10 Rules to Being England’s Manager
It’s all over. After 18 matches, 1620 minutes of football and 457 days of management, Steve McClaren has been hounded out of his cushty job as England manager, and he’s taking a fancy paycheck with him. Did he need more guidance? Maybe. A leaflet or something with some basic pointers should have covered it.
All through his time as coach, he has had his doubters, but there were plenty more to back him up. The Director of Football Management, Sir Trevor Brooking for one, one of the most revered managers in Britain, Sir Alex Ferguson was another. Heck, even eternal pessimist Alan Hansen thought it was a good appointment. Mind you, he is Scottish.
Though let’s look where we started the ‘McClaren rollercoaster’, all the way back on the 16th August 2006, in a friendly match against EURO 2004 winners – Greece. Things looked good – John Terry, Frank Lampard and a Peter Crouch double before half-time was fantastic, Stewart Downing gave an inspired performance which was strangely overlooked by the media, and all without Michael Owen or Wayne Rooney. Even without David Beckham.
And then our first qualifier – a 5-0 thumping of Andorra, despite the fact that Wes Brown and Phil Neville played! Paul Robinson kept a clean sheet, Crouch and Defoe both got a double, and Stevie G justified his role on the right wing with a goal. What could go wrong? Well, leaving Phil Neville in the team for longer than necessary probably didn’t help, but we did manage a thrid successive victory – a lone Peter Crouch goal giving us a 1-0 win away to Macedonia.
But then, all of a sudden… we cocked-up. And you can pinpoint it directly to the ego’s of two Manchester United players – Gary Neville and Wayne Rooney. They returned for the home tie with Macedonia, and did abdolutely naff all. And this unusual curse of Manchester United players continued as Gary Neville, Rio Ferdinand, Michael Carrick, Kieran Richardson and Wayne Rooney all played some part in the shambolic loss to Croatia, in which Robinson conceded that goal. Mind, the situation probably wasn’t helped by the wacky and wonderful 5-3-2 we employed for that match.
A 1-1 friendly draw away to Holland was alright – they’re a good team, and then… well… A 1-0 loss to Spain wasn’t great – poor preparation for the upcoming qualifier, but it was a weak team, including Ben Foster, both the Neville’s, and a 4-5-1 formation with no left winger, despite Downing being fit and on form.
The confidence (or lack of) showed in the match against Israel. Phil Neville retained his place, Carra was once again played out of position, and Macca decided we didn’t need a left winger, and we suffered – 0-0. It was all change for the Andorra match, a game we couldn’t lose with the fans well and truly on McClaren’s back, and all of a sudden, he had a plan. No Neville’s, two strikers, a left winger and three goals. Can’t argue with that.
It didn’t last long. Beckham was brought back. That Gerrard-Lamps problem was back. Alan Smith was back, and Joe Cole was back despite doing naff all. A 1-1 draw with Brazil to christen the new Wembley ensued, which at least steadied his job.
Sandwiching in a demoralising 2-1 defeat to the old enemy, between two inexplicable 3-0 wins against Estonia and Israel,we were back on form. Plus the emergence of Gareth Barry as a talented player, and then bringing Heskey back in the squad we beat Russia 3-0, and qualification looked sorted. Tactical genius from McClaren? Well, no probably not. He just struck lucky with everyone else being injured.
Cue the plastic pitch, everything seemingly going wrong, and McClaren losing it. Again. Sol and Lescott were poor, Owen and Rooney didn’t work, Joe Cole played AGAIN (although the late cameo from Downing offered more than Cole had in 80 minutes), and there was even time for the kiss of death – Gerrard and Lampard alongside each other.
How to save it? Our hopes lay on Israel as we struggled to a pointless 1-0 win in Austria, losing our best striker.
But everything would be fine. McClaren had a brainwave! 4-5-1 was the way forward! It didn’t matter than we hadn’t won with that formation since the 70′s, this must-win qualifier was the game to try it. Along with the totally untested Carson, despite Robinson being one of the best keepers in the tournament so far. And lets be honest, they were all dire, bar perhaps Peter Crouch and David Beckham, who produced our only moment of attacking magic. Oddly enough, this was the first game in which no Manchester United players featured.
Cue his sacking. He had 18 matches, and won only 9 of them. You can blame the players till the cows come home, but once you’ve learnt that something doesn’t work, you shouldn’t try it again.
I mentioned a leaflet that should come with the England job. I think whoever takes it should remember these 10 points, and they’ll head their way to success.
- Don’t replace one of the best keepers in the tournament with a total unknown in a must win, high-stakes game.
- Don’t play defenders with no experience (Lescott) alongside someone who can’t run (Sol). Especially when people like Woodgate or Richards could have played there instead.
- Never, ever, EVER, play Wes Brown or Wayne Bridge. Both wish to grant the opposition gilt edged chances to score.
- Left-wingers are important. It helps if they have experience of playing on the left, can use their left foot, and can cross the ball.
- Right-wingers should also be able to cross the ball.
- Gerrard+Lampard doesn’t add up, no matter how many times you try it.
