Apr
8
2008

6 Reasons why moving to Asia is the best thing to ever happen in Australian football

Written by Shane Perris. Tagged: Features - International

Australia versus China

Until the 2010 qualifying series, Australia’s road to the World Cup was a twisted, teasing and torturous one. Stuck in a Confederation with only one credible opponent and too far away for anyone else to fly out for friendlies, Australia would dominate its neighbours and be forced to play the also-rans of a stronger Confederation, with Australia knocked by far flung teams such as Scotland, Israel and more recently, Uruguay.

In 2006 FIFA and the Asian Football Confederation agreed to allow Australia to join with Asia following the 2006 World Cup. Australia was faced with a longer qualifying period as well as regular competition with higher ranked teams who had experienced success in previous World Cups (such as South Korea and Japan). It could be argued that qualification for the World Cup is harder than ever before, even if the team now has the chance to win one of 4.5 slots in Asia instead of 0.5 slots in Oceania (5th placed in Asia will play the winner of Oceania, most likely to be New Zealand). Even if the competition is too strong and Australia does not qualify in 2010, there are 6 very good reasons why moving into the Asian Football Confederation is the best thing to ever happen to Australian football:

1. The Asia Cup

Played every 4 years and alternating with the World Cup, the Asia Cup gives the Australian team something to do to keep them sharp between World Cup campaigns. While it can be difficult to get international players to return from Europe for qualifiers, the Cup gives plenty of international opportunities for players in the A-League to press their claims for regular international selection.

2. A larger stage

With member countries including China and India, the Asian Football Confederation provides a potential audience for Australian football rivaled only by the World Cup itself. Which would you prefer - playing in packed Tuodong or Seoul World Cup stadiums, or Blatter Stadium, Samoa? The larger television audience also provides greater sponsorship opportunities for individual players, domestic teams and the Socceroos.

3. Better competition

Australia holds the world record for inflicting the largest defeat with a 31-0 humiliation of the American Samoa in the 2002 qualifying series. In the 2006 round of games, the Socceroos were undefeated from 5 games with a 21-3 record against Pacific heavyweights like Vanuatu, Tahiti and the Solomon Islands (who to their credit finished ahead of New Zealand and played off against Australia for the right to beat Uruguay and qualify for 2006). Contrast this with the recent 3-0 defeat of Qatar and a grinding 0-0 draw against China with a squad ravaged by injury. The 3 highest ranked countries from Australia’s Group in 2006 were New Zealand (91), Solomon Islands (123) and Vanuatu (141). Australia (38) is currently pitting its wits against Iraq (68 and winner of the 2008 Asia Cup), China (80) and Qatar (99). It doesn’t take a genius to work out which is the better preparation for a World Cup.

4. Foreign-based players take games more seriously

The Club vs Country debate has long been a bitter one in Australian football. Many European clubs have been reluctant to release players to fly 30+ hours half way around the world for a mid-week game and then have them fly 30+ hours back and be recovered in time for the club game on the weekend. Add to the that the risk of injury and its not hard to see why clubs would rather the players didn’t travel. Players have also been reluctant to push the issue - who wants to risk first team selection for the sake of an Australia - Fiji game? Now that they are playing in Asia and the stakes are higher, more of the foreign-based Socceroos are prepared to risk the fury of their club coach and insist they be released for international duty. Players nursing niggling injuries are still unlikely to travel though due to the risk of the long plane flights making something worse. Some coaches are still unwilling to come to the party. However, for every manager like Celtic’s Gordon Strachan lying about an injury to striker Scott McDonald, there’s a Rafa encouraging an out-of-form Harry Kewell to play for his country to get some much needed time on the ball.

5. Asian Champions League

The domestic competition might be improving every year but new Socceroo coach Pim Verbeek was right when he said squad training with a Bundesliga team was still better than being out on the park every week in the A -League. The Asian Champions League provides local players with some desperately needed international experience against different styles of play in different conditions. It gives the best teams each season the chance to play out of their comfort zone. Without this opportunity, the best a local player could hope for is another lacklustre encounter with a woeful New Zealand club team in wet and miserable Wellington.

6. More football for everyone

The Asia Cup. The Asian Champions League. Longer qualification process. Higher profile in Asia and globally. All of these add up to more football being played by the Socceroos and Australian players. The Socceroos win because they keep their match fitness and are able to develop and play together as a squad. Australian football wins because we have a better chance of consistently qualifying for the World Cup (the ultimate prize!). The players win because they are testing themselves against a better quality opposition playing styles of football radically different to what they are used to. The biggest winners of all are us - the fans.

We have more world class football to watch than ever before, and in the end, isn’t that what we all want?

Related Items from Soccerlens

| Subscribe via RSS


Discussion - 5 Responses

  1. Erik touched on this in his article on the USMNT as well - by playing tougher opposition the team has a better chance of success in the long run.

  2. April 9, 2008KyleAusGooner

    Your an aussie too huh?

    Nice article man, Some good points and I too defintly reckon that AFC qualification is that much better than the old Oceania way - I think we can look forward to an easy-ish road to the 2010 World Cup.

    Another thing to add is that our hopes of hosting WC 2018 could be boosted after Thailand (I think it is..) are apperently having second thoughts on hosting the Aisan Cup in 2011 because of the amount of money on stadia being more than first thought - we are in the driving seat to be announced the hosts for thr 2011 tournament should it be shifted, that could very well help us show (As with the 2000 Sydney olympics, 2003 Rugby world Cup and 2006 Melbourne commenwealth games) we CAN host an event like the 2018 World Cup.

    ‘done mate….

  3. @Ahmed: absolutely. Without regular tough competition, the team gets lazy and will get spanked when it plays someone of higher quality. I’m prepared to take the occasional dent to the national pride in the interests of long-term improvement in our game.

    @Kyle: I think 2018 is too early and I’m not convinced there are enough WC quality grounds in Australia. Yet. In time there will be. I do think that the Asia Cup is within our reach now and we should go for it at the first opportunity. What little I saw of the Asia Cup on TV looked like some damn fine football to me. I would love to see some more of that live in action.

    The road to 2010 isn’t as easy as the local media is trying to make it out to be. We should make it but I don’t think it is a sure bet yet.

  4. Also, the TV revenue generated by playing teams like Japan, Korea and China, and in the ACL can be reinvested in Australian football, building a coaching system and even doing the MLS/NASL thing of tempting good but past-it players to Oz to increase coverage/interest.

    If the A-League and the Australian FA play this right it could easily become a decent league in 4-5 years. It’ll be interesting to see whether the A-League or the MLS is seen as ‘better’ in a few years.

  5. Michael, moving into Asia has already paid off in TV rights terms. As soon as the A-League settled in and it was clear Australia was going to be in Asia long-term, Foxtel bought the TV rights to almost all Australian pro football for $120m over 7 years. That’s unheard of for Australian football and I think the only TV rights that compare with that are the AFL.

    Money flowing into the game means a better game all round.

    I don’t think the A-League will ever be better than a ‘feeder’ league blooding stars for future glory in Europe. What it should do is stop our teenagers going off to Europe at 15 or 16 (like Harry Kewell) when they can develop their game for a few more years domestically and venture out in their early 20s with some more experience and proven record under their belt. That in turn will do wonders for the Joeys (U19) and the Olyroos.

Add Your Comment


Comments are moderated (our comments policy).



Partners

Euro 2008 Tickets
Advertise here

Subscribe


Add to my Widsets

Subscribe via RSS


Get Soccerlens via Email


Have Your Say:

Latest Articles

Hot Topics

Get Started

Pages

Network Headlines

Partners