Jul
1
2007

Capello pays the price for Real Madrid’s grand legacy

Fabio Capello - Real Madrid

Old habits die hard at Real Madrid, Fabio Capello should be able to attest to that more than most in the footballing world.

The Italian coach was sacked on Thursday by Los Merengues, two weeks after he guided Madrid to their 30th La Liga title in a scenario identical to that of 1997, when Capello was first in charge of the Spanish giants.

It is now getting to the point with Real where the end of the previous season and the lead-up to the new one is about finding out who the next manager is along with identifying which big-name, big-money signing is going to be snapped up by the club.

Capello’s sacking means Real are now looking for their 7th manager in four seasons, after the dismissal of Vicente Del Bosque in June 2003, who also fell on his sword after successfuly guiding Madrid to the league title.

As incredulous as those two examples appear, spare a thought for Jupp Heynckes, who was given his marching orders by the club in 1998, shortly after he had led Real to their first European Cup victory in 32 years. With this in mind, it’s hard to imagine how Capello even stood a chance of keeping his job, with only a paltry La Liga title to his name in his first season back in the Spanish capital.

Many reasons were given for the sacking of Capello from media outlets in the aftermath, but the official line lies with Predrag Mijatovic, Real’s sporting director, who explained that the club needed “a more enthusiastic style of play.” Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but weren’t Real Madrid looking for a coach that could produce results at the beginning of the season just gone, after 4 years of mediocrity?

In fact, wasn’t it Capello himself who told the media at the start of his tenure that now “It’s all about getting results”? So why wasn’t there uproar in the boardroom then about this, what suddenly changed in 9 months for this decision to be taken by Real? Suddenly the vicious circle that is the head coach’s job at Madrid becomes all too apparent.

The loss of David Beckham to the L.A. Galaxy was also another reason given by experts as to why Capello was shown the door. Again there is the lingering feeling of hypocrisy surrounding this subject.

It was Calderon himself who supported Capello’s verbal attack on Beckham, going one step further in predicting that Beckham would become an “average cinema actor in Hollywood.” But as soon as Capello realised the error of his ways and reinstated Beckham to the team, Calderon ensured he got in on the act as well and publicly supported the former England skipper.

There’s no denying the fact that Capello made mistakes during his reign, one glaring error being his reaction to Beckham’s announcement of his departure from Spain along with the treatment of others within the squad. But Calderon’s subsequent U-turn was facetious as he looked out for his own best interests.

Whatever keeps the fans happy keeps Calderon in power, and if that meant going back on his word with nothing more than a half-hearted withdrawal of his statement and a public undermining of the authority of the manager, then so be it.

The real truth in the matter lies in the past however. In some respects, what we see at the Bernebeau in the modern era, with the conveyor belt of managers and ruthless disposal of those who do not conform to the Madrid way of playing, stems from half a decade ago. The Real Madrid team of the 1950’s were the definition of a dream team. In the same elite group as Brazil’s 1970 squad, Ajax’s Total Football outfit, Hungary’s Magic Magyars and the Milan side of the 90’s.

For a football purist, the names read like a who’s who of football. Di Stefano, Puskas, Gento, Kopa and Munoz, to name but some of the supergroup that claimed the first five European Cups and played with an attacking verve that defines Real Madrid. Elder fans remember those days with reverance, the new generations grow up on tales of the side that won 7-3 in the 1960 epic at Hampden Park, and as such, they crave success on the same level.

The simple fact of the matter though is that in this day and age, glory on that scale is nigh on impossible, such is the level of competition at home and abroad for Real. Many try, and many fail in pursuit of what has been achieved in years gone by, and Capello is just another victim of the past. The press can speculate all they like about the reasons behind the decision to fire Capello, but the real reason behind his sacking, and those who have gone before him, is that they are all victims of a bygone time, and an audience who feel that only dominance on that scale is enough to satisfy the legends from before.

In truth, Real, Calderon and the millions of fans are chasing a pipe dream and when they are unable to achieve to the desired level, the buck stops with the manager.

So where does this leave Real? Bernd Schuster is the man almost certainly entrusted with becoming the next to chase the impossible goal, although the likes of Arsene Wenger, Rafael Benitez and Jose Mourinho have also been mentioned as the Spaniards look for Capello’s replacement.

How long do I give him? If he’s lucky, he’ll see out the season. If he stumbles, we’ll be having more articles like this in and around Christmas. Assuming that Schuster will indeed take up the helm, he will need to accept the perils of the job he is taking up, and that without success, major success, he will be on his way out before he has time to make a serious impact. You fear that he will end up falling on his sword much in the same way that Capello has in the last few days, simply because of the sheer scale of expectation that comes with Real Madrid.

To sack a manager in the immediate aftermath of a title success and a first trophy in four years smacks of folly and distrust. But in the cauldron that is Real Madrid, with the past hanging over the club, preventing against the stability and unity that any team desires, this is nothing out of the ordinary.

