England 2-1 Switzerland – Should We Hold The Taxi?

England 2-1 Switzerland – Should We Hold The Taxi?
England 2 (40′ Jermaine Jenas, 62′ Shaun Wright-Phillips)
Switzerland 1 (58′ Eren Derdiyok)

As tempting as it would be to lay it into Fabio Capello (alternatively, we could all renounce international football like some club football fans – you know who you are), this was Capello’s first game, and just as England under McClaren could not afford to celebrate after beating Greece 4-0, England under Capello cannot afford to wallow in their own piss after a dominant-but-unconvincing 2-1 win over the Swiss.
.

england fa217px England 2 1 Switzerland   Should We Hold The Taxi? swiss fa217px England 2 1 Switzerland   Should We Hold The Taxi?

Let’s recap (2006, 2008, it’s pretty much the same thing):

  • England give the ball away easily.
  • England have a central midfield problem – when one midfielder shows up the other goes missing.
  • England lack width on the left – and it is KILLING them.
  • England do not defend well just in front of their box.
  • Why do England right midfielders with the initials DB come infield so much? Lack of pace?
  • Crouch is NOT the man to lead England’s attack.

I’m tempted to say that I was impressed, but that would be missing the cow’s arse while swinging a elephant-sized banjo. What does go to England’s credit – and for this I commend the newcomers as well as the old guard – is that they adapted to the new formation and acquitted themselves with credit. Memo to Macca and Tel: try a (relatively) new formation at HOME, in a FRIENDLY, against a considerably WEAKER team.

As time went on, England began to impose themselves and I feel that apart from one or two errors (especially the one that led to Derdiyok’s goal) and few missed chances (which would have been put away by a better-oiled team), England had this pegged at 4-0 without hitting fourth-gear. Rooney will be disappointed, questions will be asked of Barry and Gerrard, and will someone please play Joe Cole from the bench?

One thing though – with Capello you feel that he was trying a few players out and giving them a shot in a friendly instead of putting them in the line of fire later on. Brown, Upson and Jenas are not going to be regular starters, and despite the strong showing by David Bentley, he loses out to SWP on pace. So if you consider the number of new players and you consider that with Hargo playing from the start, Richards and SWP on the right and maybe Bentley on the left, this could have been a cracking team.

Alright then, time for the player-by-player bit…

.

England’s Finest

David James – a few problems, including a mishit kick but otherwise a smooth ride. Is Capello relying on James to get them through the qualifiers or does he intend on taking him to South Africa 2010? Hopefully the game against France, which is England’s first real test, will tell us more.

Wes Brown – he did OK but anyone who has seen the last few matches England have played will tell you that Micah Richards is the better right-back. Anyone who has seen Manchester United play will tell you that Brown takes time to grow into his role.

Rio Ferdinand – he should have challenged Derdiyok before the Swiss debutant fired off his shot, but otherwise a quality performance.

Mathew Upson – shock starter for many but to be fair acquitted himself well. Don’t see him replacing Terry though.

Ashley Cole – his attitude has been his strongest asset throughout his career (don’t look at me, Liam Brady said so) and he proved it again here when, despite making a few errors, he came off having delivered another solid performance. First choice left-back for England.

David Bentley – grew into his role as the match progressed and clearly reveled the extra space and responsibility he had in the center of the park after Jenas came off and Bentley moved infield in the second half. He lacks a bit of pace and as a result isn’t the ideal right winger, but on today’s evidence (and seeing his attitude on the pitch), he should go to South Africa 2010.

Steven Gerrard – captain fantastic had a quiet game although when it counted, he delivered with a driving run and assist. Perhaps the midfield was too crowded for him, but Stevie G had a quiet game.

Jermain Jenas – another player who, if this was a club side, would have deserved an extended run. He grew in confidence and clearly deserves another chance. He should be more aggressive going forward though, and for that he’ll need to fine-tune his understanding with Rooney.

Gareth Barry – was OK, but to be frank a 3-man central midfield doesn’t suit his talents.

