Comments on: Chelsea v QPR: Clash of the Titans? http://soccerlens.com/chelsea-v-qpr-clash-of-the-titans/5107/ Football News Fri, 25 May 2012 18:33:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Ahmed Bilal http://soccerlens.com/chelsea-v-qpr-clash-of-the-titans/5107/#comment-74973 Ahmed Bilal Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:12:20 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/chelsea-v-qpr-clash-of-the-titans/5107/#comment-74973 You guys DO know that the two games were at different times, correct? BBC showing the Villa-United game had nothing to do with the importance (or lack thereof) of other games :) You guys DO know that the two games were at different times, correct? BBC showing the Villa-United game had nothing to do with the importance (or lack thereof) of other games :)

]]> By: american http://soccerlens.com/chelsea-v-qpr-clash-of-the-titans/5107/#comment-74933 american Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:46:39 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/chelsea-v-qpr-clash-of-the-titans/5107/#comment-74933 the BBC would probably have picked this match if QPR were at home where there is more chance of an upset. the manu/villa game wasn't great, but IMO, i think it was still more interesting than this game the BBC would probably have picked this match if QPR were at home where there is more chance of an upset. the manu/villa game wasn’t great, but IMO, i think it was still more interesting than this game

]]> By: Steve Cooper http://soccerlens.com/chelsea-v-qpr-clash-of-the-titans/5107/#comment-74687 Steve Cooper Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:29:01 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/chelsea-v-qpr-clash-of-the-titans/5107/#comment-74687 1-0 loss wasn't that bad to say that Chelsea have been working up to where they are since we were relagated back 1996. They've had 3-4 years of their cash injection to be where they are now (not top of the league ha ha ha). But to go there and only lose to an accidental own goal proves where we'll be in a few years to come.... COME ON YOU R'S 1-0 loss wasn’t that bad to say that Chelsea have been working up to where they are since we were relagated back 1996. They’ve had 3-4 years of their cash injection to be where they are now (not top of the league ha ha ha). But to go there and only lose to an accidental own goal proves where we’ll be in a few years to come….

COME ON YOU R’S

]]> By: Bob http://soccerlens.com/chelsea-v-qpr-clash-of-the-titans/5107/#comment-74531 Bob Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:18:02 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/chelsea-v-qpr-clash-of-the-titans/5107/#comment-74531 A possible draw and a good chance for The R's to beat their hated neighbours at Loftus Road perhaps (assuming the likes of Lampard are still out for any possible replay?) As for the two richest teams, it's true, but Loftus Road cant be upgraded so a move out to the suburbs would be on the cards to take them to the next level, infuriating the largely Sheperds Bush-Hammersmith locals who attend every game.... A possible draw and a good chance for The R’s to beat their hated neighbours at Loftus Road perhaps (assuming the likes of Lampard are still out for any possible replay?)

As for the two richest teams, it’s true, but Loftus Road cant be upgraded so a move out to the suburbs would be on the cards to take them to the next level, infuriating the largely Sheperds Bush-Hammersmith locals who attend every game….

]]> By: Anthony http://soccerlens.com/chelsea-v-qpr-clash-of-the-titans/5107/#comment-74502 Anthony Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:32:16 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/chelsea-v-qpr-clash-of-the-titans/5107/#comment-74502 Two richest clubs in the country? I was aware of QPR changing ownership in recent years but I didn't know that. Not to worry anyway, I would rather (of course) watch Man City at West Ham and see if Castillo gets a game, but United at Villa usually brings out their best football. I think it's a bit unfair to say that a Chelsea match ISN'T getting coverage because the top teams are nearly always first even on the highlights programmes. Anyhow, it would be nice to see QPR get something to reinforce the magic of the cup. Grant has done superbly at Chelsea in the slipstream of Mourinho's departure though, and I can't really see Rangers taking anything here. Maybe they could get a replay if the likes of Lampard, Drogba and Terry are out still and the Africans like Essien are gone. Yet my tips for the upsets are at Stoke and possibly Ipswich. I also feel Crystal Palace and Watford will upset the odds because Watford, despite their success this season, just can't seem to win many at home, very weird. Two richest clubs in the country? I was aware of QPR changing ownership in recent years but I didn’t know that.

Not to worry anyway, I would rather (of course) watch Man City at West Ham and see if Castillo gets a game, but United at Villa usually brings out their best football.

I think it’s a bit unfair to say that a Chelsea match ISN’T getting coverage because the top teams are nearly always first even on the highlights programmes.

Anyhow, it would be nice to see QPR get something to reinforce the magic of the cup. Grant has done superbly at Chelsea in the slipstream of Mourinho’s departure though, and I can’t really see Rangers taking anything here. Maybe they could get a replay if the likes of Lampard, Drogba and Terry are out still and the Africans like Essien are gone.

Yet my tips for the upsets are at Stoke and possibly Ipswich. I also feel Crystal Palace and Watford will upset the odds because Watford, despite their success this season, just can’t seem to win many at home, very weird.

]]>