<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it easier to win the Euro or the World Cup?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soccerlens.com/7992/7992/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soccerlens.com/7992/7992/</link>
	<description>Soccerlens - Football News You Can Trust</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:26:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://soccerlens.com/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JoÃ£o</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/7992/7992/comment-page-1/#comment-93994</link>
		<dc:creator>JoÃ£o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/7992/7992/#comment-93994</guid>
		<description>i really thing you should separate the competitions, not in two, but in three different ones.
1) European Championship
2) World Cup (in Europe)
3) World Cup (not in Europe)
it&#039;s not a coincidence that there has never been a Wold Cup winner coming from Europe when the event takes place either in America (North or South) or Asia. So being, it&#039;s not only a matter of different types of football being played, but also a matter of different enviroments.

THE HARDEST - winning a World Cup held in South America/North America/Africa/Asia - it has never been done
THE SECOND HARDEST - i really think that winning a European Championship and a World Cup (held in Europe), is equaly as hard. I really can&#039;t decide if one is harder than the other.

why the Euro might be harder:
- there&#039;s a higher percentage of good teams than in the world cup.

why the WC (held in Europe) might be harder:
- you have to adapt to playing againts non-european styles of playing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i really thing you should separate the competitions, not in two, but in three different ones.<br />
1) European Championship<br />
2) World Cup (in Europe)<br />
3) World Cup (not in Europe)<br />
it&#8217;s not a coincidence that there has never been a Wold Cup winner coming from Europe when the event takes place either in America (North or South) or Asia. So being, it&#8217;s not only a matter of different types of football being played, but also a matter of different enviroments.</p>
<p>THE HARDEST &#8211; winning a World Cup held in South America/North America/Africa/Asia &#8211; it has never been done<br />
THE SECOND HARDEST &#8211; i really think that winning a European Championship and a World Cup (held in Europe), is equaly as hard. I really can&#8217;t decide if one is harder than the other.</p>
<p>why the Euro might be harder:<br />
- there&#8217;s a higher percentage of good teams than in the world cup.</p>
<p>why the WC (held in Europe) might be harder:<br />
- you have to adapt to playing againts non-european styles of playing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naruto</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/7992/7992/comment-page-1/#comment-93901</link>
		<dc:creator>naruto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/7992/7992/#comment-93901</guid>
		<description>the world cup is much harder then the euro you just dont know what to expect, it shows players from all over the world and lets take last world cup for example italy only went through against australia because of a bad descion giving a penalty which was cleraly a dive then italy went to win the world cup and who held the italians, u.s.a a non-europe team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the world cup is much harder then the euro you just dont know what to expect, it shows players from all over the world and lets take last world cup for example italy only went through against australia because of a bad descion giving a penalty which was cleraly a dive then italy went to win the world cup and who held the italians, u.s.a a non-europe team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuzzy</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/7992/7992/comment-page-1/#comment-93892</link>
		<dc:creator>fuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/7992/7992/#comment-93892</guid>
		<description>&quot;And, on top of that three different European nations have won three of the past four World Cups.&quot;

2006 - Italy
2002 - Brazil
1998 - France
1994 - Brazil

Brazil == Europe :-D

Seriously speaking, in my opinion -
Quality wise - EURO
Passion level - World Cup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And, on top of that three different European nations have won three of the past four World Cups.&#8221;</p>
<p>2006 &#8211; Italy<br />
2002 &#8211; Brazil<br />
1998 &#8211; France<br />
1994 &#8211; Brazil</p>
<p>Brazil == Europe <img src='http://soccerlens.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously speaking, in my opinion -<br />
Quality wise &#8211; EURO<br />
Passion level &#8211; World Cup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: England Fan</title>
		<link>http://soccerlens.com/7992/7992/comment-page-1/#comment-93887</link>
		<dc:creator>England Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soccerlens.com/7992/7992/#comment-93887</guid>
		<description>Does the fact that England have won the world Cup and not the Euros help the arguement?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the fact that England have won the world Cup and not the Euros help the arguement?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
