Comments on: £70m? £120m? How much will Man City Buy Kaka for?

By: erwf

erwf — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:25:26 +0000

Man City > Spurs

I’m sorry, whos currently in 18th place 2 points away from the bottom?

By: Blend

Blend — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:52:48 +0000

A wee bit jealous are we Bif Spur? It really is pathetic you know!

By: Big Spur

Big Spur — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:39:36 +0000

P.S. Milan going down hill Ryan?
Just the success cycle. When a no bit side like Man C have won the european silverware that Milan have then i may think again. I am fed up with all this incessant nonsense about whos going to Eastlands, no BIG player who thrives for success is going there. Just players with insufferable greed for cash and a peverse attraction to being underwhelmed!!

By: Big Spur

Big Spur — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:34:39 +0000

Um, get real folks.
Robinho signed for Man C then forgot who he had signed for in interview and quoted Chelsea. Real wanted rid anyway. If people really believe World class players are going to sign for a side flirting with relegation and not even a BIG english club then they need professional help. Do you really think KAKA is going to swap a monolith like Milan for a soon to be championship side ??!!

By: Real_4life

Real_4life — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:52:35 +0000

Â£70-100 million

By: Ryan

Ryan — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:36:41 +0000

Kaka not only is a great player (he is of course NOT the best, but like top 5 players in the world) he also is a great source of income for the team. Having Kaka on your team would drive the fan support through the roof and his jersey would sell like crazy across the world. It would honestly be a win win win situation. Man City would win because that bought Kaka, the fans win because they now have Kaka on their team, Kaka even wins too because i am sure Man City will pay double Milan and Milan is slowly going down hill with their players and their stature. The 100 mill could be easily spent elsewhere to increase the overall status of the team. Maybe bring in some actually youth players besides Pato. The only problem would be that Kaka may just not want to move from Milan to England just yet. The minimum price for Kaka would easily be 120 mill. Considering if Ronaldo has been linked with over a 150 mill move….Kaka is about a good 20 to 30 mill less than him.

By: Blend

Blend — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:38:51 +0000

Kaka is not only the best player in the world, he is also a consumate proffessional. I don’t think we could spend the money on a better player if we tried. He is not a billy big balls ‘galactico’ and that is how I like it.

He also wouldn’t be the only player to come in. I’m pretty sure a centre back and a couple of DMC’s are on the priority list too.

By: Morgan (Arsenal fan)

Morgan (Arsenal fan) — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:09:08 +0000

What are man city thinking of? All they need at the moment is more defensive players. If the want stars go after players like, Ramos, Xavi, Canavaro, Nesta, Chivu, Mexes, Senna, Walter Samuel, Philipp Lahm, Willy Sagnol, Joan Capdevila, RaÃºl Albiol, Carlos Marchena, Carles Puyol, Gabriel Milito, Kolo Toure, Yaya Toure, Miguel Veloso, Matthew Upson, Vidic, Can anyone else think of some players for Man city to buy? I would buy Iniesta over Kaka anyway.

By: RT Wilcock

RT Wilcock — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:45:47 +0000

I cant see him leaving for anything less than Â£100 Million. I think he’ll go but AC Milan are seriously going to drive the price up until Man City give. It’ll be a Berbatov all over again!