Search Menu

Chelsea player ratings vs Crystal Palace – Torres woeful

Share

Chelsea suffered a shock 1-0 defeat to Crystal Palace at Selhurst Park this afternoon, a defeat that will severely damage their title hopes, with Manchester City now only three points behind, with three games in hand.

matic 234 Chelsea player ratings vs Crystal Palace   Torres woeful

Jose Mourinho’s side had no answer to Palace’s stubborn rearguard throughout the encounter, and when John Terry diverted into his own net just before the hour mark, Chelsea never looked likely to get back into the game, with Tony Pulis’ side having the better chances in the final half an hour.

Here are the Chelsea player ratings:

Subs: Oscar (5), Salah (5), Ba (4)

What do you think? Agree with the ratings? Can Chelsea survive this setback? Get involved in the comments below…

Football Expert? Prove it! Share your knowledge, tips and comments. Win cash prizes - £11,000 monthly! Join OLBG's free-to-enter tipping competition.

Comments (5)

  1. Chelsea suppose to wine 2day game bcs is the one of the opportunity that day have in dis premier league bcs man city still have three outstanding

  2. sack Torres

  3. It is over, chelsea will win champions league

  4. We play woeful nd deserve to loose, first d coach got it al wrong fr fielding weak midfielders. Frm al indicatns u cn see dat deir is no creativity. Matic ws just too poor, we al tot dat he is goin to add something the midfield un4tunately is another waste of money. Bc he is nt given anything, he just like Mikel even slower than Mikel. Torres already know that he is living so no comment. He is just apology. I think Mourinho have to get his own player nd by overhauling

    • I completely agree with Lucky,I didn’t watch d match but from d selection of players,I quickly knew d problem WS d poor collection of uncreative mid fielders like Unautomatic Matic,clueless Luiz n poor Torres, Mourinho should av k own better that people like The above mentioned add little to nothing creatively fr Chelsea’s focus.