- Neither does a 4-5-1 system. Or a 5-3-2 system.
- Nor does Owen and Rooney upfront. We need a target man.
- It’s fine playing Crouch as a target man, but you need people who can kick the ball to him, or latch onto his knockdowns. All 5 midfielders failed to do that against Croatia.
- If you’re ginger, balding, wear glasses, and have a poor record in management, don’t take the England job. That’s just fuelling the fire.
Topics: England, Help Football, Managers, Steve McClaren



Football News 24/7
TomSharp, you have been appointed manager, c’mon you couldn’t have done any worse than fu**in’ McClaren…
Really, it was a stupid idea appointing him anyway, after all he was manager of Boro and was not the greatest they have had either, I think somebody like Gerard Houllier or something should have been appointed, or that guy who was at Chelsea, before Grant before Mourniho (mental blank!)
Well, it was bound to happen..
November 23rd, 2007 @ 09:22u mean ranieri? he’s at juve!
November 23rd, 2007 @ 09:42If the England team is really this high maintenance, isn’t time we just faced the fact that they’re nowhere near as good as we all like to think they are?
Here’s another little pointer for England to go along with the last of your 10 points: “If you’re ginger, just beginning to bald, at the end of your career and yet still England’s best midfielder; come back, we need you!”
November 23rd, 2007 @ 09:46Do people realise that Maclaren will get 2 million quid compensation for being sacked? After wasting a load of money with Sven’s sacking, are the FA so stupid as not to include a clause in the contract to say “we reserve the right to terminate the contract without compensation for failure to qualify for a major tournament”. Why is it the people at the top are still there?
November 23rd, 2007 @ 10:48Id like to see:
Robinson
Richards Ferdinand Terry A. Cole
Gerrard Hargreaves J Cole Barry
Rooney Walcott
We’d play this as a fairly flat 4-4-2 with a bit of a diamond going on as J Cole has license to push forward while Hargreaves holds. We’d play penetrating through balls
November 23rd, 2007 @ 13:04that Walcott and Rooney can run onto.
Well it might have cost the FA £2m to get rid of him, but thats nothing compared to the estimated £5m that they will loose for us not qualifying. I’m gutted, but not surprised.
November 23rd, 2007 @ 17:43Fault of united players?? You sir are a hypocrit..Tsk tsk
November 23rd, 2007 @ 17:57Fault of united players?? You sir, are a hypocrit..Tsk tsk
November 23rd, 2007 @ 17:57I am a hypocrite? I struggle to see how I am a hypocrite from that. I admit that was a random point for me to include, but sadly, there is no correlation between the number of United players involved and Englands results, so that rant hasn’t got off the ground.
However, I do believe the introduction of Neville and Rooney in that game was a poor decision, as was any inclusion of Wes Brown.
KyleAusGooner – To be honest, anyone with a backbone to make good decisions, regardless of the ego’s of any players would do better than McClaren. Personally, I’d love the job, nothing would fill me with more pride – something McClaren crucially lacked.
And Ian – I refer you to this article. It may well have been written mildly sarcasticly, but I feel that there were elements of truth, and I don’t doubt that he ensured he would receive a healthy pay-off in the event of his sacking.
November 23rd, 2007 @ 19:48Tom you got your head up your ass. You must hate United players. Anyways they should go for less ego and younger players so they can get some games together and adapt as a team.
Foster/Robinson
Richards Ferdinand Terry Cole
Bentley Gerrard Barry/Hargreaves Cole/Young
Rooney Agbonlahor
Bench:
Crouch, Lennon, Walcott
November 23rd, 2007 @ 20:42Why play Gerrard + Lampard when Gerrard + Barry was working .. Hargreaves was fit(finally !) but didn’t play .. Steve Mclaren was in Germany with Sven when Hargreaves had an awesome tournament .. I haven’t seen a more stupid coach than this guy .. 2-2 with Croatia on the backfoot & he asks the team to go into a defensive mode .. Wayne Bridge was having a terrible match & his fit senior(Cole) is sitting out
November 23rd, 2007 @ 23:50PS – tomsharp, did you see any Man United player on the playing field in the match vs Croatia ?
good points but i’d disagree with a few
1. we need to be tactically versatile. playing 4-5-1 and 5-3-2 wasn’t the problem, it was the fact that the players clearly hadn’t trained together in those systems for more than a day and mcclaren clearly didn’t give them much instruction.
2. we shouldn’t NEED a target man. thinking that we do is part of the problem. they’re undoubtedly useful, and crouch has been great there, but our two best strikers are midgets, and it looks as if all the young talent up front is tiny too.
3. gerrard and lampard played pretty well together in 2004. gerrard is perfectly capable of playing on the right wing if he really has to be in the team, and someone like hargreaves can let lampard do his scavenging-around-the-penalty-area and working-hard-for-glory chelsea thing.
essentaiully we need a manager who’ll work out the best system for our players, no matter how strange and unconventional it looks in a sky sports graphic. look how well argentina have been doing with 4-2-1-3…and their three are all strikers, not two wingers and a diet drogba.
we clearly do have some great players capable of great things, but maybe some are overrated and others are undervalued. robinson’s not that bad. hargreaves deserves to start every game for england, based on 2006 alone. lampard can be fantastic, gerrard shouldn’t be vice captain, carragher is an arsehole for retiring.
phew. thats over. anyway, nice post.
