Jan
20
2008

Does Having Two More Referees On The Pitch Beat Video Technology?

Referees

Fabio Capello recently offered compliments to England referees when he observed how infrequently they stop the game. Capello praised the match officials, stating:

“The first thing I noticed were the referees because they whistle so little compared to those in the rest of Europe.”

Statistically his inference that the England refs tend to let the game play on more than their European counterparts is correct. The Premier League referees currently allow 25 free kicks per game, the lowest average in Europe. The referees dole out about 3.2 yellow cards a game, also the lowest when compared to the averages in the neighboring leagues: 4.5 a game in Italy and 5.5 per game in Spain.

The English referees are also much closer to the game, staying about 14 meters back from the action, 9 meters less than just two years ago. The English refs run about 7.5 miles per game to stay so close. But these statistics are silent on whether or not the referees are accurate and the introduction of goal line technology could give us those statistics.

But in an effort to further avoid goal line technology, while still providing potentially more accuracy, UEFA proposes introducing two extra assistant referees in the penalty area at both free-kicks and corners. UEFA is still experimenting with placing the extra officials behind the goal line or on the pitch itself. Said UEFA spokesman William Gaillard: “The game’s a lot faster now, it’s hard to keep up with play all the time…Some people say it is better for them to stay behind the goal, others that it is better for them to be inside the penalty area so that things that go on such as pulling and pushing are properly sanctioned.”

UEFA got the green light from the International FA Board to test this option starting with youth tournaments, and depending on those results, two more referees could be introduced at the professional level as an alternative to goal line technology. These extra refs would act as the linesman does now, communicating their observations and opinions to the referee via radio.

This development is illustrative of UEFA’s awareness in safeguarding the game from erroneous calls, but UEFA may simply be stalling an inevitable change in the game, choosing instead to add more of the same than something completely different. Yet if football has to change, adding two more officials is counterproductive if the goal is to give the player’s fairness and accuracy.

Adding two more referees has its own problems. It adds another layer of human error and inconsistency that will alter the flow of play. It still changes the traditional form of the game, a change that opponents of goal line technology decry. It will add costs to the game for the clubs and the league, and in the long run may be more expensive than the technology. It requires two more competent referees for every game.

It also adds two more bodies to the pitch for the players to work around. And while in theory it gives the referees more help, it also adds two more points of view that will inevitably at times be at odds, leaving fans to ask why there isn’t a video available for all three on field referees to refer to.

Sources:

English refs are Europe’s most lenient
Capello quotes

Related Items from Soccerlens

| Subscribe via RSS


Discussion - 6 Responses

  1. Simple. No.

  2. January 20, 2008emilio calleja

    introduce goal line technology

  3. It ruined cricket i dont want that same thing to happen for soccer.
    Dont you like sometimes people punished for nothing?I do when its with Arsenal and Chelsea. :P

  4. Goal-line techonolgy is the one thing that football desperately needs, not another two referees. Something quick like hawk-eye would be aweseome, and if you can’t get that then leave the game as it is. It is not that bad.

  5. Hello

    I’m in favor of full support of video technology in football. I believe if done cleverly it won’t noticeably impact on the flow of the game. And it can be done rather easily to give better results than the current standard of refereeing. With time of course things will improve and there will be no compare. IMO it’s not a matter of if but of when, and it should be sooner rather than later.
    See details at my site http://www.FairFootball.com .

    As for the question at hand, I think it’s rather simple. A ref with video evidence is better than one without. 3 refs with video evidence are better than 3 without. And before they consider fielding a 3-rd team, the one of the refs, with 7+ men to run on the field and really ruin the game, they should consider how much more useful 7 additional refs would be that sit comfortably in their chairs, watch their professional video evidence equipment, well trained and organized. There’s no way on earth results wouldn’t be better than the current mess.
    BTW, part of this video evidence equipment should be one or more small video cameras that the on-field ref carries on him, to see exactly what he sees plus much more. Except that there will be more eyes to analyze it. I assume it could be done technically.

    FF

  6. seems to me like a desperate showing of the fear present amongst the older generations at UEFA and the FA; the fear of modernisation of the game. it’s my understanding at the moment that the numbers of officials available for matches are low as it is, so if that is the case then how are we going to manage to find so many extra officials to accomodate for this proposed plan. the one proble i can see with goal line technology, and video evidence in general, is the potential impact it could have on what is a smooth-running game. one of the things i can’t stand about rugby is the constant stopping and starting, but i think that video evidence in football could be managed so it has minimum impact on how the game runs. it could also be used to embarass those players guilty of going down easily, or just plain diving, and would almost entirely eliminate the factor of human error.

Add Your Comment


Comments are moderated (our comments policy).



Partners

Euro 2008 Tickets
Advertise here

Subscribe


Add to my Widsets

Subscribe via RSS


Get Soccerlens via Email


Have Your Say:

Latest Articles

Hot Topics

Get Started

Pages

Network Headlines

Partners