Joe Cole – one moment of brilliance and a couple of nice jinks, but with the stage set for an easy start, why not play Ashley Young and give him 45 minutes or more with Rooney and co? Cole’s been tried more times than Peter Crouch, and that’s saying a lot. He’s a good player, with limitations, and this was the perfect opportunity to test a new player. Oh well, next time maybe?

Wayne Rooney – was given too much to do in the first half and had little support. In the second, he should have taken at least one of the many chances presented to him. Another run of ‘bad form’?

Peter Crouch (sub) – Ineffective, to be honest, but he was the best choice to bring on if England were to persist with the 4-2-3-1.

Shaun Wright-Phillips (sub) – his pace troubled the Swiss throughout and once he is restored to the starting lineup with Richards behind him, England will have a formidable right flank to trouble any opposition.

Wayne Bridge (sub) – didn’t get enough time to show that he can do better than Ashley Cole, but he’s an able left back and England are lucky to have such depth.

Owen Hargreaves (sub) – the only England midfielder (Rooney doesn’t count) who was snapping at the heels of opposition players. England need him, or they need someone else to start playing like him.

Ashley Young (sub) – not enough time on the pitch to register any impact. A shame, because 45-60 minutes here would have told us if he was good enough to face France next month.
.

England’s BIG Super Power

What do Micah Richards, Shaun Wright-Phillips, David Bentley, Wayne Rooney, Ashley Cole and Owen Hargreaves have in common?

These players share a refreshing and extremely positive attitude on the pitch towards the game. They always want the ball, they’re always moving and when they get the ball, they make something happen.

With due respect to stalwarts like Gerrard and Lampard (both of whom are excellent players), the old guard simply does not have the bite that these players have. They are superior in talent (add Rio and Terry to this bunch too, as well as Joe Cole), but they don’t have that energy on the pitch that can lift moods and change games.

Hopefully this bunch (and players like Jenas) will get more opportunities in the future.
.

England 2-1 Switzerland – Goal Videos

England 1-0 Switzerland (Jenas)
England 1-1 Switzerland (Derdiyok)
England 2-1 Switzerland (SWP)
.

Capello Verdict

I hope that he got what he wanted out of this game. The big positive was Bentley, although Jenas did a fair job too. The big downside was the absence of tactical nous, which I hope will come with time as Capello instills his brand of discipline into this squad. It’s a long journey, but so far the big positive has been in team selection, not so much in tactical improvements (although with Hargo starting, 4-2-3-1 should be harder to beat – but if England can’t score through it, there’s little point…).

Then again, Capello’s Real Madrid won despite defending like crap. If England are going to go to South Africa and get to the quarters again by playing crap, I think I’ll still take it.

Topics: England, Fabio Capello, Features, Football Videos, Match Reports

Email This Post Email This Post

More

14 Comments

  1. Graham Fisher

    Pretty fair summing up Ahmed. I thought we did look better when Crouch came on to be fair. Rooney just can’t play as a lone striker.

    We’ve had a problem on the left for so long and I thought that Ashley Young might be the answer. The only real disappointment for me tonight was that he didn’t get his chance.

    February 7th, 2008 @ 00:22
  2. Brian W

    Joe Cole from the bench? He was one of the best players on offense England had today. He’s probably the most creative, dangerous English player with the ball at his feet. I only fail to see why Ashley Young didn’t play more, knowing what you have in Joe Cole and this was really a match to decide on personnel. Joe Cole should be starting for Three Lions for every major match, but maybe not on the wing and instead in amore central attacking role that allows him to float about the pitch.

    Gerrard was poor except for his assist and a flick heel to Crouch. No inspiration from the stand-in captain. Can’t wait until Terry returns to partner with Rio, who played well.

    Bentley should probably start ahead of SWP. I love my Chelsea boys, but SWP’s passing is too inconsistent from the wing, and Bentley’s is much better. He is also a natural on set pieces, and I think SWP is better as a bench player, where his pace can come alive against tired defenses, like it did today. Three Lions survived before with a slower right winger whose passing was superb (initials DB) and it seemed to work ok.