November 24th, 2007 @ 00:08fuzzy – No, I didn’t see any United players. Hence ruining all hopes of a ‘Its all Man Utd’s fault’. Sadly.
michael – Our best two strikers might be midgets, but I don’t think it works together. Its up to them to prove me wrong (if they’re ever fit!), but it failed to do the business in Russia for me. They both like to sit behind someone (Crouch, Heskey or Ashton), and so alongside each other, they just sit back and let the defence do their thing.
Gerrard… Well, he can play on the right, but he doesn’t suit it. And anyway, I’m becoming impressed by the whole SWP-Richards partnership forming out there.
November 24th, 2007 @ 01:17Tom, I usually enjoy reading your articles, especially the one about McLaren getting sacked. That was class, this is just aimless ranting. Sorry. NB this opinion might have been formed by you attacks on Man Utd players
1.I do not see what your point is about Wes Brown, he is doing just fine for Man Utd. Just because Richards is better does not mean that Brown is rubbish;
2.Lay off Gary Neville!!! The guy is awesome! Yes, he may not be loved outside Old Trafford, but everyone has to appreciate the quality which he brings into a team. He will not be able to replace a brilliant Richards, but still… we cannot blame him for much. It is no wonder England players have no heart. Not after they are thrashed like this for very little reason;
3.Somebody mentioned Gerrard and Lampard played well in 2004. I think Scholes might have had something to do with it, but letting Lampard take care of issues in attack and Gerrard of the defensive part, we should be alright. Remeber that nobody could see Tevez and Rooney play well together…
4.We do not need a target man. Real Madird do not have one, neither does Milan or Barcelona. Man Utd, Roma and Lyon are also doing just fine without one. A quality team does not need to launch balls to the big man, it needs good build-up play. BRING SCHOLES BACK!! I am not going to say that England have he quality to beat any of the afrementioned teams, because they do not, but that should be the target if we want to win anything this century;
5.Cole is useless on that flank for England, but SWP can/could do a good job. He combines well with Richards and as long as the coach lets him do his think in peace and maybe gies him some tactical indications he could be brilliant. Better than Rooney? No. Mourinho was wrong.
That is about all I have to say.
November 24th, 2007 @ 03:55Here is what i think about beckham in england future.. Beckham can play a few more matches untill about 120caps? then he retires from playing??Finally.. Become the manager of england?? thats cool..
November 24th, 2007 @ 04:42And here is my WC 2010 view of the line up..
4-4-2:GK-Carson or Foster(both could be better by then)
LB-A.Cole
CB-Terry
CB-Ferdinand(hopes he doesnt retire),Richards
RB-Bridge
CDM-Hargreaves
ML-J.Cole
MR-Gerrard
CAM-Lampard
ST-Rooney
ST-Walcott(I’m not really sure..)
Tactics: FreeKick-Gerrard
November 24th, 2007 @ 04:51Penalty-Lampard
Corners-Gerrard
Captain-Gerrard or Lampard..(Your Vote)
tom, you blind bastard
November 24th, 2007 @ 06:44I personally believe(reminds me of Caitlin Upton
) that age should not be considered while choosing a player(e.g. Zidane, Nedved, Larsson, Borgetti, Figo, Cafu were all 34+ at WC-2010).
November 24th, 2007 @ 07:03Beckham is probably the best English player when it comes to providing crosses & handling dead ball situations. However he is slowing down. The problem is the age factor – he is thirty two and a half now & would be 35 by the time WC-2010 starts . England don’t have a great team (I consider them a quarter-final team .. nothing more than that) and the options available instead of Beckham aren’t that great – SWP, Lennon, Betnley have the pace but their crossing isn’t top notch . The other fact that will go against Beckham is the quality of opposition that he will be turning up against every week .. MLS is nothing compared to EPL or Serie A or La Liga
Andrei, my point about Wes Brown is that in the two England games I have seen him play in, he has dropped some absolute clangers. Against Brazil, and then whichever qualifier followed straight after, he made bad mistakes. Yes, if he got more experience, he might improve, but so far, he’s done nothing to convince me that he should be in the team on merit.
I admit, Gary Neville has his good points, and I feel he worked very well with Beckham on the right wing, but in the new generation of England, I think Richards works better with SWP, and can run just that little bit more. Credit to him, he is one of the few players with passion.
November 24th, 2007 @ 11:12Good points on Brown, Tom.
I know this is totaly useless, but this si how I see the England team in 2010:
GK: Foster
RB: Richards
DC: Taylor, Terry
LB: Cole (hopefully not Joe)
DM: Hargo
RW: Walcott
MC: Lampard
LW: Milner
FC: Rooney
S: Agbonlahor
Bench: Carson, Woodgate, Beckham, Baines, Owen, Bentley, Gerrard (gasp!).
November 24th, 2007 @ 17:45