Comments on: Did Tottenham and Liverpool over-pay for Bent and Torres? http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/ Football News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:17:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Eaton http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-120191 Eaton Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:41:36 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-120191 Lol just saw this, looking on 2 years would you say torres is overpriced then? No hes one of the best strikers in the world and worth well over 27 million Lol just saw this, looking on 2 years would you say torres is overpriced then? No hes one of the best strikers in the world and worth well over 27 million

]]> By: Ian http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-86333 Ian Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:04:37 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-86333 No. 66 ... Jeremy ..... don't you feel a prat now? Steve (67) is correct that Torres was only 20 million and we got something like 4.5million for Garcia. Read the recent interview with Benitez he spells it out exactly what we paid! So as Steve mentions 16 million net is a bargain for the best striker in the Prem! All the paper talk at 27 million .... it went up in every new print of the transfer story. When will people learn all that newspapers are really for is wrapping up yer chips! No. 66 … Jeremy ….. don’t you feel a prat now?

Steve (67) is correct that Torres was only 20 million and we got something like 4.5million for Garcia.

Read the recent interview with Benitez he spells it out exactly what we paid!

So as Steve mentions 16 million net is a bargain for the best striker in the Prem!

All the paper talk at 27 million …. it went up in every new print of the transfer story. When will people learn all that newspapers are really for is wrapping up yer chips!

]]> By: Steve http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-86300 Steve Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:33:14 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-86300 Well for starters Liverpool's deal with A Madrid is initially for somewhere around the 20m mark (this will increase with number of goals and appearances, trophies won etc.) not 26.5 as widely reported(which will be the maximum we pay) . Add into this equation the 4m obtained for Luis Garcia and then we are down to about 16m. Now correct me if I'm wrong but 29 goals in 41 starts doesn't seem too bad a return for that layout. As for someone aboves comments that Torres is so poor you feel sorry for him all I can say about this is you obviously have no idea what football is and perhaps if you have no knowledge it probably best to keep your mouth shut!!!! Well for starters Liverpool’s deal with A Madrid is initially for somewhere around the 20m mark (this will increase with number of goals and appearances, trophies won etc.) not 26.5 as widely reported(which will be the maximum we pay) . Add into this equation the 4m obtained for Luis Garcia and then we are down to about 16m. Now correct me if I’m wrong but 29 goals in 41 starts doesn’t seem too bad a return for that layout. As for someone aboves comments that Torres is so poor you feel sorry for him all I can say about this is you obviously have no idea what football is and perhaps if you have no knowledge it probably best to keep your mouth shut!!!!

]]> By: Jeremy http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-68035 Jeremy Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:52:06 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-68035 over-priced LOL the manager always change people Torres is so poor i am sorry for him' Bent is even worse... over-priced LOL
the manager always change people
Torres is so poor
i am sorry for him’

Bent is even worse…

]]> By: harasuké http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-68015 harasuké Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:26:37 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-68015 no,dude. i'm re-reading it. how much s..t has been written above with no objectivity. i was afraid bent was crap n he proved me right. torres- thx god, he's fantastic. but i think we should give them another 3-4 months n make another evaluation... no,dude. i’m re-reading it. how much s..t has been written above with no objectivity.

i was afraid bent was crap n he proved me right.

torres- thx god, he’s fantastic. but i think we should give them another 3-4 months n make another evaluation…

]]> By: King Kong http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-67765 King Kong Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:32:03 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-67765 Even though nobody is reading this, but I think the results says it all after 3 months. Torres = super buy, would fit into any 1st team in the world Bent = grossly overpriced, would struggle even to be in the bench of any 1st team in the world...well at least he would struggle to get a bench in liverpool, ask crouch. Even though nobody is reading this, but I think the results says it all after 3 months.

Torres = super buy, would fit into any 1st team in the world

Bent = grossly overpriced, would struggle even to be in the bench of any 1st team in the world…well at least he would struggle to get a bench in liverpool, ask crouch.