    Would love to see a healthy Lampard playing well in front of Hargreaves or Barry picking up the defensive slack, with Gerrard coming off the bench.

    February 7th, 2008 @ 01:13
  3. paolo

    capello is just a lucky coach. i dont think it was switzerland at its best. but, should not take this result too seriously. they are out of euro championship after all.

    February 7th, 2008 @ 04:16
  4. Tippo

    This was only the first game under the new coach and I think England did alright. And also it was a friendly. Lets wait and see what happens in the coming matches.

    February 7th, 2008 @ 04:52
  5. Haider (Pakistan)

    I compare England with teams like Argentine and Brazil whenever England plays a game. I might be wrong but I do not see that flair, that mode and that body language in England which are clearly observable in the other two teams. Why? Does Team England take football as leisure time activity while for Argentine and Brazil, it is do or die thing? Furthermore, 100% of English players play in the same league. Contrarily, Arg. and Braz. players are dispersed around Europe and Latin America playing in different conditions and with different mentalities. Even then, they come along as a strong unit. What is the reason of below par performance then?

    February 7th, 2008 @ 06:33
  6. Hugo Steckelmacher

    A few things, Ahmed. I agree that Ashley Young should have been given a lot more time, but I can’t quite understand your negative comments about Joe Cole. Cole nearly always performs well in an England shirt, in or out of position. As for Gareth Barry, Barry has been playing in a 3 man central midfield for large chunks of the season at Villa. He just had a disappointing game today, that’s all.

    I thought Jenas was superb, and it pains me to say it. He just seemed to have so much desire to have the ball! We can’t drop him for the next game.

    Finally, I am marginally concerned by Rooney. He went for yet another delicate chip which was never on and did miss a few reasonable chances. I know that goals will eventually come, but you can’t deny that he’s in a mini-slump.

    February 7th, 2008 @ 08:46
  7. Ahmed Bilal

    Did anyone notice that Capello left the note-taking to Stuart Pearce, and talked about watching video replays after the game to analyse the match fully?

    Wow, that IS new…

    February 7th, 2008 @ 09:07
  8. Ahmed Bilal

    Hugo,

    Rooney – in a mini-slump for sure.

    Jenas will improve with more games, but Cap won’t drop Gerrard and Hargo did better than Barry in the few minutes he played. I agree that Barry simply had an off day, but you can’t afford to do that with the limited chances one gets at international level. Plus as a holding midfielder you need to be tackling more and winning the ball more, not let players go by you – I know this was a friendly but still…

    Joe Cole – fair enough, I’m critical of him (I suppose in comparison Wes Brown was the worst of the England players but then again we don’t hype him up as England’s #1 right-back, do we?) but that’s for a few reasons.

    First, he’s not a genuine left-sided player, which means that we play too narrow with him on the left of a 4-4-2. He does better in a 4-3-3 / 4-5-1 but he’s far better as a left central midfielder than a left wide midfielder.

    Second, I don’t understand all the praise he got yesterday – he’s very good at what he does, for sure, but he cannot be England’s ONLY left-sided option, can he? SWP has faults, Lennon has faults – in the same vein, Cole has his faults too, and our over-reliance on him can cost us sometimes.

    Under McClaren, when the SWP / Richards combo was on fire on the right, you could see how much of a difference pace and width made on that flank. We never get that on the left with Cole. He’s great at cutting in, but once you have a solid right-back marking him and / or a holding midfielder to mop things up ahead of his defence, Cole’s game is severely restricted.

    Saying that Cole does well is like saying that Beckham does well. I love Beckham to bits and want him in the England lineup, but practically speaking he gives England excellence in just one dimension. Cole is a bit similar, which is why I rate him more as an impact player than as a regular starter.

    That’s not to say that we won’t win with him – it’s just that if I was there, I would have tried other people in his place. It’s not like a club where you need to buy a new player you know, we have the people available to us already.