The shame about this for Madrid is that after the relative progress that has been this season, they now find themselves back at square one after a relatively pointless dismissal. The discrepancies developed in the Lorenzo Sanz era, continued during Florentino Perez’s reign and now existing in Ramon Calderon’s presidency of Los Merengues continue to hold a club back where the potential for success is so enormous.

If anyone could move on from the past and allow sanity to break out for a minute, then the sky’s the limit for a unified Real Madrid team.

Related Items from Soccerlens

| Subscribe via RSS


Discussion - 8 Responses

  1. your article is correct to a certain extend but remember that capello left on his own accord after winning la liga in 1997. the main reason that capello was fired apart from the fact that he probably didn’t get along with calderon was his style of football. madrid like barca has a reputation for playing the beautiful football and just like brazil winning is not enuff. you have 2 play the beautiful football. calderon wanted schuster in the first place and i think that schuster will make madrid play better football. true they might not win everything but they will win something because to me a real team is being built and as it seems money is no object for them they will get the best palyer. it won’t be the galactico but just like frank rijkard did with barca a young and exiceting coach like schuster will do to madrid. the style of capello works in places like italy were he has won everything but what has he won in europe since the CL with milan. the problem with keeping capello would have been that if he was not able to win big next season it will have been calderon and pedja job on the line. capello won the league this year more by default than anything. barca didn’t perform and sevilla stumble maybe due 2 lack of experience. with the way barca is building ,valencia, sevilla etc… it will have been very diffucult for capello to win with his style of play. just look at english premier league man u won by playing the best football despite chelsea defensive approach which worked for only so long. once the other team figure u out then since u do not have the creative juice or player that xcan make the different then u lost. that why liverpool might win the cl(a lottery) but will struggle to win the premiership with thier style cuz they lack the creative player. as a whole capello was lucky and being a huge real fan i will be the first 2 admit that they will always fired the coach to cover thier failures but capello firing was the right thing for the future of the team. remember if capello has stayed real will probably have been the oldest team in the league cuz capello like old player which whilst is good foe experience in a long season if you have 2 much player over 30 years then u bound 2 suffer. real will be good next year as will be barca mark my words.

  2. July 1, 2007kyle-aussieGunner

    No matter who Madrid get as coach, no matter how well the manager does, he will get sacked, Capello did a good job and got Madrid’s first big for 3 or so years

  3. What’s the point of Beautiful football is you lose???

  4. Eugene Quinn:

    I like your article but several things around.

    1. Fabio Capello left on his own in 97
    2. He was brought here to win a throphy and he did, this was done to put the ghost of not winning anything in 3 years to rest.
    3. Ramon Calderon never wanted Fabio Capello but Schuster, Mijatovic convinced him to use Capello.

    5. Real Madrid were EXTREMELY lucky to the Spanish league, evena a Real Madrid supporter say this. Fabio Capello has not won the league convincingly but because of Barcelona’s sudden dip in form. We relied on last minutes goals to keep us in the race and so on. You make it seem as if Fabio Capello won the league convincingly which isn’t the case at all, at best he was luck.

    6. You say that the fans are chasing is a pipe dream? .. What the fans along with Calderon want is beautiful football, the kind the club was playing just 7-8 years ago when they were winning the Champions League.

  5. July 1, 2007iqnadirshah

    Its ridiculous that these sort of foolish reasonings, overinflated expectations and the search for the proverbial scapegoats rule in the boardrooms of one the biggest clubs in the football world. Its even more ridiculous that there are sane people supporting such actions………..

  6. July 2, 2007King Zizou

    Nice article mate.
    @Redondo - I admit Real were lucky to a certain extent but to call them extremely lucky, and to say that Real won the league solely on luck is not correct. They played better than Barca in almost all the big matches I can think of and most importantly they played well against Barca themselves, which is what mattered most in the end. Barca on the other hand were very inconsistent. Also, Capello was not all lucky winning the league, he did so many things right - correct substitutions, promoted young players (Torres was awesome!), he bought well in the transfer market, etc. Yes, I admit he had his drawbacks - negative style of play, arguments with Ronaldo, Beckham etc. I would also not be not be very displeased to c him gone, but to say that he or Real were lucky is not appropriate.

  7. Great article.
    I just can’t udnerstand how people - even their own supporters - can say Real was lucky to win. The league does not get won in one game, but over about 38 games. Was he that lucky? 38 times?

  8. Real Madrid weren´t lucky to win, Barcelona were lucky to still have a chance come May. The same people who are so quick to point out that Madrid had several come from behind victories in the final matches while Barcelona dropped some points are also quick to forget that in the first half of the season Madrid had its worst ever home record and dropped 17 points in the Bernabeu.

Add Your Comment


Comments are moderated (our comments policy).



Partners

Euro 2008 Tickets free bets
Advertise here

Subscribe


Add to my Widsets

Subscribe via RSS


Get Soccerlens via Email


Have Your Say:

Latest Articles

Hot Topics

Get Started

Pages

Network Headlines

Partners