You blame the entire failure of England’s national side on two reasons. The first is the PRemier League, where you state that too many sides have foreign owners and foreign lineups. It is unfortuante that you are completely retarded regarding this issue.

Foreign owners make little difference in how the English national side actually performs. If the owners do anything, it is to provide money to bring in the best club competition for English players in the form of international players. How does reducing the amount of these overseas stars help the Three Lions at all? It doesn’t; if you did, you would be reducing the best competition for England’s best players, who would then cakewalk against the obvious lack of talent that would replace foreign talent from the English academies and youth systems.

One becomes the best by playing the best; you seem to suggest that Terry, Lampard, Gerrard and Co. could possibly be better internationally by playing less skilled players on a regular basis. Do you know how pathetic that sounds?

In regards to firing the FA, keep in mind that the recent English struggles have only been centered around Euro 2008. On a whole, English futility in major competitions, a longer period of time than the current FA has presided over, makes no difference on the current FA. It is obvious that you want to blame the FA, but why? The turnover in the organization has been in existence for the entire span of England’s futility. Rather than the FA, place the blame on the underperforming players and the lack of clutch play that has seemingly haunted this team for at least the last several years.