    February 7th, 2008 @ 09:18
  9. Ahmed Bilal

    Haider,

    the attitude of the players on the pitch matters, and I think part of Capello’s focus will be to change that attitude / bring in players with the right attitude.

    Also, this was an experimental squad used to give a few players experience before more important games. They grew better as the match wore on, which as a Guardian columnist said, is positive and quite different from the past regimes.

    February 7th, 2008 @ 09:20
  10. Neil Jones

    Crouch innefective is a bit harsh…his flick allowed Rooney to feed Gerrard for the 2nd goal, he forced a good save from the keeper with a good volley and set up another chance for Gerrard, albeit slightly behind him. I think Rooney played better after Crouch came on.

    I thought Gareth Barry was the only real disappointment, he didnt keep the ball well at all and looked a bit out of his depth as Gerrard, Rooney, Bentley & Jenas all raised their game….

    Good to see a bit of energy about the display though, Bentley added a lot on the right, getting stuck in and running at players, Joe Cole did well in bursts, he is a match winner and Capello i think will use him as often as possible, im not convinced Young is good enough yet anyway and Downing hasnt done enough at this level despite a good season with Boro.

    Jenas was a big plus point, he is back to the form he showed for Newcastle circa 2002 and lets hope he can keep that up.

    February 7th, 2008 @ 10:11
  11. Karl

    Maybe I’m just negative or pessimistic, but to me Capello seems like SvenII. His approach is still too defensive, therefore as some commentor mentioned, the lack of flair.
    Why didn’t the FA appoint come Brazilian coach perhaps?

    If 4231 is England’s future under Capello, I would suggest to use Rooney in the middle of the 3, Owen upfront. I know Rooney is in a bit of a slump at the moment, but he will NEVER be the great goal-scorer that his position requires. He is also too impatient (which is not necessarily a bad thing) which causes him to drift inwards when he doesn’t get fed. (Don’t Capello know this?). He is made for a Maradona-like role – not as a point man.

    My suggestion would be to drop Gerrard back as one of the 2 central midfielders (strangely enough, I think him and Carrick could do well there) and play J.Cole / Rooney / SWP or Lampard as the 3 forwards (that said, would love to see Jenas/Bentley included more), and Owen up top.

    Seems pretty fine to me on paper…

    February 7th, 2008 @ 10:46
  12. Graham Fisher

    I agree with Neil, I thought Crouchy did OK when he came on and England looked a lot better for it.

    I also agree with Karl that Rooney can’t play as the lone striker. He obviously doesn’t like doing it, and he is so much more effective coming from deeper positions and with his back not to goal. He comes deep to look for the ball and then when our midfield players win possession, they have no outlet ahead of them.

    February 7th, 2008 @ 10:53
  13. RMJ

    joe cole was englands best player out there and he has preformed quiet well from teh left wing for england always…ashley young should given some run in matches but Cole is ahead here…barry was waste…his passing was very astray..gerrard was decent but could have done better considering its his first match as captain…upson should never play again and brown should not start ahead of richards even if hes good squad player…crouch was bit wasteful though he did miss couple of volley sitters..

    February 7th, 2008 @ 12:38
  14. Hugo Steckelmacher

    I have just read Gareth Barry’s interview and found many things amusing. Firstly, he stated that he felt quite comfortable playing the holding role in a three-man central midfield:

    “With two midfielders ahead of you, you tend to get a lot of the ball which suits my game,” he continued. “I enjoyed it out there.”

    Secondly, in a comment which says a lot about Capello’s thinking, Barry revealed that Fabio was a lot happier with the first-half performance than the second – the complete opposite of most English fans and pundits. Presumably, because we had the ball under much better control and our passing was more measured, whereas we gave away chances (and the goal) in the second half.

    “He’s very pleased with the first half,” Barry told Sky Sports. “There were a few things in the second half we could have done better”

    February 7th, 2008 @ 12:55

More from SoccerLens
Content SoccerLens
Soccerlens offers a free weekly newsletter with: Soccerlens is read by over 1,000,000 readers each month - come join the community!