]]> By: ARSENAL FAN http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-51414 ARSENAL FAN Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:42:49 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-51414 OFF COURSE THEY PAID OVER THE ODDS HENRY REALLY WORTH 60M FORGET AGE 16M CANT BELIEVE HE LEFT HES A LEGEND GD LUCK IN THE FUTURE BENT UNDERACHIEVEING 16M REALLY WORTH ABOUT 10M TORRES 27M STUPID SILLY MONEY IF HE SIGNS 4 LIVERPOOL THEN HE SHUD B TOP SCORER OR HES A FLOP AS A ARSENAL FAN I INSIST ITS A GOOD THING WE DIDNT GET TORRES THESE FOLLOWING PLAYERS HUNTERLAAR VILLA ETO BABEL ANELKA OWEN MARTINS R BETTER THEN THE OVER RATED SPANIART HES PROB WORTH 12M OFF COURSE THEY PAID OVER THE ODDS
HENRY REALLY WORTH 60M FORGET AGE 16M CANT BELIEVE HE LEFT HES A LEGEND GD LUCK IN THE FUTURE
BENT UNDERACHIEVEING 16M REALLY WORTH ABOUT 10M
TORRES 27M STUPID SILLY MONEY IF HE SIGNS 4 LIVERPOOL THEN HE SHUD B TOP SCORER OR HES A FLOP
AS A ARSENAL FAN I INSIST ITS A GOOD THING WE DIDNT GET TORRES THESE FOLLOWING PLAYERS HUNTERLAAR VILLA ETO BABEL ANELKA OWEN MARTINS R BETTER THEN THE OVER RATED SPANIART HES PROB WORTH 12M

]]> By: Omar http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-51274 Omar Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:14:47 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-51274 I think Bent is a very talented striker and his work rate is exemplary - he times his runs very well too. 16.5m is a lot of money but Berba needs to rest......too many games will result in an injury. Jol and Commolli are doing a fine job BUT a 16.5m midfeilder is required....jenas / zokora are not quite the ticket for me... COYS! I think Bent is a very talented striker and his work rate is exemplary – he times his runs very well too. 16.5m is a lot of money but Berba needs to rest……too many games will result in an injury. Jol and Commolli are doing a fine job BUT a 16.5m midfeilder is required….jenas / zokora are not quite the ticket for me…

COYS!

]]> By: simmy http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-51239 simmy Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:16:16 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-51239 arsenal finished 4th with henry out for most games. wat makes u think AW will sit and watch spuds challenge for 4th. Last season was undoubtedly arsenal's worst and spurs best and we STILL finished 8 points ahead of them. at their best spuds cant challenge us. arsenal will challenge for 2nd or 3rd whilst spuds battle it out with everton,newcastle and man city. just watch. sorry spuds fans but its the truth. its ur destiny 2b in our shadows for eternity.deal with it losers. arsenal finished 4th with henry out for most games. wat makes u think AW will sit and watch spuds challenge for 4th. Last season was undoubtedly arsenal’s worst and spurs best and we STILL finished 8 points ahead of them. at their best spuds cant challenge us. arsenal will challenge for 2nd or 3rd whilst spuds battle it out with everton,newcastle and man city. just watch. sorry spuds fans but its the truth. its ur destiny 2b in our shadows for eternity.deal with it losers.

]]> By: harry http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-51208 harry Sat, 30 Jun 2007 02:21:58 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/did-tottenham-and-liverpool-over-pay-for-bent-and-torres/2213/#comment-51208 Sidharth- Thanks for stating the obvious. Regardless of who owns a player's registration, Media and fans of those clubs I have already mentioned, on every occasion have taken advantage to post their jealousy by fabricating stories and trying to be critical about Chelsea. Now a couple of Yanks come with spoils of the war from Iraq, trying to mimick Chelsea strategy. Naturally I wonder if you have ever heard of the word irony. Sidharth- Thanks for stating the obvious. Regardless of who owns a player’s registration, Media and fans of those clubs I have already mentioned, on every occasion have taken advantage to post their jealousy by fabricating stories and trying to be critical about Chelsea. Now a couple of Yanks come with spoils of the war from Iraq, trying to mimick Chelsea strategy. Naturally I wonder if you have ever heard of the word irony.

]]>