity on the pitch presently. </p>
<p>Regardless of the respect you may have for him, you still clearly hold his past against him. Wayne Rooney has made tremendous strides to cut down on displays of emotion during matches. I just think that it&#8217;s a shame that people like you will continue to hold his past over his head, especially when his past is a remnant of his teen years, where any player could be expected to be less mature than one would prefer. He is obviously not the same player he used to be, and it&#8217;s time for you and others to start giving him the credit he deserves. Don&#8217;t seek to confirm your bias against him with each challenge you deem overly reckless, or for each booking &#8211; because these instances have drastically and persistently been reduced, and will continue to decline in the coming years, as he continues to mature.</p>
<p>And as a bit of an afterthought here&#8230; I&#8217;m not calling you names &#8211; quite the contrary. I&#8217;m trying to help you see how your biases are affecting your perception of the player. I&#8217;m not being rude or confrontational, I&#8217;m just stating the facts. The facts here simply contradict what you have come to believe, and that&#8217;s a shame. I hope you&#8217;ll take a closer look the next time you watch a Man U game, because I think that if you watch objectively, you will see a stark contrast in Rooney&#8217;s play from what you have convinced yourself is true of his playing style and level of maturity. He is not a dirty player (anymore), he is not an immature player (anymore), and he has worked hard to reduce displays of emotion on the pitch that affect his play negatively, or that put him at greater risk of booking. He&#8217;s got a bad reputation, that he no longer deserves, and I hope you and others will come to recognize that sooner rather than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Li</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/everton-v-manchester-united-english-premier-league-25-october-2008-live-blog/14335/#comment-104852</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/?p=14335#comment-104852</guid>
		<description>Will, my allegiances don&#039;t matter in this case.  I&#039;m actually a Man Utd. fan, but that doesn&#039;t mean I have to look at them with rose-colored glasses and support them in every single instance.  Frankly, if I wanted to be a cheerleader for them, then I wouldn&#039;t cover any other matches besides Man Utd. matches and I would never criticize them for anything (like the dropped points to Chelsea where Rooney&#039;s rash foul led directly to the equalizer).  I actually love Wayne Rooney and think he&#039;s unfairly criticized by most of the media.  That being said, he isn&#039;t above criticism.  While I didn&#039;t agree with the booking, I&#039;ve seen enough over the years to know that, in an emotional situation, his barometer starts to go up.  That doesn&#039;t mean that he was going to snap and suddenly break Phil Neville&#039;s jaw or something, but it does show that Ferguson was concerned enough about what COULD happen that he had to take off his best offensive weapon.  

It&#039;s amusing how you think your &quot;opinion&quot; is actually a &quot;fact&quot; while my &quot;opinion&quot; is stupid.  You don&#039;t need to resort to name-calling.  Frankly, I&#039;m entitled to my opinion just like you are entitled to your&#039;s.  Maybe you&#039;re cranky because you had to stay up until 6 AM.  Who knows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, my allegiances don&#8217;t matter in this case.  I&#8217;m actually a Man Utd. fan, but that doesn&#8217;t mean I have to look at them with rose-colored glasses and support them in every single instance.  Frankly, if I wanted to be a cheerleader for them, then I wouldn&#8217;t cover any other matches besides Man Utd. matches and I would never criticize them for anything (like the dropped points to Chelsea where Rooney&#8217;s rash foul led directly to the equalizer).  I actually love Wayne Rooney and think he&#8217;s unfairly criticized by most of the media.  That being said, he isn&#8217;t above criticism.  While I didn&#8217;t agree with the booking, I&#8217;ve seen enough over the years to know that, in an emotional situation, his barometer starts to go up.  That doesn&#8217;t mean that he was going to snap and suddenly break Phil Neville&#8217;s jaw or something, but it does show that Ferguson was concerned enough about what COULD happen that he had to take off his best offensive weapon.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s amusing how you think your &#8220;opinion&#8221; is actually a &#8220;fact&#8221; while my &#8220;opinion&#8221; is stupid.  You don&#8217;t need to resort to name-calling.  Frankly, I&#8217;m entitled to my opinion just like you are entitled to your&#8217;s.  Maybe you&#8217;re cranky because you had to stay up until 6 AM.  Who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liverpool_Fan</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/everton-v-manchester-united-english-premier-league-25-october-2008-live-blog/14335/#comment-104849</link>
		<dc:creator>Liverpool_Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/?p=14335#comment-104849</guid>
		<description>If Chelsea win (which i strongly think they will) this could be very, very bad for the title race. There might not be one this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Chelsea win (which i strongly think they will) this could be very, very bad for the title race. There might not be one this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/everton-v-manchester-united-english-premier-league-25-october-2008-live-blog/14335/#comment-104848</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/?p=14335#comment-104848</guid>
		<description>Can nobody see that Park should not be in the united team--he adds nothing to the team and 30 million sitting on the bench!!Where is the effort in Berbatov?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can nobody see that Park should not be in the united team&#8211;he adds nothing to the team and 30 million sitting on the bench!!Where is the effort in Berbatov?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

