Comments on: Are Chelsea Even Contenders Anymore? http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/ Football News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:17:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Jeremy http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61524 Jeremy Mon, 01 Oct 2007 04:24:37 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61524 they are still now they are still now

]]> By: Strikarz http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61449 Strikarz Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:09:47 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61449 ah well, maybe I was wrong - Shevchenko played like a spanner yesterday. I thought with Mourinho gone then it would allow him to rise above and show his class... maybe he still will, but when his own 'fans' are booing him then I doubt he'll ever get his confidence back. No doubt these are the same arse holes who boo any England player who isn't part of the 'established' clique when they first break into the team. ah well, maybe I was wrong – Shevchenko played like a spanner yesterday. I thought with Mourinho gone then it would allow him to rise above and show his class… maybe he still will, but when his own ‘fans’ are booing him then I doubt he’ll ever get his confidence back. No doubt these are the same arse holes who boo any England player who isn’t part of the ‘established’ clique when they first break into the team.

]]> By: Adam http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61387 Adam Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:00:47 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61387 They're either contenders or they're not going to win it; it can't be both. If you're predicting that they're going to finish third, you're discounting Chelsea as title contenders. The conclusion to your article makes no sense based on your arguments. They’re either contenders or they’re not going to win it; it can’t be both. If you’re predicting that they’re going to finish third, you’re discounting Chelsea as title contenders. The conclusion to your article makes no sense based on your arguments.

]]> By: dan un-official liaison http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61386 dan un-official liaison Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:54:49 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61386 after today im thinking chelsea 4th/5th, if spurs lose tomorow, im thinking city have a strong chance of 4th, but be weary of everton to. lowest chelsea could fall is 6th. after today im thinking chelsea 4th/5th, if spurs lose tomorow, im thinking city have a strong chance of 4th, but be weary of everton to. lowest chelsea could fall is 6th.

]]> By: Strikarz http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61322 Strikarz Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:04:11 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61322 They're still contenders in my opinion. I feel strangely optimistic about Avram Grant's ability to manage Chelsea... I even think he might make a better job of it this season than Mourinho would've, because I think he'll get more about of Shevchenko & Ballack. They’re still contenders in my opinion.

I feel strangely optimistic about Avram Grant’s ability to manage Chelsea… I even think he might make a better job of it this season than Mourinho would’ve, because I think he’ll get more about of Shevchenko & Ballack.

]]> By: Boom! Gunners! http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61251 Boom! Gunners! Sat, 29 Sep 2007 03:54:49 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61251 Fourth for Chelska. Arsenal #1 ManU #2 Pool #3. Fourth for Chelska. Arsenal #1 ManU #2 Pool #3.

]]> By: Warri Gooner http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61204 Warri Gooner Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:46:57 +0000 http://soccerlens.com/are-chelsea-even-contenders-anymore/3319/#comment-61204 You are spot on mate. You are spot on mate.

]]>